similar to: Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image

This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script. On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:19 PM Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > On any web page with an image, if i right-click on the image and select > "Save Image As...", firefox crashes. > > Final messages from stderr: >

Today's ghostscript.x86_64 0:8.70-21.el6_8.1 update causes evince to refuse to display any postscript file. Running evince from a terminal session, I see the errors: invalidaccess -7 invalidaccess -7 invalidaccess -7 ** (evince:1252): WARNING **: Error rendering thumbnail Downgrading to ghostscript.x86_64 0:8.70-21.el6 corrects the problem. Anyone else seeing this? -- Bob Nichols

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos at centos.org > wrote: > Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: > > > > Le 15/07/2018 ? 19:49, Matthew Phelps a ?crit : > >> This is a known issue. See > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the > >>

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Are you referring to this thread by any chance? >> >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-December/148445.html >> >> The upstream bugzilla referenced in there is now private but I >> provided the known

On 08/09/2015 10:21 AM, Peter Q. wrote: > On Aug 9, 2015 8:43 AM, "Robert Nichols" <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > >> I'm still not getting the firefox-38.1.1-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm >> that was announced yesterday (8 August) morning. I looked at >> several of the mirror sites I receive, and they all have the new >> firefox in their

I'm still not getting the firefox-38.1.1-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm that was announced yesterday (8 August) morning. I looked at several of the mirror sites I receive, and they all have the new firefox in their Packages directory, but their repodata is all a day older (7 August), so yum doesn't see the update. Example mirror: http://mirror.cs.uwp.edu/pub/centos/6.7/updates/x86_64/ -- Bob

Once upon a time, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> said: > the lack of VM snapshot capability is a total deal-breaker for me. The capability is still there and works just the same as before. The only change is that the new preferred tool for graphical VM management, Cockpit, doesn't yet support making snapshots. virt-manager is still there for now (presumably until

On 08/11/2017 12:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Robert Nichols > <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: >> On 08/10/2017 11:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 6:48 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On

I have a PCI sound card that I would like to assign to a VM, but when I try to do so the VM fails to start and displays this message: Error starting domain: Unable to read from monitor: Connection reset by peer Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 44, in cb_wrapper callback(asyncjob, *args, **kwargs) File

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote: >> Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install >> of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than >> installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the >> time) fail

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > On 08/01/2015 12:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> parted fs resize is deprecated. >> http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6837 >> parted fs move can only move a partition into free space >> https://www.gnu.org/software/parted/manual/html_node/move.html >>

On 09/03/2015 03:14 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Robert Nichols > <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: >> I have a PCI sound card that I would like to assign to a VM, but >> when I try to do so the VM fails to start and displays this message: >> >> Error starting domain: Unable to read from monitor: Connection reset by peer [SNIP]

Le 15/07/2018 ? 19:49, Matthew Phelps a ?crit?: > This is a known issue. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the > /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script. On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or Phoenix. I've tested this new version, and I'm

Hello. [Resending the message from a subscribed address] I'm Luca Saiu. I'm part of a small but very motivated team in France, working on accessibility; you might have already exchanged some messages with my colleagues Jean-Philippe Mengual, Ksamak and Raphaël Poitevin. We are developing a customized version of debian using Compiz with Emerald and MATE. I've developed a relatively

On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos at centos.org >>> wrote: >> >>> Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: >>>> >>>> Le 15/07/2018 ? 19:49, Matthew Phelps a ?crit :

Just want to verify: CentOS 5's FS utilities are too old to safely resize a *live* (mounted, etc.) root file system (and the CentOS 5 installer/rescue system does not include either resize2fs or fsadm utilities). I am presuming I will need a full-fledged Live CD/DVD to resize the root file system. This is for an old 32-bit laptop that presently has CentOS 5.11 on it -- I want to shrink

When the installer complains that it has detected unsupported hardware, is there any way to tell just what it didn't like? Following the URL in the message just ends up at the RHEL Hardware Certification page, which isn't much help. The installer seemed quite willing to continue with the installation, and poking around from the shell VT I didn't find anything that didn't seem to

On 08/10/2017 11:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 6:48 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 08/09/2017 10:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> If it's a bad sector problem, you'd write to sector 17066160 and see if >> the >>> drive complies or spits back a write error. It looks like a bad sector

Just wondering if anyone might be seeing any similar frequent crashes of Firefox/GNOME/Nautilus lately. I have a couple of users who have reported a problem like this. Any ideas are welcome. Latest CentOS 5.5 w/patches, latest nVidia graphics driver, firefox from repos. | ###!!! ABORT: Request 0.0: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such | operation): file nsX11ErrorHandler.cpp, line 182 |

Where is the SRPM for kernel-2.6.18-18.el5 ? I don't find it in the SRPMS directory on the updates mirrors. -- Bob Nichols Yes, "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.