similar to: VMWare Workstation 14 on CentOS7

At Sun, 28 Apr 2019 18:53:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 12:11 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop > > machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are > >

Thanks! I can try to modify that for my needs. Any idea where can I find a list of patches? I'll look for centos specific ones that I might want to apply. The spec file you shared has a few upstream patches as well as Fedora specific ones. I wonder does one knows which patches should be applied to each release, do they publish it somewhere? Roee. ?On 1/23/19, 6:35 PM, "CentOS on behalf

I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are "untrusted". With some general websearching reveals that this is a *GNome3* so-called "security" issue (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f5348). I found a thread on the CentOS Forums (I don't have an account

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 13 May 2018 at 14:56, Phil Wyett <philwyett at kathenas.org> wrote: >> I have ideas of contribution areas, but they will be brought up for discussion >> at a later time. More urgent issues like Todo on the wiki, may a good place to >> begin discussion and update as it has not been

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, With now release 5 and below all EOL for over 12 months[1]. What guidelines/policy is in place for removal of old and out of date content from the wiki? [1] 5 is in extended support upstream and documentation etc. remain available until November 30, 2020. Should 5 related content remain until that date? Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a

hi guys I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat troublesome. After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter Something has gone seriously wrong: import_mok_state() failed : Invalid Parameter Has anybody seen that? And maybe know to fix it? many thanks, L.

On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 12:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > With the update to Centos 7.5 it is apparent that we lost the Courier > 10 Pitch fonts that were in "xorg-x11-fonts-Type1".??Does anyone know > how to get this back. > > Greg Ennis > > Hi, Type 1 font support was dropped for 5.3. See below article.

Hi, Any chance someone (Johnny?) could point me towards the latest centos-release src rpm? Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org

Hi, I have to rebuild a handful of CentOS packages for some extra functionality. So I setup a build environment in a virtual machine, and right now I'm trying to find the SRPMS. I enabled the repositories listed in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Sources.repo and then tried this: [microlinux at buildbox:~] $ yumdownloader --source ark Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, priorities Enabling

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:42 +0000, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:32 +0000, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > > hi guys > > > > I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I > > wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat > > troublesome. > > After that upgrade UEFI boot fails

Where do I get an update for gpg2 (GnuPG) for CentOS 6.10 that is compliant with CVE-2018-12020? I'm trying to update gpg2 (GnuPG GNU Privacy Guard) on my fully updated CentOS 6.10 computer to comply with CVE-2018-12020. My system has gpg2 package? gnupg2-2.0.14-8.el6.x86_64.rpm This package does not appear to be compliant with CVE-2018-12020.? I can not find and update anywhere. I have tried

> Hi all, Hello Phil > > Trying to lookup QA related team, data and general info. > > Issues: > > * Not allowed to view below page, even if logged in. > > https://wiki.centos.org/QaTeam The page contains pieces of information which is preferable to not be available for reading to the general public, > * Page below mentions QA mailing list. > >

Am 13.05.2018 um 18:00 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at PoMec.Net>: > > I have started the process of trying to replace our templates with a > new font. 'Liberation mono' is a close match, but for some reason I > don't like the way it looks when the whole page of type is scanned all > together. Try to convert the type1 fonts into a truetype container (using

Hi, Where can I find the srpm for centos-release-6-10.el6.centos.12.3.x86_64? I looked in vault and it is not there. Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org

Noted with thanks. ________________________________ From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Phil Wyett <philwyett at kathenas.org> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:56 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Now that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 has been released... On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 05:46 +0000, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Good afternoon

Good afternoon from Singapore, When will CentOS 8.0 be released? Thank you. -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html

On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 18:50 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 12:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Everyone, > > > > With the update to Centos 7.5 it is apparent that we lost the Courier > > 10 Pitch fonts that were in "xorg-x11-fonts-Type1". Does anyone know > > how to get this back. > > > > Greg Ennis > > >

> See subject line for libreoffice reference. > I would claim that it's late - except it isn't and I'm just going blind. Sorry. P.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Wiki user name: PhilWyett Wiki contribution: * Create own page for personal details and activities ongoing. * Correction of incorrect information. * Removal of out of date information. * After discussion and approval. Addition of new content across various areas related to CentOS. Wiki contribution locations: * Unknown at present. To be

Thanks for the idea, I'm not in a hurry and don't have a desire to hand-jam upstream versions of firefox onto desktops. I just need to track progress on the patch release and report an ETA to our cyber security team. I just figured CentOS had a fancy devops CI/CD system somewhere that I could keep tabs on to watch what's going on as patches get built, tested and published. Seems