similar to: place of other RH sources

> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Leon Fauster > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 11:57 AM > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS] place of other RH sources > > Out of curiosity - does someone known where the sources of other RH > products > are placed? RHEL sources are going into git.centos.org but what about

Am 16.04.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: >> Is there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5? >> upgrading os to 6 is not option available. > > > Unfortunately not. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066914 -- LF

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

in fact: modgnutls provides easy way to get tlsv1.2 to rhel 5 -- Eero 2015-04-16 21:02 GMT+03:00 Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > well. this hack solution might work: > http://www.tuxad.de/blog/archives/2014/11/19/openssl_updatesenhancements_for_rhel__centos_5/index.html > > -- > Eero > > 2015-04-16 17:30 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster <leonfauster at

Am 16.06.2018 um 12:25 schrieb Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org>: > We have now set the mailing list to rewrite headers. That also has set > the From: of the email to the Mailing list and not the Original Author. > The author is moved to the CC: block and you can still easily see who > sent it and my email client (thunderbird) still does things the same way >

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: > >> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that >> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to >> figure out what I need to do to get all the

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 00:47:32 +0200 Leon Fauster wrote: > source: > > find . -type f -exec md5sum \{\} \; > checksum.list > > destination: > > md5sum -c checksum.list Wouldn't diff be faster because it doesn't have to read to the end of every file and it isn't really calculating anything? Or am I looking at this in the wrong way. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~

Am 25.08.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > 25.8.2015 4.03 ip. "Leon Fauster" <leonfauster at googlemail.com> kirjoitti: > >> >> In the hope that some skilled developers are here: >> >> We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 >> >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF

Am 10.04.2019 um 19:00 schrieb mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: > > Benjamin Smith wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 7:40:01 AM PDT Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: >>> >>>> I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have >>>> to do an OS reinstall, my intention is to

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF

In the hope that some skilled developers are here: We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found Is it possible to compile software (compile switch?) on a system that uses a newer glibc but in such a way that can be used (executed) on a system with an older glibc (like here: compiled on glibc 2.14 based system but C6 is on

Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? > > Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release > itself. And while you're suggesting where I could find out more or > take part

On 2015-01-10, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith > <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>: >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: >>> >>> Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have >>> larger grab areas. >> >> Which makes me

Am 15.09.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>: > On 2015-09-15, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-15, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: >> >> this also helps to boot >> >> http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ > > rEFInd will work on EFI-based Macs, but not on old PPC

I'am running into this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206101 while trying to handcraft a kickstart file for CentOS7. Does anybody knowns a workaround? -- LF

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 10.12.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Noam Bernstein <noam.bernstein at nrl.navy.mil>: >> I guess this is really a RedHat, not CentOS question, but I?m hoping that someone here will be familiar enough with the upstream policy to have some useful information. >> >> How does

> Am 25.05.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: > > I seem to be missing some important rpms, even when I enable the clearos-centos.repo which is suppose to include all of the centos rpms not customized by clearos. > > How can I check out if centos7-x64 has these missing rpms: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/ -- LF