similar to: memory cgroup max_usage_in_bytes question

On 05/04/18 01:56, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > hi all, > > can someone help explaining what we are seeing? it makes no sense to us. > this is a host running centos 7.4 with 3.10.0-693.17.1 kernel, and it > has 192GB of ram > >> [] free -b >> total used free shared buff/cache available >> Mem: 201402642432 14413479936

Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > hi all, > > can someone help explaining what we are seeing? it makes no sense to us. > this is a host running centos 7.4 with 3.10.0-693.17.1 kernel, and it > has 192GB of ram > >> [] free -b >> total used free shared buff/cache >> available >> Mem: 201402642432 14413479936 75642777600

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Akemi Yagi <toracat at elrepo.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Stijn De Weirdt <stijn.deweirdt at ugent.be> wrote: >> latest kmod update 20-15.el7_4.6 is broken on our systems, while >> previous 20-15.el7_4.4 was working fine (and downgrading fixes the issue). >> >> the issue is with modules from mellanox

Hi all I have CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406, libvirt 1.2.7 installed. Just after create and start inside LXC container present cgroups. Example for memory: [root@ce7-t1 /]# ls -la /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 . drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 280 Sep 15 17:14 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 cgroup.clone_children --w--w--w- 1 root root 0 Sep 15

hi johnny, >> anyone any hints how to debug this or some clues what could be going >> wrong here. > > Do you have an exclude in /etc/yum.conf for ibutils-libs? how embarassing. there was indeed an exclude on ibutils-libs. (this must be some leftover from using mlnx ofed. we are switching from c73+mlnx ofed 3.4 to c74 stock ib (there's no mlnxofed3.4 for c74, and our old

hi all, latest kmod update 20-15.el7_4.6 is broken on our systems, while previous 20-15.el7_4.4 was working fine (and downgrading fixes the issue). the issue is with modules from mellanox kmod rpms that are symlinked in the weak-updates dir. the config files in /etc/depmod.d look ok (and do work with previous version): dist.conf has weak-updates after built-in, and mellanox kmod rpms ship a

On 02/15/2017 03:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/15/2017 02:39 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i'm trying to rebuild the current sssd-client.i686 rpm that is part of >> the x86_64 repo, but i fail to do so. rebuilding the sssd.src.rpm on >> x86_64 does not produce this rpm. >> >> i can rebuild sssd.src.rpm with --target=i686, but

hi all, i have a general question (a bit surprised ti's not on the centos faq): we found a bug in a package in a centos install, and we are wondering what the best approach is to get TUV to fix it (and release an update), so it gets fixed in centos rebuild and thus on our nodes. or at the very least to get it on their todo list ;) bugs.centos.org seems an obvious candidate to get them

hi all, i'm trying to rebuild the current sssd-client.i686 rpm that is part of the x86_64 repo, but i fail to do so. rebuilding the sssd.src.rpm on x86_64 does not produce this rpm. i can rebuild sssd.src.rpm with --target=i686, but that sssd-client rpm has conflicts and a whole bunch of i686 deps that the rpm from the centos repo doesn't have. tips/help welcome stijn

The Redhat guys are normally responding very well to bug reports from Centos users. They don't seem to differentiate. Using bugs.centos.org seems quite pointless. I normally just use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/. On 30 July 2015 at 13:12, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 07/30/2015 03:37 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > > hi all, > > > > i have a

Hi folks, For complicated reasons, I'd like to have a service (lightdm) start after sshd starts. (This is on CentOS 7.) I've tried adding "sshd.service" to the lists of "Active=" and "Require=" items in /etc/systemd/system/lightdm.service (which started as a copy of /usr/lib/systemd/system/lightdm.service), but these changes don't seem to have

hi all, i'm trying to understand an issue i'm having with a yum repo (it's a mirror of the c74 repo). there's an rpm in the repo (ibutils-libs in this case); but the client using this repo says it cannot find this rpm (i did yum info ibutils-libs --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c74 to exclude all other repos). other rpms are ok to use, so nothing structural going wrong (i think)

Dear Rexperts, First of all let me say that R is a wonderful and useful piece of software. The only thing is that sometimes it takes me a long time to find out how something can be done, especially when aiming to write compact (and efficient) code. For instance, I have the following function (very rudimentary) which takes a (very specific) data frame as input and for certain subsets

Dear R users, I have a problem with reshaping data. I know such questions have been asked before, but I can't get it right, neither with the reshape function nor with the melt function. My dataset has about 407 variables and about 48000 cases. Each case looks as follows: V1 v2 v3 v4 v5 v6 v7 x1 y1 x2 y2 .... x200 y200 V1 is unique, v2-v7 are

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66696 Priority: medium Bug ID: 66696 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Nouveau does DMA to/from unexpected address QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: stijn+bugs at

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

Hi all, I got the following error message when booting up my app (which works fine with Rails 3.0.0.beta4) in Rails 3.0.0.rc; activesupport-3.0.0.rc/lib/active_support/file_update_checker.rb:27:in `stat'': can''t convert Array into String (TypeError) When I put some debug code on that line I see the follwing array being passed;

Hello, I'm using a samba server with one harddrive with several partitions. I want to copy some file from one partition to the other. My pc runs on Ubuntu and using the file browser I can easily copy files from one partition to the other. If I copy files from one samba share to the other using the file browser the file will be transported over the network to my pc and then back to the other

Shorewall version 2.2.1 2 Interface setup. eth1: 10.10.1.3 eth0: 192.168.1.2 modem is 192.168.1.1 I need to be able to connect to my adsl modem, but when shorewall is up I get connection rejected. I have added "192.168.1.1 RETURN" above the line "192.168.0.0/16 logdrop # RFC 1918" in "/etc/shorewall/rfc1918" but still getting connection rejected Is there

Hi, I'm getting the message in the subject when I run systat -vm on a lightly loaded server. Top shows interesting CPU usage %: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Some Googling tells me that a fix for this went in around 1998 in sys/i386/isa/clock.c, see http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/159/1998/7/0/777198/ (fix verified to be present in