similar to: CentOS Kernel Support

On 06/13/2018 02:33 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jun 13, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Ken Young <kenyis at rogers.com> wrote: >> Is anyone on the mailing list aware of anyone who supports older versions of CentOS kernels? Particularly, I am interested in getting security patches added to kernel-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.src.rpm. Please let me know. > > As far as CentOS support, only the

On Jun 13, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Ken Young <kenyis at rogers.com> wrote: > Is anyone on the mailing list aware of anyone who supports older versions of CentOS kernels? Particularly, I am interested in getting security patches added to kernel-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.src.rpm. Please let me know. As far as CentOS support, only the latest kernel is supported. This really means that *you* are now

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0294 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0294.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 212a275e48ec514d4861c2a3875dc9db349113c85c7a0ef2bc117433ed672c6a kernel-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.rpm

I have a VPS running C7. I ran a 'yum update' which included a kernel update. The yum update wasn't a total success because mariadb updates failed. However everything else appeared to work. However, when I rebooted the server it did not restart. I have managed to get the ISP's support desk to boot the server by selecting the previous kernel, and I now have access to my box again.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:16:55PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > You might be able to pay Red Hat for an Extended Update Support > > > release of RHEL7 that has a similar version > > > (kernel-3.10.0-514.51.1.el7) but support ends November 30 2018. > > > > >

On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated > > The log below shows: > > [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22 > Loaded plugins:

On 4/5/2017 5:56 ??, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: > dracut -f /boot/initramfs-<kernel_version>.img <kernel_version> I did: # dracut -f /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.img 3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64 and it ended without reporting any error. However, when I rebooted, nothing changed ("no such device: <UUID>. Entering rescue mode..."). Am I missing

On 11/09/2020 07:59, Dedoep wrote: > Hello John & Frank, > > We have tried both Centos8 and > installing kernel-ml-5.8.6-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm but both options are too > "bleeding" edge for our other middleware that still require the Centos > 7 3.10.0-1127.18.2.el7.x86_64. Hence the request. > > Thanks > I have tried backporting the module to el7 for

Hi, I search the following link, and find some kernel source rpm files, such as kernel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.src.rpm. http://vault.centos.org/7.2.1511/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I can't find kernel-3.10.0-327.36.4.el7.src.rpm. Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-06-13 16:27:02, "Fabian Arrotin" <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: >On 13/06/2019 07:47, qw wrote:

On 03/28/2017 11:40 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 03/28/2017 05:53 PM, ken wrote: >> The www has failed me with this, so I'm trying you guys. Sound worked >> great out of the box when I installed 7.2... Yay! I could watch all >> kinds of videos, like on facebook and youtube. And I could listen to >> most podcasts too. But then something happened. It was either a

I migrated a CentOS7 VM (the fedrtc.org site) from an XCP environment to a libvirt/KVM environment. This involved using qemu-img to convert the image from VHD to qcow2 and then using virt-install --import to define the VM in libvirt. Three problems occurred during boot: a) on the first boot, the BIOS screen and grub screen don't appear at all, the screen is blank for a couple of seconds and

Hi Phil, Not sure if you've had time to look at this? As mentioned middleware, like docker-ce, is preventing us from moving to el8. Thanks Dan On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:33 PM Dedoep <stompnoe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Phil, ok that's great thanks. > I have a colleague working through vroc/fake raid issues we're having > when using

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

In another recent thread,[1] someone was having trouble with the yum-plugin-fastestmirror feature, so I suggested he remove it, since it?s just a plugin and should therefore be optional. He reported that it couldn?t be removed due to package dependencies. I investigated further and found that this also affects CentOS 5.11 and CentOS 7.2. (The OP is on CentOS 6.8.) So, I reported it as a bug

Compiling NBD kernel module for kernel 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 fails as follows: # make -C ../../ M=`pwd` nbd.o make: Entering directory `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-3.10.0-514.26.2.el7/linux-3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64' CC /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-3.10.0-514.26.2.el7/linux-3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64/drivers/block/nbd.o

All, Is syslinux 6.03 able to UEFI boot the RHEL7.0 Linux kernel? I'm trying & failing to do this. I haven't UEFI-booted RHEL7.0 kernel via syslinux before. (But I have UEFI pxelinux booted Fedora 20, which is approximately RHEL7.0.) I remember HPA mentioned that older Linux kernels required "UEFI boot assist", something that GRUB2 offers but syslinux does not. And

Tested with latest Asterisk 14.3.0 on Ubuntu 16 kernel 4.4.0-66-generic and Centos 7 kernel 3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64. Absolutely the same behavior. Joshua, maybe you can advice what can be done further? ??, 13 ???. 2017 ?. ? 14:52, Kseniya Blashchuk <ksyblast at gmail.com>: > Ah ok, thank you for checking. > I'll maybe also try with the latest asterisk and/or other distro and

On 03/06/16 04:45, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016, 7:59 PM Albert McCann <albert.mccann at outlook.com> > wrote: > >> In CentOS 7.2.1511 does the 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 (Plus) >> kernel read HFSPlus iMac drives? I don't see any hfsplus modules installed >> anywhere, so I suspect not. > > > It's in mainline so I don't

Phil Perry wrote: > > It looks like a regression. This was originally fixed upstream > (kernel.org) 3 years ago, so if the RHEL7.5 beta kernel has reverted to > 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL' then it is a regression that will break building any > out-of-tree non-gpl modules which need to set caching mode in pte's > > You should file a bug report with Red Hat. > > The

I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this Linux system will no longer be supported. Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable (since, as I