similar to: CAA records using PowerDNS from EPEL

--On Friday, December 08, 2017 7:54 PM +0000 MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net> wrote: > PowerDNS supports CAA records beginning with version 4.0, but the pdns > package in EPEL for most recent centos versions is stuck at around > version 3.4 (3.4.11 is what I have). > > Do I have no other choice but to manually compile and maintain my own > pdns installation? I prefer to

Hi, I just tried to build using http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/pdns-3.1-2.el6.src.rpm on CentOS 6.4 final (kernel: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64), but it failed when looking for ldap libs: Note: I did not change anything in the original spec file. ... + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu

Does anyone have experience with PDNS? The reason I ask is that I have never heard of it before today, but it looks like we might want to leverage its sql backend capabilites. My (useless) searches lead me to: * http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-es/2009-February/004499.html * http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-July/078975.html (in spanish...) *

On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: > Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >> >>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >> and >>>> subscribed for them. >>>> >>>> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace >> inbox"

On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>> >>>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >>>> and >>>>>> subscribed for them.

Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it would conserve disc space. But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one account that has over 2GB when I inspect the mail location of the user using the linux command `du`

I know there's a couple third party repos offering PHP 7 for Centos. I prefer not to add too much third party that I don't have to and PHP 7 has been mainstream for some time now, I thought maybe it would be in EPEL by now. What is the most recommended and stable way to get an up to date PHP on Centos 7?

Hi everyone, How does one go about putting a request for getting a package included in centosplus? We are heavy users the product PowerDNS and are keen to see that be included in the centosplus repository, so it can be compiled against other recent packages like MySQL5 etc. Any pointers will be helpful -- "I never look back darling, it distracts from the now", Edna Mode (The

Hello everybody, I just wanted to upgrade my system and stepped over the following error: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: pdns-3.4.7-1.el7.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: libmbedtls.so.9()(64bit) Removing: mbedtls-1.3.14-1.el7.x86_64 (@epel) libmbedtls.so.9()(64bit) Updated By: mbedtls-2.2.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)

>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created and >> subscribed for them. >> >> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace inbox" >> containing the needed mailbox definitions in the userdb lookup for >> such users? If so, how would the userdb lookup result be formatted? >> Presumably as > >

Hi, I am trying to compile an application (PowerDNS) with PostgreSQL support. Where do the PowerDNS libraries get installed under CentOS? I am constantly getting the error checking for PgSQL library directory... configure: error: Didn't find the pgsql library dir in '/usr/include/lib/pgsql /usr/include/pgsql /usr/include' -- "I never look back darling, it distracts from the

On 14.03.2017 05:57, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-13 13:40, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: >>> On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >>>> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>>>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a need for

on centos 7 I tried to install banshee from EPEL yum install banshee gotting this error: Error: Package: banshee-2.6.2-11.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgpod-sharp >= 0.8.2 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest seems known problem but ignored to fix it in a year or more:

How can I query the current pigeonhole version from a running instance to verify it is what I expect? Possible to get `dovecot --version` to show things like that?

On 2016-10-25 06:51, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 25.10.2016 09:43, mrobti at insiberia.net wrote: >> I have inherited a 10+ GB mailbox which dsync converted to maildir >> very nicely. But 15GB in tens of thousands of messages is too much in >> one INBOX when used in webmail. >> >> I guess it's best to divide the messages into subfolders for date. >> >>

Hi Everyone, I am trying to build the PowerDNS rpm from the source rpms powerdns-2.9.20-3.MIND.src.rpm, it requires opendbx-devel which I am trying to build from the instructions at (http://www.linuxnetworks.de/opendbx/download/index.html) I have subscribe to centosplus for packages like mysql5 and php5. I have the following MySQL packages installed [root at charlie ~]# rpm -qa | grep mysql

I have inherited a 10+ GB mailbox which dsync converted to maildir very nicely. But 15GB in tens of thousands of messages is too much in one INBOX when used in webmail. I guess it's best to divide the messages into subfolders for date. Is there a server-side way to safely move messages into new subfolders so that Dovecot indexes and UIDs won't break? If I write a shell script to move

Dear all, I wrote the following batch script on a iMac, and ran it on a linux mosix cluster. tu <- read.table("cage.mm5.tags.rna_lib.CAA-CAJ.tu-reshape.table") tu_reshaped <- t(reshape(tu[1:50,], direction="wide", timevar="tu", idvar=c("rna","lib"))) write.table(tu_reshaped, "cage.mm5.tags.rna_lib.CAA-CAJ.tu-reshaped.table")

Is there any reason the "extras" repo hasn't been updated in a while? Modules like kmod-xfs and kmod-drbd/kmod-drbd82 are frequently used and haven't been updated for the latest kernel. Powerdns is two months behind the critical security update to 2.9.21.1. If you're going to provide the extras repo as a default CentOS repository, then it MUST be given the same attention

Hello, I am having a some problems getting SSHD to run on the Ipv6 interface. Interface/Ipv6 Address: ipv6.open-systems.org [kevin at satan kevin/xp-0.0.15] 536 $ping6 ipv6.open-systems.org PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::cab --> 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::caa 16 bytes from 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::caa, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=73.96 ms sshd_config: ListenAddress