similar to: OT: RepoForge/RPMForge State Survey

On 04/16/2014 05:33 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have > conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging. Does the use of yum priorities take care of this concern? Thanks, Ken

Hi folks, I hope this is the right mailing list to ask since on the repoforge website there is no list or contact information. I have a problem with updating the perl-Nagios-Plugin package. I have installed perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-1.el6.rf.noarch, and running yum update leads to: > Error: Package: perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.35-1.el6.rf.noarch (rpmforge) > Requires:

When did they change/lose their name? I was trying to go there here at work, and the site was blocked. I put in a ticket, and get a response that I may have been looking for repoforge, and rpmforge is for raw food diets.... mark

Hi! I am trying to to ask the packagers from repoforge for updated packages of ganglia and rrdtool and i got no answer on their mail list.. Does anyone have idea if repoforge is still active? Thanks! Adrian

Hey, I ran into a yum conflict regarding an repoforge extra package obsoleting a base package. The thing is that I set a lower priority to repoforge extra... Any idea how come I ran into this issue...? The question is more about the yum priorities than repoforge. ... 1743 packages excluded due to repository priority protections ... --> Running transaction check ---> Package

On 9/30/2015 8:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/30/2015 5:11 PM, Kommander Mighty Aura wrote: >> Hello. I have been trying to add rpmforge as a repository, but yum does >> not seem to be updating the package lists. I tried... > > rpmforge is a dead repo, no longer maintained, I would not use for > anything anymore. rpmforge was renamed to repoforge, although they

Using the instructions on: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge#head-f0 c3ecee3dbb407e4eed79a56ec0ae92d1398e01 I enter the command: rpm --import http://apt.sw.be/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt and it comes back to the prompt, like it worked, but attempting to confirm the download: rpm -K rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el6.rf.*.rpm results in: error:

On 07/02/2015 03:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> OK, here ya go -- >> >> Obsoleting Packages >> >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-Compress-Zlib.i686

"yum update" output: ............................... --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric ---> Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by

Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:

On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > OK, here ya go -- > > Obsoleting Packages > > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-Compress-Zlib.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >

Dear All, there's a security update for libmodplug: This update is needed to fix a security vulnerability with this package. This notification was issued on 2011-05-10 and last updated on 2011-05-09. Update to upstream version 0.8.8.3 (CVE-2011-1574, CVE-2011-1761). I've the following priorities configured: priority = 1 [base] priority = 1 [extras] priority = 1 [updates] priority = 2

Hello. I have been trying to add rpmforge as a repository, but yum does not seem to be updating the package lists. I tried $ yum check-updates [...] Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: <mirror> * epel: <mirror> * extras: <mirror> * rpmforge: mirror.ate.info * updates: <mirror> and searched for any package available there, like i3 and mpv. It is still like

Hey All, For those of you that do not know me, my name is Matthew Fredrickson and I’m the project lead for the Asterisk project. First off, I wanted to thank all of you that contribute in various ways to the project – whether it be at a developmental level, answering questions on forums and mailing lists, contributing documentation, or just generally advocating for it within your sphere of

On 11/17/2015 11:27 AM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote: PS>> Is there a centos recommended repository for PS>> centos 7 where I can obtain the keychain PS>> package? On 11/17/2015 8:19 PM, WJ = Wes James wrote: WJ> I can only see a version for centos 6: WJ> WJ> http://pkgs.repoforge.org/keychain/ WJ> WJ> You?ll need to download the src and see if WJ>you can build it.

On 6/5/2015 10:44 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > Shortly after installing, I got a pop-up > notice that security updates wre available. > On doing yum update, I got error messages: > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge) > Requires: libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) > Removing:

Dear flac developers, We have undertaken a task to assess code complexity triggers and generate recommendations for developing understandable code. Our intension is to share the results with you, developers, so everyone can learn the triggers behind complex software. We need your help for rigorous results. My request to you is - if you get 5-10 min. time, would you please consider to answer

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:11:12PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> This is annoying. I've been trying to get motion working correctly on CentOS 6. First, there was no ffmpeg rpms. Now, I try to install it, and <snip> >> I've run into problems with libfaad being missing before. Here's the real question: how were the ffmpeg and ffmpeg-libs

Hello Jean-Denis. I believe the idea is that you answer the survey for each type of scenarios you are running. So one for call centre, another one for ivr, etc... Regards, Marcelo On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, 02:10 Jean-Denis Girard, <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I would have loved to participate to the survey, but I feel it does > apply to my situation: as an

Hi R users, I request members of the R community to consider filling a short survey regarding the use of R. The survey can be found at http://goo.gl/jw1ig Please accept my apologies for posting here for a non-technical reason. The data collected will be suitably analyzed and I'll post a link to the results in the coming weeks. Thank you all for your interest and for sharing your R usage