similar to: Anyone using GQRX in Centos-7, for SDR ?

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:38:17AM +0000, Nux! wrote: > Is it a Realtek chipset? yes it is. > I've had problems with it on CentOS as the system will load up the DVB drivers (for TV tuner) thus interfering with the SDR. > What worked for me is blacklisting them & reboot. Give it a try. Ah, thanks, that's the trick. works now. > > cat

Is it a Realtek chipset? I've had problems with it on CentOS as the system will load up the DVB drivers (for TV tuner) thus interfering with the SDR. What worked for me is blacklisting them & reboot. Give it a try. cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist_rtl.conf blacklist dvb_usb_rtl28xxu blacklist rtl2832 blacklist rtl2830 BTW there's a new package at

Several weeks ago, we posted a message seeking information about time sources.? There were many helpful and educational responses. An excerpt from one of the responses is included below.? We have been following up with regard to how SDR capabilities might be used for obtaining time using SDR dongles as well as using the time source product referenced in that response. Our SDR investigation has

Software Defined Radio On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 8:40 AM, "m.roth at 5-cent.us" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: Chris Olson wrote: > > Several weeks ago, we posted a message seeking information about > time sources.? There were many helpful and educational responses. > An excerpt from one of the responses is included below.? We have > been following up with

Chris Olson wrote: > > Several weeks ago, we posted a message seeking information about > time sources.? There were many helpful and educational responses. > An excerpt from one of the responses is included below.? We have > been following up with regard to how SDR capabilities might be > used for obtaining time using SDR dongles as well as using the > time source product

On 7/19/2017 11:41 AM, Chris Olson wrote: > Software Defined Radio > I wouldn't want to use SDR as a simple time source.... SDR uses a /lot/ of CPU to make up for the lack of radio hardware. It would make far more sense to get a dedicated WWV or GPS reciever to use as a time reference, unless you're going to dedicate a server just to be a software radio. -- john r

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79912 Priority: medium Bug ID: 79912 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Nouveau unuseable with 3 monitors and a geforce GTX 670 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

When I use plugin ''railstree'' (http://www.hashcode.eti.br/?p=91) as following code: node = Node.new :label => menu_item.name, :link_to_remote => { :base => self, :update => "container", :url => {

Another SDR user here. It was me who reported the bug where total samples wraps around on overflow. FLAC performs extremely well on SDR samples, both speed and compression ratio. In my testing it outperforms any other free lossless codec by a large margin, being 20% smaller and 10% faster than the next best (which was ffv1). The problem is the metadata, and not just total samples. We also

I'm running Samba 3.32 on UbuntuServer 9.04 with both Ubuntu and Windows clients as guests. For some common shares I have create mask = 777 and force create mode = 777. This works fine except that when I *replace* a file on this share by certain methods on an Ubuntu client, the permissions get set to 733 (-rwx-wx-wx), so the file is then unreadable (and undelete-able) by a guest. The

Hello, We've been using Opus for VoIP calls in Jitsi and we're very happy with the sound quality it provides. Thank you for the great work! We are thinking of updating to 1.1-beta and wanted to know if there's any reason not to do so at this point, and wait for the 1.1 release instead. Is the beta expected to be as stable as the 1.0.x series, or are there any known flaws still to

Op di 15 okt. 2024 16:18 schreef Stefan Oltmanns <stefan-oltmanns at gmx.net>: > > I see, but that would require changes in the software using libflac and > require the file to be easily seekable to be able to skip to the end and > depending on how far away the seek points are, it could take a while. > No, seeking to a specific sample can take a while because of all the

Am 15.10.24 um 19:03 schrieb Martijn van Beurden: > > No, seeking to a specific sample can take a while because of all the > back-and-forth, but seeking to almost the end of the file is very quick. > > I know this is not the cleanest way, but as this only for the rare cases Ah, I see, because the frame header also include either the sample number (variable frame size) or the frame

Hi, While doing Linux kernel builds linked with lld, I've tracked down a difference that breaks relocation of the kernel image (e.g. under KASLR[1]). Some relocations are changed to ABS (weirdly, all are in .rodata section). Note the difference below in the resulting linked output. .L__const._start.instance becomes *ABS* only under lld: $ cat minimal.c struct minimal { void *pointer;

I've been monitoring CPU temperature on a few Dell SC1435s running CentOS4 via OpenIPMI and 'ipmitool sdr'. It's been working very nicely, but the upgrade to 4.5 not so long ago seems to have broken something: # ipmitool sdr type Temperature Temp | 01h | ns | 3.1 | Disabled Planar Temp | 04h | ok | 7.1 | 30 degrees C Temp Interface | 53h | ns | 7.1

Dear list, we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are already seen by multipathd. Problem is, that the Sun 7310 has two storage heads which run in

Hi All, As I've said before, Opus is excellent. I use it to reduce network load when running a remote radio, the encoding improvements in 1.1 are very impressive. I downloaded and compiled 1.1 (VS2010) but can't find the 1.1 API changes - maybe I'm just being extra-thick this morning J . Simon GD4ELI/HB9DRV http://v2.sdr-radio.com/ -------------- next part

Hi, I''m running OpenSuse 12.2 with kernel 3.5.3 HBA= LSI 1068e using the MPTSAS driver (patched) (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1379181/) SANOS1:/media # uname -a Linux SANOS1 3.5.3 #3 SMP Sun Sep 2 18:44:37 CEST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I''ve tried to simulate a disk replacement but it seems that now /dev/sdg is stuck in the btrfs pool (RAID10) SANOS1:/media #

Dear all, I have a few old video cards that I want to get rid of. I've been suggested to check whether any nouveau developer would be interested in getting one of them for development / testing purposes. Here's the list : * AGP 4x video card Creative Labs 3D Blaster NVIDIA GeForce 2 GTS (NV15) DDR 32 MB VGA output * AGP 2x video card NVIDIA Riva TNT2 (NV5) SDR 32 MB VGA/TV output *

hello, I''m running XEN 2.0 on IBM ThinkPad T23. Now the weird thing is that I get two different outputs from /sbin/lspci depending on whether I run 2.6.8.1-xen0 or 2.6.8.1-bproc. In particular the output from 2.6.8.1-xen0 seems to be missing those 4 lines 0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 02) 0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI