similar to: Interfaces for accessing SSL/TLS certificates

I''m using the current release branch from the repository (version_0) on freebsd 6.1 with ruby 1.8.4. This is the error that is generated when running the code below at the bottom of the message, plus a gdb bt. Sorry no debugging symbols built into ruby but maybe the bt will help anyways. terminate called after throwing an instance of ''std::runtime_error'' what():

I''ve actually found a way to make EventMachine listen to events from a serial port, but only by using the pure Ruby version, using Guilliame Pierronnet''s Ruby/SerialPort library. It turned out to be simpler than I thought it would be: require ''serialport'' $eventmachine_library = :pure_ruby require ''eventmachine'' module EventMachine class

Sorry this is going to be a bit vague, but I''ve noticed something rather odd going on with EventMachine on Linux. I''ve written something uses EventMachine to proxy HTTP to other processes. On OS X, it works great, adding only about 20% extra latency into the connection when proxying versus connecting to the original backend process directly, so a 5ms connection might now take

Hi everyone, If you subclass EventMachine::Connection and call it outside an EventMachine::run event loop, EventMachine crashes! Example: class Put < EventMachine::Connection include EventMachine::Deferrable HOST="localhost" PORT=8080 def self.request(data) EventMachine.connect(HOST, PORT, self) {|c| c.instance_eval { @data = data } } end #

Hello, I have been looking at the Ruby/EventMachine. First let me say it look very good. Reactor model with no threads makes for fast reliable server, and I have read about marvelous Twisted framework for Python and am glad to see something similar for Ruby. I am writing network app with Ruby threads now and it very slow, and I try new Ruby 1.9 with native threads that make it much slower.

Hi EM Gurus, I''m hoping someone can shed some light on the following... I''m using a 3rd party (legacy) server that can accept up to 8 simultaneous connections on one port. I''ve been able to make multiple connections to this server from within one call to EventMachine::run {...}. Specificaly, I can access each connection separately using: em_thread = Thread.new do

I made a quick patch to em so it will try to read the key/cert from a file if it exists in the cwd, and if not use the hardcoded default. If I added a function in rubymain.cpp to set the location of the pem file, where in em would be the right place to set it? It should be in the same scope as start_tls I would think. I''m checking for the pem file in InitializeDefaultCredentials().

My Rails application requires a very busy worker process running in the background at all times. I am launching this non-interactive process using script/runner. This process is very busy and is communicating with the MySQL server constantly. As I started putting some load on the system to test, I started running into performance issues. I have since discovered that Rails is only using 1

Is getsockname (or its equivalent) available to an EM Connection object? I''d like to access the local port number in my client application. --Michael

I heard about a new mongrel plugin or version that''s single threaded and uses non-blocking IO with events. It''s called something like "swifty fly". Anyone have a link for it? Thanks.

I need to deal with a large file (about more than 2G [byte]) with eventmachine. I wrote a simple program with using "stream_file_data" as send a large file from client to server. But It didn''t work. Applying below a quick fix patch, I think it works well. Could you go over this patch? Regards, -- Kuroishi Mitsuo diff -rup

I upgraded from 12.2 to 12.4 and found that my happy little eventmachine processes die with: terminate called after throwing an instance of ''std::runtime_error'' what(): call SetTlsParms before calling StartTls Here''s what I believe is the relevant snippet of my code, which calls start_tls() in the connection_completed() callback: connection =

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/eventmachine-talk/attachments/20071018/a54f2b61/attachment.html

Francis, I read in the list archives back that a future EventMachine release will support epoll on Linux (i.e., it''s in the trunk). Better still, is there a possibility that EM will rely on libevent so that it will be architecture independent (i.e. epoll on Linux, kqueue on FreeBSD/Mac OS X, /dev/poll on Solaris)? This is how memcached is implemented, and it would be helpful to be able

Just thought I''d let you know that your http parser worked great for creating an http protocol handler for Eventmachine. It wouldn''t take that much effort to use Eventmachine for Mongrel, might be worth a shot just to see how it does. A few things would need to be restructered, like HttpRequest where you read the rest of the body, and calling the handler. But it

I occasionally get a fatal error unable to delete epoll event: Bad file descriptor I think the attached patch will fix it. The patch does two things: 1) changes the error we look for from ENOENT to EBADF. It is hard to reproduce this error, but if I change the epoll_ctl line to epoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 666, ed->GetEpollEvent()); it does return -1 with errno = EBADF on my Linux 2.6.9

Short question: is there way to tell EM to actually send data after send_data call? I''m building a file transferring app. I send Mashal.dump''ed metadata first, and then - the file contents (chunked). I found a silly bug: receive_data() gets marshalled metadata and the first chunk of the file in a single variable. Like that: c1.send_data("meta")

All: I recently wrote an LDAP library for Ruby called Net::LDAP, and I''ve noticed that quite a few people are using it to do authentication and authorization for Rails apps. I know there are several well-done login generators for Rails, but what about people that would rather use a directory? If we were to write a generator for Rails that used LDAP (or A/D) as the backend, would

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8

I''ve added experiments/core-model-2 to SVN. I think this is pretty clean and satisfactory. Jeff, please have a look and see if you like the placement of timeouts (which are currently unimplemented). Any event now has the possibility of a timeout. To get an application-level timeout, you''d just post an event with a timeout to a nil target. When the timeout expires, the errback