similar to: Identifying Official CentOS AWS AMIs

Hello all, and thank you very much for the Centos 7 HVM AMI [1], greatly appreciated! This AMI does not work on the newly launched AWS Frankfurt region (eu-central-1). Any plans for fixing that? According to the AWS announcement [2], "The Region supports all sizes of T2, M3, C3, R3, and I2 instances". (We'll be running the CentOS 7 HVM AMI going forward, but looks like none of

Hello! I'm new to the list and have been reading through the archives in regards to the official Centos AMIs in the AWS Marketplace. From what I've gathered, a direct image download of the official Centos AMIs isn't currently available. But i was wondering if the process for building/configuring the official Centos AMIs was public ... i.e. "here's a code repository with some

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > I'm also working on making the CentOS images available outside of the > Market Place shortly, so details for that ( including regions ) will > likely end up in the same page. > Since you mentioned getting info about AMI ids, do you know anything about the following? Why do the AMIs listed in

Hi All, It's very helpful that CentOS release official AMIs in AWS EC2 marketplace. However, compare to official RedHat Linux and Amazon Linux AMIs in EC2, current official CentOS AMIs in marketplace does not support cloud-init or user-data scripts. which means that these AMIs doesn't support automation and dev-op operations. Since AWS CloudFormation also leverage user-data for initial

Hi all, I've reviewed the mailing list archives and it looks like the "centos.org" AMIs in the marketplace are really official products of the centos project (whatever that means), but I wanted to ask explicitly to confirm. Presuming yes, I've run into an odd problem with the 6.4 x86_64 AMI (not updated). with a few packages, files are not being properly created in

Hi list, I've noticed that instance-backed AMIs are not available in AWS MP (only the EBS ones are there). Still though, also the instance-backed AMIs are listed as published and available on your wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS I've seen that the same question was asked already before but I'm not sure the answer given actually covered the whole question:

Hi, We have noticed that the CentOS 7 AMIs in AWS do not delete their root volumes on termination. It appears this is the way that the AMIs were created. The AWS Linux AMIs appear to have this enabled. So they do delete their root volumes on termination. Does anyone know why the CentOS AMIs are created so that they don't delete their root volumes on termination? Herc

Some additional info... AFAIK, the AMIs I'm referring to are owned/maintained by the CentOS team, not by AWS. Details and suggestions to contact this list for assistance are published at both https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS and https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS Basically, the maintainer of the Centos.org AWS account just needs to add/approve the current AMIs for the g3.* instance

On 07/26/2017 09:29 AM, Stephan Koledin wrote: > Some additional info... > > AFAIK, the AMIs I'm referring to are owned/maintained by the CentOS > team, not by AWS. Details and suggestions to contact this list for > assistance are published at both https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS and > https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS > > Basically, the maintainer of the Centos.org

Hi list, I've noticed that instance-backed AMIs no longer seem to exist for the 'official' CentOS images, though the EBS ones are fine.. Looking at the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS), the AMIs listed on marketplace are slightly newer than what's listed on the wiki, so just wondering if something got overlooked after the last build? Cheers, -- Richard Clark richard at

Hi there, Long-time user of CentOS 7 AMIs from the AWS Marketplace. I see that the latest CentOS 7 and all CentOS 8 AMIs are only available outside of the Marketplace ("These images are published outside of the AWS Market Place and are shared directly" - https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS) I'm really keen to understand if this is short-term situation, or if this is the indefinite

Check the generated OVF for -o rhv and -o vdsm outputs. Variable UUIDs and date/times are filtered out. Make sure the the important UUIDs (disk, volume, VM) are where we think they should be. Signed-off-by: Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi@redhat.com> --- v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv.ovf.expected | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv.sh | 20 +++++++

Hello- Does anyone one this list maintain the official CentOS 6 + 7 AMIs in AWS? If so, could you please enable those images for use with the new g3.* instance types? If this list is the wrong place for this request, please point me in the right direction. Thanks! -Stephan

Hey Guys, I figured someone might have use of this at some point. I've created an iRule for our F5 Load Balancer which performs the following tasks: - Appends STLS to the POP3 Capability list (it does this blindly, so expects the backend POP3 server to not return this) - Watches for the STLS command and initiates SSL negotiation with the client (leaves the connection to the

I am brand new to oop and am having a difficult time getting my head around some ruby stuff. In specific, I am trying to create a library style app that lists topics, articles and comments. I have a table called topics, a table called articles and a table called comments. My models, controller and view are all listed below. What I want to happen is to have the list view list each topic along

Hmmm... typos and thinkos ? Maybe: mean_narm<- function(x) { m <- mean(x, na.rm = T) if (is.nan (m)) NA else m } -- Bert On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 4:40?PM CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Rui's solution is good. > > Bert's suggestion is also good! > > For Berts suggestion you'd make the list bit > > list(mean = mean_narm) >

I am having a problem with ruby''s sort_by function. I want to sort a list of parent model objects based on the children of the parent models. Normally you might say sortedList = modelList.sort_by { |model| model[''someAttribute''] } What I am tring to do is sortedList = modelList.sort_by{ |model| model.children.find(:first, order=>"price desc" ).price}

Hello, I have a question regarding the use of Mocha with rSpec to spec one of my methods. My spec contains the following vehical1 = mock() vehical2 = mock() vehical1.stubs(:mph).returns(150) vehical2.stubs(:mph).returns(250) comparer.add_vehical([@vehical1, @vehical2]) comparer.sort_by(:mph) The comparer is an object that has a basic "stack like" functionality, add_vehical is the

This thread references: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/90258#new http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/82349#143790 ActiveRecord''s find() method has built in ways to avoid SQL injection by using the format > :conditions => [ "user_name = ?", user_name] Is there any such system for escaping injection in :order? It seems to only take a string and feed it to the SQL

hey all, I have 3 tables like this: Images (id,name) Tags (id,name) ImagesTags(imageid,tagid) in my image model I do a "has_and_belongs_to_many :tags" but to make it work I need to rename ImagesTags(imageid,tagid) to Images_Tags(image_id,tag_id). My question is that given that I can''t rename the table, is there any way to make it work with the original names? Second question: