similar to: About the membership issue

On 06/16/2018 05:58 AM, Johnny Hughes via CentOS wrote: > On 06/16/2018 05:42 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Concerning the disabled membership (yesterday). Is there anything that I should do? >> Visiting the "re-enable" link shows only a plain site with meta information about >> the list but without any feedback like "membership enabled". Albeit

Am 16.06.2018 um 12:25 schrieb Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org>: > We have now set the mailing list to rewrite headers. That also has set > the From: of the email to the Mailing list and not the Original Author. > The author is moved to the CC: block and you can still easily see who > sent it and my email client (thunderbird) still does things the same way >

On 06/16/2018 05:42 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Concerning the disabled membership (yesterday). Is there anything that I should do? > Visiting the "re-enable" link shows only a plain site with meta information about > the list but without any feedback like "membership enabled". Albeit some postings are > coming in again now (with "normalized"

> Date: Friday, June 15, 2018 14:55:21 -0700 > From: Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Gianluca Cecchi > <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Il Ven 15 Giu 2018, 18:45 Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> >> ha scritto: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:41 PM rj coleman >>>

I just got this On 9 Feb 2019, at 00:00, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > Your membership in the mailing list dovecot has been disabled due to > excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated > 02-Feb-2019. You will not get any more messages from this list until > you re-enable your membership. You will receive 1 more reminders like > this before your

> Date: Saturday, June 16, 2018 05:25:05 -0500 > From: Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org> > > On 06/15/2018 05:18 PM, Richard wrote: >> >> >> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >> dig +short txt _dmarc.yahoo.com >> "v=DMARC1; p=reject;

Since C8.1 kvm guests have a huge delay while booting on a kvm host based on C6. This delay was not present with C8.0. The "pause" happend direct after the grub step. The VNC session shows only a "_" character. Any ideas what changes? -- Leon

Am 10.10.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > On 10/09/2016 06:15 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 09.10.2016 um 19:41 schrieb John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com>: >>> On 10/9/2016 5:33 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> look in /root :) anaconda-ks.conf is a generated ks file for >>> the options you chose during

> Am 29.05.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: > > > > On 05/29/2017 06:46 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 29.05.2017 um 05:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >>>> On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote:

Is this the normal behavior now? Cutting text in gedit and pasting it into the terminal needs that the source application stays running? -- Leon

Just wondering, what exactly is supported/suggested: I need a comprehensive desktop search functionality. Not only searching for file names but also for content and meta data. The environment is EL6.8 / Gnome2. I have noticed that "beagle" is not part of the distro anymore. Any suggestions for such requirement? Thanks! LF

Am 16.04.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: >> Is there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5? >> upgrading os to 6 is not option available. > > > Unfortunately not. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066914 -- LF

Am 09.10.2016 um 19:41 schrieb John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com>: > On 10/9/2016 5:33 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Interesting pointers. Are there somewhere any ks files for EL6? > > look in /root :) anaconda-ks.conf is a generated ks file for > the options you chose during that system's installation. :-) I had the creation of a EL6 livemedia in mind ... --

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 00:47:32 +0200 Leon Fauster wrote: > source: > > find . -type f -exec md5sum \{\} \; > checksum.list > > destination: > > md5sum -c checksum.list Wouldn't diff be faster because it doesn't have to read to the end of every file and it isn't really calculating anything? Or am I looking at this in the wrong way. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~

On 03/12/2015 10:06, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Duncan Brown <centos2 at duncb.co.uk>: >> On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote: >>> On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote: >>> initramfs is missing... >>> check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not do a "yum reinstall

Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? > > Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release > itself. And while you're suggesting where I could find out more or > take part

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >>> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me.

Am 16.06.20 um 22:04 schrieb Fabian Arrotin: > On 16/06/2020 15:06, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004). >> >> Installed kernels are >> kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64 >> kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 >> kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64 >> >>

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF