similar to: Good work, Red Hat!

On 6/15/20 5:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 09:42, Manuel Wolfshant > <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro <mailto:wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>> wrote: > > On 6/15/20 2:46 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I got inspired by Adi's earlier suggestion and after reading > https://access.redhat.com/articles/3311301

commit c7cdff0e8647 ("virtio_balloon: fix deadlock on OOM") changed code to increment vb->num_pfns before call to set_page_pfns(), which used to happen only after. This patch fixes boot hang for me on ppc64le KVM guests. Fixes: c7cdff0e8647 ("virtio_balloon: fix deadlock on OOM") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel at

commit c7cdff0e8647 ("virtio_balloon: fix deadlock on OOM") changed code to increment vb->num_pfns before call to set_page_pfns(), which used to happen only after. This patch fixes boot hang for me on ppc64le KVM guests. Fixes: c7cdff0e8647 ("virtio_balloon: fix deadlock on OOM") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel at

Hi folks, Firstly; apologies in advance for what is a head wrecker of keeping on top of the speculative mitigations and also if this is a duplicate email; my first copy didn't seem to make it into the archive. Also a disclaimer that I may have misunderstood elements of the below but please bear with me. I write this hoping to find out a bit more about the state of the relevant kernel

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:0512 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0512 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0fbbf2a32fd018fc78931c2331b8a9ee8e3106b91b5b122084a515f298fa59ec kernel-2.6.32-696.23.1.el6.i686.rpm

Hello ??? For the past months I've been testing upgrading my Xen hosts to CentOS 7 and I face an issue for which I need your help to solve. ??? The testing machines are IBM blades, model H21 and H21XM. Initial tests were performed on the H21 with 16 GB RAM; during the last 6=7 weeks I've been using the H21XM with 64 GB. In all cases the guests were fully updated CentOS 7 --

I thought I'd chime in and say that I'm seeing the same kernel-plus boot failure that Shaun Reitan reported earlier. Is there likely to be another build 3.10 kernel build coming down the pipeline that might fix this issue? Here's the output of my failed PV domU boot: [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [ 0.000000]

Broken! [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64 (builder at kbuilder.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-16) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Thu Jan 4 01:06:37 UTC 2018 [ 0.000000] Command line: root=/dev/xvda ro

Hello, I am using https://github.com/clalancette/oz/tree/v0.16.0 to customise qcow2 images. In CentOS 7.5.1804 (yum updated to latest) the image customisation fails during guestfs launch. Following is the output of libguestfs-test-tool run. Please help in debugging the problem - ************************************************************ * IMPORTANT NOTICE *

On 4/20/2018 8:53 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >> >> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C >> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. >> It is not a

On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > Hi (Stephan?), > is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of > a redirected mail or simply a bug ? > > A sends mail to B, B redirects to C > C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. > It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces > for various

OK, I found a solution: trusted_users = exim:dovecot in my exim.conf fixed it. Anyway this is an important change of behavour between 2.2 und 2.3 In 2.2 the "dovecot" under exims "trusted_users" was not necessary. Olaf On 04/20/2018 02:53 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3

* Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl>: > > > Op 08/05/2018 om 10:34 schreef Olaf Hopp: > > Hi, > > > > I had an email with 58 recipients in the "To" and 13 in the "CC" > > Delivering it from exim to dovecot lmtp panics (see below) > > Panic: file smtp-address.c: line 533 (smtp_address_write): assertion > > failed:

Hi (Stephan?), is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of a redirected mail or simply a bug ? A sends mail to B, B redirects to C C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces for various reasons it goes back to B and A will never know about this. I thick this is came

Hello, After update dovecot from 2.3.0.1 to 2.3.1 the doveadm backup stopped to work. Command line: doveadm -D backup -u email at dominio.com.br -R tcp:mailsrv01:9011 I updated dovecot on mailsrv01 to 2.3.1. Process on mailsrv01 (the count message stop and process stay this way until be killed - this occurs on different mailbox?s) dovecot/doveadm-server [10.0.10.5 email at

Hello, I have some mailbox with error on index-worker process on dovecot 2.3.0 If I move the same mailbox to dovecot 2.2.33.2 this problem dos not happen. See below the backtrace: May 18 10:33:55 Error: imap(xxxxx)<249924><Xpj77npscpYKAQMQ>: indexer failed to index mailbox INBOX May 18 10:33:55 Fatal:

On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >> >> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C >> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender.

The following changes since commit c1d0c3f623ada808904dec676da0126f5b800630: fw_cfg: fix the command line module name (2017-11-14 23:57:40 +0200) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to d9e427f6ab8142d6868eb719e6a7851aafea56b6: virtio_balloon: fix increment of vb->num_pfns in

The following changes since commit c1d0c3f623ada808904dec676da0126f5b800630: fw_cfg: fix the command line module name (2017-11-14 23:57:40 +0200) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to d9e427f6ab8142d6868eb719e6a7851aafea56b6: virtio_balloon: fix increment of vb->num_pfns in

Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: > Hi (Stephan?), > is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve > "redirect" changes the envelope sender of > a redirected mail or simply a bug ? > > A sends mail to B, B redirects to C > C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. > It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces > for