similar to: GUI/X11 login and shells other than bash?

On Fri, December 15, 2017 2:34 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 15 December 2017 at 13:24, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > wrote: >> Dear Experts, >> >> After one of updates that was released some time ago (a Month ago or >> maybe >> even earlier) I have noticed the following. On the machines with default >> runlevel 5 (sorry

On 15 December 2017 at 13:24, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > Dear Experts, > > After one of updates that was released some time ago (a Month ago or maybe > even earlier) I have noticed the following. On the machines with default > runlevel 5 (sorry about old terminology, the new one is still confusing > for me ;-) GUI/X11 login (display manager)

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:04 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is >> correct >> as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. >> >> If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the

On Fri, April 24, 2015 12:04 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/24/2015 9:47 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 04/24/2015 03:57 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >>> if you leave it out the script will run in whatever environment it >>> currently is in. >> >> I'm reasonably certain that a script with no shebang will run with >> /bin/sh. I interpret your

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come >> through backup MX. This is due to the

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154 It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described within the PR remains a real problem, and despite my having proposed something that seems to be a perfectly workable fix, no action has been taken on this PR for some years now. Regards, rfg P.S. The

On 04/24/2015 03:57 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > if you leave it out the script will run in whatever environment it > currently is in. I'm reasonably certain that a script with no shebang will run with /bin/sh. I interpret your statement to mean that if a user is using ksh and enters the path to such a script, it would also run in ksh. That would only be true if you

I made a mistake setting my shell and have set the root users shell to /bin/bash instead of /bin/sh. I am curiuos if anyone knows how to fix this. The machines is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p4 and does not have sudo only su.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a at gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 24 November 2015, Radek Podgorny wrote: >> hello everyone! >> >> i'd like to sincerely ask you to include a fix for ssh-copy-id bug >> i'll be linking below. it's a trivial fix which resolves >> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2206

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

Hi All, I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is correct as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for domain bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a Connect:bbbbb.co.uk RELAY statement into /etc/mail/access and restart sendmail Obviously I have the DNS MX records for the domain are

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hello everyone! i'd like to sincerely ask you to include a fix for ssh-copy-id bug i'll be linking below. it's a trivial fix which resolves https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2206 and eases life of many. it's been field-tested by redhat devs and users so i see no problem in incorporating it.

I have installed Sernet Samba however after installation I cannot confirm the version: samba -V bash: samba: command not found

The sshd server normally builds the environment variables from scratch for a shell process it creates. Except when compile for Cygwin, it simply adds settings to its own set of environment variable settings. A comment in the code says this special case is made because in Cygwin, some of sshd's environment is important for child processes too. I don't run Cygwin (I run Linux), but on my

[in an attempt to provide system.test <- function(...) { system(paste("test", ...)) == 0 } and then file.exists <- function(file){sapply(file, function(f)system.test("-e", f))} (which would provide S-plus [>= 4.x] compatibility) ] Look at this -- ``the horror'' to me : > (system("test -e /tmp")) sh: test: argument expected [1]

We use power broker here at work and where wondering why we need it. I was able to setup a new linux server using samba and am able to login with my active directory accounts but I couldn't figure out how to set the login shells. I have a work around but would like feedback in my /etc/samba/smb.conf I have the following security = ads realm = DOMAIN.LONG workgroup = DOMAIN idmap

Hi everybody, I just updated to the latest svn trunk version, but now the code does not compile anymore. It trows an error in "f:\dev\llvm\lib\system\Win32/DynamicLibrary.inc(159) : error C2228: left of '.find' must have class/struct/union". Below you can find the small patch which makes the compiler happy again :-) Sincerely yours Marius Wachtler

I''m trying to get capistrano to deploy to an osx machine - rake remote:cold_deploy but it fails on the svn co line with "bash: line 2: svn: command not found" I''ve set the proper path to svn (/usr/local/bin) in both .bash_profile and .bash_login but capistrano seems to be ignoring these. How does capistrano know where to look for svn? Thanks

On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This >> is >> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them >> to >> define their statute. >> >> People split into two groups: >> >>

While logging in via ssh (versions 1.2.17 and 1.2.12) under Linux 2.0, I found that limits weren''t being set (as shown by the output of "limit" (tcsh) or "ulimit -a" (bash). Since /etc/profile, /etc/csh.cshrc, and /etc/limits were ignored, I made /etc/sshrc and put "ulimit" statements in it. However, I was unable to limit the number of processes this way,