similar to: The right way to deal with in-house development

On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 28/12/16 21:24, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>>> On 28/12/16 20:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2016 01:53 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> On 28/12/16 20:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> On 12/28/2016 01:53 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2016 05:11 AM, Todor Petkov wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Robert

On 12/28/2016 06:13 PM, Greg Cornell wrote: > On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> On 28/12/16 21:24, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM,

Hello everyone Agile (XP), informal (no-tie) software house where PHP, Ruby (and Ruby on Rails) are actively used are looking to hire a development team leader that oozes strong leadership and management ability. We''re looking for someone that is able to talk openly but firmly as the challenge will be to provide cohesion between development and commercial and unify the development team

On 28/12/16 21:24, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>> >>> On 28/12/16 20:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/28/2016 01:53 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/2016 05:11 AM,

On 12/28/16, 3:28 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: On 12/28/2016 06:13 PM, Greg Cornell wrote: > On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J

On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 28/12/16 21:24, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>>> On 28/12/16 20:11,

On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 28/12/16 20:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> On 12/28/2016 01:53 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> On 12/28/2016 05:11 AM, Todor Petkov wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >>>>> wrote:

CentOS 6.3. *Just* updated, including most current selinux-policy and selinux-policy-targeted. I'm getting tons of these, as in it's just spitting them out when I tail -f /var/log/messages: Sep 13 15:20:51 <server> setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory @2. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l d92ec78b-3897-4760-93c5-343a662fec67

Hi all, On my newly up-and-running nameserver (CentOS 5), I noticed the following alerts in /var/log/messages after restarting BIND. (lines inserted to aid in reading). As I'm new to SELinux, I'm hoping for some pointers on 1) if this is an issue which simply *must* be addressed, or if it's something I should live with, and 2) how to eliminate the warming messages without sacrificing

Le 23/05/2018 ? 16:58, m.roth at 5-cent.us a ?crit?: > A suggestion: once you've got the firewall issue dealt with, set selinux > into permissive mode; *then* you can figure out what it's complaining > about, while at the same time, your system will be available. Once you've > fixed those issues, then you can make it enforcing. This is always my approach. Turns out the

hi, guys I looked at http://guides.rubyonrails.org/debugging_rails_applications.html and figured I give bleak house a try. I ran into a problem during installation of the gem. Here''s an extract: --------------------------------- Extract start ----------------------------------------------------------- Makefile:671: warning: overriding commands for target `dist'' Makefile:671:

Could you send me a copy of your audit.log. You should not be getting hundreds of AVC's a day. ausearch -m avc,user_avc -ts today On 12/02/2014 05:08 AM, John Beranek wrote: > I'll jump in here to say we'll try your suggestion, but I guess what's not > been mentioned is that we get the setroubleshoot abrt's only a few times a > day, but we're getting 10000s of

Looks like turning on three booleans will solve most of the problem. httpd_execmem, httpd_run_stickshift, allow_httpd_anon_write On 12/03/2014 03:55 AM, John Beranek wrote: > Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and: > > -rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/ps > > dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 /proc > > I'll

Hi, I'm running dovecot (1.1.7) deliver and sieve (1.1.5) on a Fedora 9 platform, using selinux targetet mode. Most of the mail deliveries goes well, but once deliver tried to copy the mail to the /tmp directory, which it seems it not allowed by selinux. I guess that deliver wants to sanitize the mail or something and therefore copies it to /tmp. Before I ask for selinux to allow this, I

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 00:31:21 -0400 From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> To: politech@politechbot.com Subject: [Politech] House bill exports analog phone regs to VoIP http://www.politechbot.com/docs/boucher.voip.bill.070604.pdf There's a new bill in the House of Representatives to regulate phone calls made over the Internet. It was

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on an Internet-facing server. SELinux is in permissive mode for debugging. I've removed FirewallD and replaced it with a custom-made Iptables script. I've also installed and configured Fail2ban (fail2ban-server package) to protect the server from brute force attacks. Out of the box, Fail2ban doesn't seem to play well with SELinux. Here's what I

Hi, I am renovating my house completely and installing new cabling for communication. I'm not to into this PBX thing but I would like to have a simple one for my house, to have different phone numbers for my family members, some kind of integration with my Broadband telephone, and possibly Skype.... Browsing the digium website didn't make me much wiser. I have a linux box that I can

On 28/12/16 20:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 12/28/2016 01:53 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> On 12/28/2016 05:11 AM, Todor Petkov wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Which is why I wonder if there is some different config

Indeed, thanks Dan - it doesn't get us to a completely clean running that would allow us to run our Node app as we are under Passenger with SELinux enforcing, but it at least has stopped the excessive amount of AVCs we were getting. John On 3 December 2014 at 10:01, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like turning on three booleans will solve most of the problem.