similar to: DMARC test , please ignore (eom)

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com > >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content >> that is not suitable for minors. > >> It is possible subscribed under different address. > >> IP of offending spam : >

>> Well I consider the search >> filter by subject is a much better approach, >> for participating on a conversation. > > The Subject is not enough when you have several emails with > the same > Subject entry, specially one right after the other. We are > talking > about a Mailing List, and this situation is not uncommon. > I do follow topics; no

Hi, do we know what happens with the images at major hyperscalers and when? I?m interested specifically about GCP. Who is in charge of centos-cloud project in GCP? You or Google? $ gcloud compute images describe centos-stream-8-v20240312 --project centos-cloud architecture: X86_64 archiveSizeBytes: '7072654848' creationTimestamp: '2024-03-12T11:46:50.983-07:00' description:

Test from Yahoo via Android --Gene

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > Test from Yahoo via Android > > --Gene > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > Unsubscribe or set options at: > http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux As some users may already be aware, my test

On 18/03/2024 08:43, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: > Hi, > > do we know what happens with the images at major hyperscalers and when? I?m interested specifically about GCP. Who is in charge of centos-cloud project in GCP? You or Google? > > $ gcloud compute images describe centos-stream-8-v20240312 --project centos-cloud AFAIK, the team building CentOS Stream doesn't push to

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: <snip/> > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure. > > The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject > > We shall see how

On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > | Hash: SHA1 > | > | On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > | > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: > | >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com > | > > | >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with

julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content that is not suitable for minors. It is possible subscribed under different address. IP of offending spam : Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com [45.55.128.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Test from Yahoo via Android > > > > --Gene > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslinux mailing list > > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > > Unsubscribe or set options at:

> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:34 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > <snip/>

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > >If 1 person with a yahoo.com e-mail adres does reply on this >> message, >> then we have test result for the setting that was changed >> wednesday. > > test Patrick, Due to Yahoo!'s DMARC, you probably didn't see the other two tests I already sent as I didn't see

>If 1 person with a yahoo.com e-mail adres does reply on this > message, > then we have test result for the setting that was changed > wednesday. test

> Well I consider the search filter by subject is a much better approach, > for participating on a conversation. The Subject is not enough when you have several emails with the same Subject entry, specially one right after the other. We are talking about a Mailing List, and this situation is not uncommon. > From a security point of view the logic says that the sender of an >

>I wonder (please forgive my ignorance), whether there would be any >change/improvement if the "Reply-To:" and "CC:" fields would be >interchanged (back) from the current behavior (since March 2014 or so, >http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-March/021895.html ). Perhaps >Hotmail (and family) would accept these (Yahoo-originated) messages >then? AFAIK if the

> > > > > > Let's see what happens. > > > > > > > Perhaps this time? > > I did miss the reason why a new test would be usefull. > Perhaps are people behind the curtains too shy :-) > > The test did NOT show any improvement. > > > In the webinterface of mailman, that is where I access privileges, > is now

> Smoking was loved by millions but it is bad, > smokers are today forced to quit or have an every day > harder life. Why? because smoking kill people... Nice.... > I think it's the way to go; we (lists) are the ones that have to adapt. I'm inclined to agree, but that's not a small thing to change, nor is the path clear. Do you simply make reference to the original

>> Hi Gene: >> Everything that comes from the list goes to my spam >>folder >> because the message looks as >>spam to yahoo. > A simple > filter resolves this: > > Deliver to "Inbox" if > ? To/CC contains "syslinux at zytor.com" Unfortunately no so simple; the Filter option seems to be gone... >> why is not the list >>