similar to: NetworkManager, multiple IPs, and selinux...

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Donderdag 11 juni 2015 19:59:39 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs On 11 Jun 2015 13:28, <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> wrote: > > > > ----- Oorspronkelijk

Hello All, on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude laptops, with 3 different wireless cars, of Centos7 and Mate desktop, it looks to me like NetworkManager is nog managing wireless. When clicking the nm icon in the top right corner, I'm not seeing access points. Wifi seems enabled [root at localhost ~]# nmcli g STATE CONNECTIVITY WIFI-HW WIFI WWAN-HW

Hi list, I've installed C8 on my workstation. I configured my network devices (two bridges, two nics) using nmcli. Now that NM is the default I tried it. On C7 I always disabled it. I noticed some problem: 1) During the boot, also if NetworkManager-wait-online.service status is OK, I noticed that opening a terminal and ping some address it needs some time to perform ping and any

Hi All, I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as expected. When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing for my other monitoring

On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as >> expected. >> When I restart

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "johan vermeulen7" <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 18:23:58 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Aan: "CentOS

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > Hello FrancisM, > > Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > > > > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing > to > > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > > > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > > > 2 port

Once upon a time, Lists <lists at benjamindsmith.com> said: > I understand that it's possible to allow the 4 VM guest systems to each have a > "direct" fixed IP address and access the addresses \via the host network > adapter, while the host retains its fixed IP. If you are running NetworkManager (the default), it's not too hard. Here's an example

Hi Leon, I don't have access to a CentOS 6.10 system handy, but it looks like a policy issue. If I take you're ausearch output and pipe it to audit2allow on my CentOS 7.6 system, I get the following: #============= httpd_t ============== #!!!! This avc is allowed in the current policy allow httpd_t httpd_sys_script_t:process signull; Noting that on my 7.6 system with selinux enforcing

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > > > Also, it was suggested that I use nmcli in a cronjob to re-activate it if > it > drops. I can check to see if it's still active by 'grep'ing the IP > address, > but I don't know the nmcli to re-activate an existing WIFI connection. > > Can anyone help here too,

Dear Simon, every second IP-address is unwanted. We restarted? eno4: nmcli con down eno4; nmcli con up eno4 and the second address vanishes. Then after a few ours, the second ip address reappears. This is the config-file of eno2: # cat ifcfg-eno2 TYPE=Ethernet PROXY_METHOD=none BROWSER_ONLY=no BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes

You could say the same thing about computers in general: I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of the market!. Eliezer ---- Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: eliezer at ngtech.co.il -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gary Stainburn Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:17:53PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I only have ifcfg-lo , which I am pretty sure is the loopback interface. > As expected, other files suggest eth0 is my ethernet connection. > Should I add a one-line ifcfg-eth0 file? If you are using ethernet (and not a wireless device or some other internet connectivity) you should have an ifcfg- file for the interface.

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:34:43 +0100, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 07:58, Asle Ommundsen <aommundsen at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Tonight I upgraded two CentOS 8 boxes to CentOS 8.1 (1911). Then after a >> reboot of the first server the network was unavailable. In IPMI console >>

On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James

On 02/16/2017 04:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote:

On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>>

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

How to configure DNS server and search domain common for all network interfaces not per device? The only reliable way I found we can set DNS name server and search domain in CentOS 7 is using nmcli which adds DNS name server and search domain to *a specific interface*, e.g. nmcli con mod eth0 +ipv4.dns [IP_ADDRESS]. But I want to set them for all interfaces weather they are configure and

On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>>>>