similar to: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]

This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware ESXi 5.1. The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh (timeout error). The details of last issues was reported to retrace.fedoraproject.org. ?Do you have a hint? [root at vmguest ~]# abrt-cli list id

Not sure if this was the last email on this.? If not ignore me. However I found a post for new operating systems that says to set the watchdog_thresh value instead of softlockup_thresh.? http://askubuntu.com/questions/592412/why-is-there-no-proc-sys-kernel-softlockup-thresh this is an Ubuntu post, but on my CentOS 7 system this parameter exists, and softlockup_thresh does not.??I have set it but

Never saw this email....Did anyone get it?? anyone know how to fix this?thanks again. From: KM <info4km at yahoo.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 11:26 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0] All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the email trail, the file

> 2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > >> This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware >> ESXi 5.1. >> The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only >> on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh >> (timeout error). >> > I'm

2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware > ESXi 5.1. > The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only > on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh > (timeout error). > I'm also seeing those errors in several

Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the >> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be >> added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >> Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM > > Yes, I see this

On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: > All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the > email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be > added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. > Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM Yes, I see this behavior as well. Never have found a solution - other

On 24 April 2018 at 17:16, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >>> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs. but as stated in the >>> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist. Should it be >>> added? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >>>

Hi, I'm in need of rebooting a server 1 minute after I give the command. I'm used to shutdown -r +1 which works as advertised. Now that shutdown is part of systemd <http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/shutdown.html> and it is actually a link to it in CentOS 7, I've seen in the documentation

Hi there, Is there a way to prevent Windows HVM guests from seeing passed through devices like graphics cards as being ejectable? i.e. you pass through a graphics adapter to an HVM guest which happens to be Windows. Windows sees this as a device with hotplug capability. Therefore it shows up in "safely remove hardware" option in the windows system tray. VMWare provides an option to

Hi all, while fiddling with VmWare View without being able to join windows7 client to samba4 domain, we stumbled on the following article: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1028164 which says, should we run MS Windows 2008R2 AD, we should enable the "Allow cryptography algorithms compatible with Windows NT 4.0"

Hi BTRFS community I have a problem using btrfs/nfs to store my vmware images. - following setup :(debian wheezy + backports) Linux sncubetest02 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.14.12-1~bpo70+1 (2014-07-13) x86_64 GNU/Linux > btrfs --version Btrfs v3.14.1 > btrfs fi show Label: none uuid: 8e37c8d0-e0ef-4857-ae9f-9a1be21901ed Total devices 2 FS bytes used 210.27GiB

Hi, I followed the discussions regarding the "time moved backward" problem and the use of ntp in such cases. At our department we are running two dovecot servers within an vmware server environment, and unfortunately the timedrift (with ntpd active) exceeds sometimes up to 30 minutes virtual drift within 10 minutes realtime (mostly into future). This is due to some overcorrections

I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts resulting in remounted-read-only filesystems as well as other filesystem issues - I can unmount a filesystem and force a check with "fsck -f" and occasionally find errors. I've found -

Hello, Over the last several weeks I've had a couple of CentOS 7 guests running in ESXi freeze because the CentOS halted the CPU. The problem is described here: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2000542 My CentOS 6 VMs are not misbehaving at all, nor are the Ubuntu VMs. Anyone else seeing this bug or know what to do

On Mon, November 24, 2014 15:49, Jack Bailey wrote: > Hello, > > Over the last several weeks I've had a couple of CentOS 7 guests running > in ESXi freeze because the CentOS halted the CPU. The problem is > described here: > > http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2000542 > > My CentOS 6 VMs are not

Hello, I know, often asked, often discussed .. No recommendation from Citrix. What is the better solution? 1) use ntp in the XEN host and synchronize the guests with the clock running on the control domain (independent_wallclock=0, what the default is) 2) or use ntp in host and guest (and independent_wallclock=1) I ask, because the XEN host (bare metal) has a more stable clock and if the ntp

Hello In a VM with CentOS 7, kernel 3.10.0-327.28.3.el7.x86_64, the console root login shows "[ 72.776182] dm-0: WRITE SAME failed. Manually zeroing". What is wrong? Regards, MM

Hi, I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. ?It keeps throwing error stating- "Requested memory size is greater than allowed maximum of 3072 MB. Could not initiate memory hot plug."? I understand from few threads that 32bit OS has this kind of limitation but I am able to understand why I am seeing

I just updated my quad-processor X64 machine (AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 945 Processor) to the latest CentOS 5 xen kernel (2.6.18-371.4.1.el5xen) and I am getting occasional "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#n stuck for X s! [swapper:0]" messages. I did some net searching, and found some bugzilla reports (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649519 and http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4488),