similar to: Update announcement request

> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- > plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not > updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain > about mismatched versions though. "kernel-plus-3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.centos.plus" not ".2.3.". Al McCann There's been a circus in my

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Albert McCann <albert.mccann at outlook.com> wrote: >> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- >> plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not >> updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain >> about mismatched versions though. > >

On 05/25/2018 11:32 AM, Albert McCann wrote: >> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- >> plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not >> updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain >> about mismatched versions though. > >

On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 5:50 AM Albert McCann <albert.mccann at outlook.com> wrote: > > Along with the recent kernel update (3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7), the CentOS 7 plus kernel was likewise updated. The plus kernel though hasn't shown up in the mirrors yet, while the plain kernel has. Could someone please push the release button for the plus kernel? That "someone" is Johnny

I'm still using CentOS 4.6, but have been planning an upgrade to CentOS 5 for quite a while. One of the things that was holding me back is that the CentOS 5.0 kernel did not have the framebuffer support enabled by default. So I waited for CentOS 5.1. However, on one of my test systems I ran into the bad NFS performance issue (see CentOS bug 2635), so I plan to use the centosplus

quite possibly more a yum question than a centos question, but i'm a bit confused about the difference between listing "available" packages versus "updates" packages. short example -- listing what the yum man page suggests should be "available" for installation, restricting myself to centosplus: $ yum list available --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=centosplus ...

On 11/25/2016 11:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Albert McCann <mac358 at newsguy.com> wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes >>> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:13 AM >>> To: centos at centos.org >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recent

Along with the recent kernel update (3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7), the CentOS 7 plus kernel was likewise updated. The plus kernel though hasn't shown up in the mirrors yet, while the plain kernel has. Could someone please push the release button for the plus kernel? What I do see in the various random mirrors I've manually checked is the previous plus kernel

On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > Has anybody enabled this repo? > I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > as the dependencies are rather different. I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more than a year with no problems. I don't recall reading anything on this mailing list or IRC suggesting that enabling plus caused issues with

On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > >> Has anybody enabled this repo? > >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > >> as the dependencies are rather different. >

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:13 AM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recent updates for CentOS7? > Then we will commence work on the OS tree and ISOs. Historically, this > takes 10-21 days for the full tree and ISOs .. but except for the >

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades >> as the dependencies are rather different. > > I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more > than a year with no problems. I don't

Something else that you might want to do is count the number of journal commits that are taking place, via a command like this: perf stat -e jbd2:jbd2_start_commit -a sleep 3600 This will count the number of jbd2 commits are executed in 3600 seconds --- i.e., an hour. If you are running some workload which is constantly calling fsync(2), that will be forcing journal commits, and those turn into

Is there some reason the ahci kernel module is *missing* from the 2.6.9-89.0.16.plus.c4 kernel? It is in the standard 2.6.9-89.0.16.EL kernel. Is this due to an oversight or is there some sort of conflict? I wanted to add IEEE1394 support to my system running CentOS 4.8. I *looks* like what I need to do is download the kernel SRPM and patch the config to include the IEEE1394 modules and

A new kernel for Centos 7.4.1708 was released several days ago, version 3.10.0-693.17.1. Will there be a matching CentOS Plus kernel? Thanks for all the effort in providing that. Also, is there an announce list for Plus updates? -- I yam Popeye of the Borg. Prepares ta beez askimiligrated. Albert McCann albert.mccann at outlook.com

On 28/01/18 19:04, Albert McCann wrote: > A new kernel for Centos 7.4.1708 was released several days ago, version 3.10.0-693.17.1. Will there be a matching CentOS Plus kernel? > > Thanks for all the effort in providing that. > > Also, is there an announce list for Plus updates? > > -- > I yam Popeye of the Borg. Prepares ta beez askimiligrated. > > Albert McCann

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:1318 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1318 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: af10287508a7362f9c018b0e6c59ba7bc608260adff8bacbbd9ece097f74742b kernel-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:1318 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1318 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: af10287508a7362f9c018b0e6c59ba7bc608260adff8bacbbd9ece097f74742b kernel-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64.rpm

Hi all - should I be surprised to be receiving these notifications today when a newer version, 3.10.0-862.3.2, corresponding to https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1629 appears to already be available from CentOS ?yum update? Installing: kernel x86_64 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7 updates 46 M Noam

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Albert McCann <mac358 at newsguy.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes >> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:13 AM >> To: centos at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recent updates for CentOS7? > > >> Then we will commence work on