similar to: CentOS Digest, Vol 163, Issue 13

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "CentOS Digest, Vol 163, Issue 13"

2017 Sep 07
0
peer rejected but connected
Thank you for the acknowledgement. On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:39 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > yes, I see things got lost in transit, I said before: > > I did from first time and now not rejected. > now I'm restarting fourth(newly added) peer's glusterd > and.. it seems to work. <- HERE! (even though.... > > and then I asked: >
2017 Sep 04
0
peer rejected but connected
Executing "gluster volume set all cluster.op-version <op-version>"on all the existing nodes will solve this problem. If issue still persists please provide me following logs (working-cluster + newly added peer) 1. glusterd.info file from /var/lib/glusterd from all nodes 2. glusterd.logs from all nodes 3. info file from all the nodes. 4. cmd-history from all the nodes. Thanks
2015 Sep 18
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > Hi Ming & Co, <SNIP> > > > > > I think the future "LIO NVMe target" only speaks
2015 Sep 17
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
Hi Ming & Co, On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > > > As title said,
2015 Sep 18
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Hi Ming & Co, > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > >
2015 Sep 11
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:48 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >>
2015 Sep 23
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > > Hi Ming & Co, > >
2015 Sep 23
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > > Hi Ming & Co, > >
2015 Sep 10
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > As title said, request for your comments. > > Play it in Qemu with: > -drive file=disk.img,format=raw,if=none,id=D22 \ > -device virtio-nvme-pci,drive=D22,serial=1234,num_queues=4 >
2015 Sep 27
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 15:58 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: <SNIP> > > IBLOCK + FILEIO + RD_MCP don't speak SCSI, they simply process I/Os with > > LBA + length based on SGL
2015 Sep 10
5
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > As title said, request for your comments. > > > > Play it in Qemu with: > > -drive
2015 Sep 10
5
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > As title said, request for your comments. > > > > Play it in Qemu with: > > -drive
2015 Sep 18
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > Hi Ming & Co, > > > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >
2015 Sep 18
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > Hi Ming & Co, > > > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >
2015 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 14:02 +0000, Keith Busch wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Ming Lin wrote: > > The goal is to have a full NVMe stack from VM guest(virtio-nvme) > > to host(vhost_nvme) to LIO NVMe-over-fabrics target. > > > > Now there are lots of duplicated code with linux/nvme-core.c and qemu/nvme.c. > > The ideal result is to have a multi level NVMe
2015 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 14:02 +0000, Keith Busch wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Ming Lin wrote: > > The goal is to have a full NVMe stack from VM guest(virtio-nvme) > > to host(vhost_nvme) to LIO NVMe-over-fabrics target. > > > > Now there are lots of duplicated code with linux/nvme-core.c and qemu/nvme.c. > > The ideal result is to have a multi level NVMe
2015 Dec 01
0
[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 17:02 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 01/12/2015 00:20, Ming Lin wrote: > > qemu-nvme: 148MB/s > > vhost-nvme + google-ext: 230MB/s > > qemu-nvme + google-ext + eventfd: 294MB/s > > virtio-scsi: 296MB/s > > virtio-blk: 344MB/s > > > > "vhost-nvme + google-ext" didn't get good enough performance. > >
2015 Sep 17
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > >
2015 Sep 17
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > >
2015 Sep 11
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:48 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > >> > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > >> > basically