similar to: exim PAM authentication: all users unknown

Hi all, This is the first time I use the dovecot mail list so I?m sorry if I forget something. My problem is that for some reason I can get public mailboxes to work. I have setup the directory Public, the folders and the cur,tmp and new folder in them: Public | |- .office3 | |- cur |- tmp |- new |- dovecot-acl Here is my dovecot conf: # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS:

hi! i'm trying to do smtp authentication using dovecot and exim4 by following this guide http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL. for the exim4 part, i got an authenticator dovecot: cannot find authenticator driver "dovecot" ?error after i entered the codes in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template and reloaded exim4 with the update-exim4.conf command. i'm running debian

Hi, On CentOS 7.7.1908 I've got the following error message: unix_chkpwd[1026]: could not obtain user info (root) I dont' know why... There are no SELinux errors, and the permissions of relevant files are: ls -Z /etc/shadow /etc/passwd /usr/sbin/unix_chkpwd -rw-r--r--. root root system_u:object_r:passwd_file_t:s0 /etc/passwd ----------. root root system_u:object_r:shadow_t:s0

I don't know why you have issues using different names. I have multiple AORs assigned to a single endpoint and it works fine. I have to admit that my AORs do contain the endpoint name, though. For example, for endpoint "myswitch" I have two AORs, "myswitch_1" and "myswitch_2", and I assign them to the endpoint with aors=myswitch_1,myswitch_2. When you say that

I just realized that you are asking about dynamic AORs, not static Contacts in an AOR. That may be the difference. I have never actually tried giving a dynamic AOR a different name. And you wouldn't want more than one dynamic AOR, you'd just use an AOR that allowed more than 1 contact. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:59 PM Trey Hilyard <kctrey at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know

I am running asterisk 13.1.0 In pjsip.conf, the endpoint section has an aors and an auth field. I can name the auth field anything I want. The key is to set the auth=field accordingly. However, when I try this with the aors field, it never works. It seems I have to name the aors=field to match the name of the endpoint section. Is this correct? Would there ever be a need for multiple aors to

I have the following configuration... [aor3] type = aor max_contacts = 1 remove_existing = yes [auth3] type = auth username = 1004 password = SuperSecretProbation [1004] type = endpoint context = IS transport = transport1 auth = auth3 aors = aor3 accountcode = 3 dtmf_mode = rfc4733 device_state_busy_at = 2 force_rport = no moh_passthrough = yes disallow = all allow = ulaw acl = acl1 When a

I'm setting up a dedicated database server, and since this will be a central service to my various web servers I wanted it to be as secure as possible...so I am leaving SELinux enabled. However I'm having trouble getting Apache to use mod_auth_pam. I also now can't get setroubleshootd working to send me notifications of the denials and provide tips to solve the problem. The Apache

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 3:04 PM Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > I have the following configuration… > > > > [aor3] > > type = aor > > max_contacts = 1 > > remove_existing = yes > > > > [auth3] > > type = auth > > username = 1004 > > password = SuperSecretProbation > > > > [1004] > > type = endpoint >

<pre>I have a machine with the follow specs.<br /><br />Linux hermes.business.com 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1 Thu Jun 2 22:55:56 EDT 2005<br />i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux<br /><br />pam-0.79-8<br />dovecot-0.99.14-4.fc4<br /><br />No one is able to receive e-mails due to authentication failures and yesterday afternoon<br />they were able to.<br

Hi, I believe having less root setuid binaries on system is The Way ... so: Why does RH6.2 ships with /sbin/dump & /sbin/restore root setuid? These are for sysadmins, not for regular users I hope. Is /sbin/unix_chkpwd really used and what is it used for? I haven't find anything about it in pam documentation. Is it really necessary to ship /usr/bin/gpasswd and /usr/bin/newgrp? Does

Hi, I have some problem in Dovecot authorization in Exim for outgoing SMTP. Version of Exim is 4.69 and the Exim was compiled with "AUTH_DOVECOT=yes" and "AUTH_PLAINTEXT=yes". Version of Dovecot is 1.2.12. I use SSL for IMAP. Is Exim neccesary to use SSL(TLS) for authorization of outgoing SMTP? Configuration files is as follows; - Exim

Hello all. Sorry for a lot of question - im making a new mail system now. Im wondering how to auth different MUA. For example Thunderbird & The Bat 4.x - CRAM-MD5 MS Outlook 2007 - DIGEST-MD5 Im create a 3 users and store passwords in LDAP using MD5-CRYPT(1), CRYPT(2) and MD5(3) - for tests. If im not use "secure connection" in thunderbird - im auth fine(plain text over SSL)

Hi I'm using Dovecot 1.0.stable branch on a production Fedora Core 3 server. All is running very well other than I getting tons of these messages in the log (/var/log/messages): Nov 26 13:38:56 bmw unix_chkpwd[19360]: password check failed for user (xxxx) Nov 26 13:38:56 bmw imap(pam_unix)[19359]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=x.x.x.x user=xxxx However

Hi to both adressed mailing lists, I followed the instructions in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL exim.conf: | plain: | driver = dovecot | public_name = PLAIN | server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client | server_set_id = $auth1 | | login: | driver = dovecot | public_name = LOGIN | server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client |

Having a hard time figuring out something that is supposed to be easy. Tryiong to configure Dovecot so that it provides authentication to Exim for outgoing smtp. Tried different things and getting authentication socket protocol error dovecot_plain: driver = dovecot public_name = PLAIN server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client server_set_id = $auth1 auth default { # Space

Hi, I have a severe filesystem crash on a machine with a single ext3 filesystem. It is the second time that this happens to me (on two different machines that are identical in hardware setup and mostly in software - I cloned them when I started to work). It looks like the journal (or something else, i am not an expert here) has gone wild and overwritten loads of inodes. I have a single filesys

Hi all, I have this log messages in my linux fedora core 3. > smbd[2923]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server... > Jul 11 14:45:23 fedoraserver smbd[2923]: nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP > server after 1 attempt(s) > Jul 11 14:46:42 fedoraserver smbd[2947]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to > LDAP server... > Jul 11 14:46:42 fedoraserver smbd[2947]: nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP

I am having issues integrating a FC3 system with AD running on W2k3. I can not figure out why the user ID mappings and Group ID mappings are going stale. This is a generic FC3 install with all of the latest updates. login as: jgallagh Sent username "jgallagh" jgallagh@linman's password: Last login: Fri May 6 08:14:23 2005 from 192.168.168.2 id: cannot find name for group ID

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:2969 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2969 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: f0baba96420d32cf4eebb994427ba2f86c7118788b4b3418c7b9402e2cd3c429 java-11-openjdk-11.0.8.10-0.el7_8.i686.rpm