similar to: sshfs mounting on Centos 6.9

Hello! I have samba share on my sshfs-mounted folder. All works just fine except I can't delete files from sshfs unless they are in 0777 chmodded directory. Even if that files were putted trough smbclient. I can read files, write files (regardless their directory permissions) but not delete them. Here is my share config: [myshare] comment = shre over sshfs path = /home/kli/work/remotes/dev

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7424 Summary: -x with sshfs Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugs at dotcommie.net QAContact: rsync-qa at

I mounted vpopmail/domains in sshfs. root at 192.168.239.205:/mnt/disk-b/domains on /mnt/domains type fuse.sshfs (rw,nos uid,nodev,max_read=65536,allow_other) I used qmail+dovecot+vpopmail+mysql dovecot-2.0.beta4. I mounted sshfs with vpopmail/domains directory. my /usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/mail.conf file mmap_disable = yes dotlock_use_excl = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes

You could try using an automounter, like autofs, in combination with sshfs. It'll be slower, possibly a lot slower, but it should be more reliable over an unreliable connection. I've been using: remote -fstype=fuse,allow_other,nodev,noatime,reconnect,ServerAliveInterval=15,ServerAliveCountMax=40,uid=0,gid=0,ro,nodev,noatime :sshfs\#root at remote.host.com\:/ BTW, I'm not sure

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1942 Bug #: 1942 Summary: mounting home directory with sshfs -o reconnect requires patch for ssh Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

New to sshfs and new to this mailing list so please guide me if required. Is this a bug? When sshfs is given option -o rellinks, it responds with fuse: unknown option `rellinks' According to my understanding of the sshfs man page and --help output this option a) is valid and b) should be passed to the module, not to fuse. Versions: SSHFS version 2.4 FUSE library version: 2.8.5

Hello, Renaming a file via sftp on an sshfs mount resulted in a failure with errorcode 38 (ENOSYS). This is reproducable with openssh release 4.9p1 & 5.1p1 in combination sshfs 2.2 (latest releases). Investigation revealed that sshfs only implements the rename()-call and not the link()-call (used by sftp-server). Attached is a patch to perform the rename()-call upon a failed link(). The

> On Dec 3, 2007 5:19 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos at szeredi.hu> wrote: > > > Yes it is weird. I hope you can help me with this problem as sshfs is > > > so much simpler than nfs. > > > > Can you please do one more thing: start up sshfs normally, then on the > > server do a strace of the sftp-server process: > > > > strace -o /tmp/strace.log

Hello, Using older libguestfs 1.34.6-2 (from Ubuntu's standard package), I encountered this: libguestfs fails with an error, but the error code is "success": $ sudo guestmount -m /dev/sda1 --ro \ -o allow_others \ -a data.qcow2 \ /media/foo fuse: unknown option `allow_others' libguestfs: error: fuse_new:

Hello, I'm trying to build a sshfs available environemnt. Info: [root at pandora /]# uname -a ; yum list \*fuse\* installed Linux pandora 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Jun 14 18:01:24 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Setting up

Hi A search of google failed to show any prebuilt rpms for sshfs and fuse. I do see that fuse support is in 2.6.14 kernel which isn't a whole lot of help. Before I dive headlong into this has anyone successfully built fuse/sshfs against Centos 4.4. If so would you share your experience? Thanks Daveh

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6077 Summary: rsync doesn't modify content of sshfs volumes Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Alle, Does anyone know if there are any reputable repositories out there that contain packages for fuse/sshfs? Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu America, INC. E-mail: cwfox at us.fujitsu.com

On 24/09/2020 12:47, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > I am using it on Fedora with Volume Definition looking like this: and I use this: <volume fstype="cifs" ??????? server="CIFS_SERVER_FQDN" ??????? path="linprofiles" ??????? mountpoint="/mnt/%(USER)" options="username=%(USER),uid=%(USERUID),gid=%(USERGID),domain=%(DOMAIN_NAME)"

On 25/09/2020 12:55, Robert Wooden wrote: > Thanks Dr, Naumer and Rowland. > > Although still not quite correct, my pam_mount.conf.xml looks like: > root at lws4:~# cat /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml > <debug enable="1" /> > <volume fstype="fuse" > server="mbr04.subdom.example.com <http://mbr04.subdom.example.com>" >

I need to use an existing windows 7 installation in a virtual machine form a libvirt host running Ubuntu 12.10. Windows 7 installs on two partitions. There a 100MB boot partitiona and then the main partition for the installation. If I boot the laptop (which dual boots), I can select Windows 7 and boot it just fine, or alternative Ubuntu. If I select /dev/sda1 in the virtmanager as the source

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Bug #: 1953 Summary: Implementation of xattr in sftp-server for sshfs Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1978 Bug #: 1978 Summary: ECDSA & SHA256 support in SSHFS DNS records Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-os-ietf-sshfp-ecdsa- sha2-07 OS/Version: All

Hi Devs and others, First, many thanks for 14+ years of personal usage rsync. I'm trying to rsync to an sshfs mount point instead of using ssh transport. The reason for this is that I'm using encfs to create files which land on the (untrusted) destination encrypted. After witnessing stalled rsync progress, a barely utilized internet connection and and idle CPU, I stripped this down

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:36:03 AM CEST Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over > > unreliable connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me without all > this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad