Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "2038 year Problem"
2018 Oct 03
1
2038 year Problem
At Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:49:56 -0500 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote:
>
>
> From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
> To: centos at centos.org
> Message-ID: <fd4926e4-5430-7203-8f51-07d6ec4df2de at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem
> References: <8831B7AE-76C1-4CF1-815C-EF52D4C5DE10 at abas.de>
> In-Reply-To:
2018 Oct 03
3
2038 year Problem
On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote:
> I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue.
I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these
people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of
money to tend systems over new year's eve/day.
I was working for an ISP at the time and got none of this. Nothing
happened. I don't even recall
2018 Oct 02
0
2038 year Problem
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:42 PM Johann Fock <Johann.Fock at abas.de> wrote:
>
> Hallo
> Im using CentOS 7
> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. In 2038 I will be
79 - maybe I will have to come out of retirement to work on that.
2018 Oct 03
0
2038 year Problem
On 10/02/2018 12:41 PM, Johann Fock wrote:
> Hallo
> Im using CentOS 7
> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
>
Well, CentOS-7 will be EOL'ed on 30 June 2024 so does it matter?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
2018 Oct 02
0
2038 year Problem
On 10/2/18 10:41 AM, Johann Fock wrote:
> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
If you define the problem as the limitations of system clock based on a
32-bit representation of seconds relative to the epoch, then the answer
is "yes."? The Linux kernel uses a 64-bit clock on 64-bit systems.
Any given application may store dates in a format of its own
2013 Mar 06
1
Installation Samba on RHEL6.4
Hallo
First i try to install samba 3.5.21 on RHEL 6.4
Im getting the message:
Loaded plugins: kabi, product-id, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin, security, subscription-manager
This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use subscription-manager to register.
This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or RHN Satellite.
Loading support for Red Hat kernel ABI
2018 Oct 03
0
2038 year Problem
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:46 PM Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote:
> > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue.
>
> I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these
> people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of
> money to tend systems over
2012 Aug 01
1
timeBasedSeq stumbles over the year 2038 (xts package)
I have the following problem:
As expected I obtain
timeBasedSeq( 2037/2037)
[1] "2037-01-01"
>
However if I do the same for 2038 I get
timeBasedSeq( 2038/2038)
[1] "2038-01-01" "2039-01-01"
I get the same strange result if I use later years or any interval that contains 2038:
timeBasedSeq( 2037/2039)
[1] "2037-01-01" "2038-01-01"
2004 Aug 30
3
cannot access files after update samba 3.0.5 -> 3.0.6 (Redhat 6.2)
Redhat 6.2
kernel 2.2.14-12
Samba 3.0.6
compiled with ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --localstatedir=/var/log/samba --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/rc-abas.d --with-configdir=/etc/rc-abas.d --enable-debug
I can list directories and write files on a samba share but cannot read files. This happens with Windows XP client or smbclient. After downgrading to 3.0.5 samba
2007 Jan 09
1
no linear model with many objects
Hi all,
Is any way to estimate the parameters of a curve, not manualy, from many subsets of my dataset
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2006 May 09
9
Working around the year 2038 bug in Ruby''s Time class?
I would have never imagined that I''d be bitten by the Y2038 bug
someday... but it just happened and, trust me, it hurts!
I have to deal with a database containing datetime fields with dates
up to 2050 and more. ActiveRecord raises an exception because Ruby''s
Time class implementation.
Besides running Ruby on a 64-bit platform, what can be done to avoid that?
Does a
2004 Apr 05
4
memdisk : booting OpenBSD and NetBSD
hi there.
I'm trying to boot several OSes floppy images from a cdrom via memdisk.
Actually, Linux and FreeBSD boots fine, but, while i'm using the same method,
I couldn't get into booting netbsd nor openbsd.
The boot process seems to hang up, in those two cases, when the second stage
native bootloader try to load the kernel (i'm not absolutely sure about this).
The native first
2003 Jul 04
1
more on PXELinux confiuration file woes and "blkSize"
Hi
I just joined this list so sorry i don't just reply folowing mails.
I experienced the same problem where the boot just stop after reaching Ready.
I am using my own tftp server written in Java which previously has succeeded
a pxe boot. While searching for the "Ready" problem I found that the
tftpserver returned the wrong blksize. Instead off returning the size off the
data it
2019 Feb 18
2
Password change **apparently** failing in Windows 10 with 4.7.1
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:08:46 +0100
Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Mandi! Nick Howitt via samba
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> Could be that:
>
> > unix password sync = Yes
>
> Add a little delay, that ''confuse'' win10 box?
>
I doubt it, it is probably another artefact of the 'Windows doesn't
care
2024 Mar 18
2
CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)
Hi all,
As you're all aware (we sent multiple mails in the last year about
this), CentOS 7 and Stream 8 will go EOL soon :
https://blog.centos.org/2023/04/end-dates-are-coming-for-centos-stream-8-and-centos-linux-7/
Let's lists some things that will happen on the CentOS Infrastructure as
we'll be approching (or passed) these dates :
# CentOS 7/8s content itself
Usual process :
2004 Apr 24
4
Debian Package Behavior Suggestion
Hello,
I just did a quick ''apt-get update'' then ''apt-get install shorewall'' from
the debian unstable tree. This was on the www.shorewall.net mirror server.
And, to my horror, after upgrading the package, it automatically restarted
shorewall!
Of course I have done this before, but I absent-mindedly just went through
the usual procedure for debian upgrades
2008 Dec 10
3
Wine should use Mono and Gecko installed in the system
Wine FAQ says Wine is not an emulator, but in fact, it works like an emulator - it
does not enhance Linux API, but simply creates a virtual Windows environment completely isolated from other parts of the system.
* If one runs a .NET based program, Wine requires Win32 Mono to be installed
under Wine, instead of Mono already installed in the system.
* If a program tries to do html rendering, Wine
2014 Nov 05
1
[3.16 stable PATCH 0/2] virtio-rng: two backports to fix stuck
Hi Amos
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree:
> >
> > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree
> > FAILED: patch
2014 Nov 05
1
[3.16 stable PATCH 0/2] virtio-rng: two backports to fix stuck
Hi Amos
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree:
> >
> > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree
> > FAILED: patch
2016 May 05
7
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
On 5 May 2016 at 13:23, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote:
> Is the list PG, PG-13, R or at what level do "we" adults all consider
> "ok". Even on broadcast tv (in the US) you'll hear some profanity.
> (context)
> https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/obscene-indecent-and-profane-broadcasts
Excellent context!
> Some people have pointed