similar to: Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?

On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > Thanks for the idea, I'm not in a hurry and don't have a desire to > hand-jam upstream versions of firefox onto desktops. I just need to > track progress on the patch release and report an ETA to our cyber > security team. > > I just figured CentOS had a fancy devops CI/CD system somewhere that I > could keep tabs on to watch

On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >>>> >> >> >> <snip> >> >>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for >>> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > > > <snip> > OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for > CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > > They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. > > For CentOS-7 .. we need the

Is there a way to track CentOS's progress on RHSA-2018-2113? https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2113 Thanks!

On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500,

On 07/11/2018 09:20 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:34 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I pushed the 3 SRPMs that are not in CR to: >> >> http://vault.centos.org/6.10/os/Source/SPackages/ > >> All the other new SRPMS should be available from : >> >> http://vault.centos.org/6.9/cr/Source/SPackages/ > > When you have time,

On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >>> > > > <snip> > >> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for >> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > >> They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. >

On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM,

On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >>>>> >>> >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is

On 07/11/2018 04:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil

Mr. Hughes, Thank very much for the update! That's the kind of info I was looking for, if an ETA isn't reasonable to ask for. I can report a summary of your note to my upstream authorities. I support both SL7 and C7 workstations, but had not yet seen the update on the sl-devel list. I appreciate you taking the time to answer this thread! Thanks for your hard work! From: Johnny

I saw an article this morning about the RH developer toolset. basically it includes a couple of packages like PHP python mysql (etc) that are later packages than that included in the released version like a 6.4 for example. So instead of php 5.3 with patches it would be php 5.4 and so on. That is great for a couple packages - but what about more up to date libraries like glib. 6.4 is way behind

Greetings, LLVM wizards. We are using Clang and Orc JIT (v1) to compile and execute C++ code on the fly. If a C++ module calls functions from external libraries, we add them via DynamicLibrary::LoadLibraryPermanently(). The problem we have run into recently is when a module calls a function from the STL -- in particular this swap() function for input streams: #include <fstream>

Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7, but it can also be found at: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:39 AM, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:18:27 +0100 wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > > > I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid > > of

On 07/05/2018 06:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/04/2018 06:35 PM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 16:06 -0400, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Where can I find the srpm for >>>> centos-release-6-10.el6.centos.12.3.x86_64? >>>>

Hi, May be it's not clear to everyone.. so this's just a quick notice to everyone. Don't use CentOS 7 as a developer workstation since currently there is not included any developer IDE. As eclipse was pulled out from the main distro and put into Red Hat Developer Toolset (which is imho a good idea not to use a 7 years old IDE). But Red Hat Developer Toolset is still not supported on

Hi all, I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid of a v3 of the toolset? I've just found that Qt 5.4 requires what's shipped in this v3 (gcc 4.9.1, binutils 2.24) and would prefer installing those from a repo. If not, the sources will rule. Any hint? Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Hi, I'm currently working on one of my team's project to build LLVM full clang toolchain (Clang, libcxx, libcxxabi) on a CentOS machine. Previously we compiled our codebase with llvm-toolset-7/clang++, which by default takes stdlibc++ to compile and link. And now we'd like to switch to use LLVM clang with libc++. I have built libc++ and libc++abi from source (5.0.1 release) and set

Has anybody tried (and succeeded) to get gcc 6.3.1 (or devtoolset-6) to work on CentOS 8? In the Animation and Visual Effect industry, gcc 6.3.1 is still the current recommended compiler (see www.vfxplatform.com), and is required to build many plugins. Unfortunately, it is not a "minimum requirement"... It is THE requirement. So I tried to get it from the vault: -- sudo dnf