similar to: Good linux software RAID primer advise

>> Could someone recommend good Linux software RAID primer. It would >> be good if it has good coverage of monitoring and dealing with failures. https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid

>> Could someone recommend good Linux software RAID primer. It would >> be good if it has good coverage of monitoring and dealing with failures. https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid

Dear Experts, Could someone recommend good Linux software RAID primer. It would be good if it has good coverage of monitoring and dealing with failures. I inherited a couple of boxes with big bunch of software RAIDs each, and I even may have some problems, but I don't want to bother anybody with specifics unless I really hit brick wall, not just my own ignorance. Thanks in advance for all

Oh! It's works. Thanks a lot. God bless you all. --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em qui., 30 de mai. de 2024 ?s 10:40, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> escreveu: > For a GPO to work, both "Authenticated Users" and "Domain Computers" must > have "Read" rights. > > On a Policy Object, go to

> On 04 Jun 2016, at 22:14, Miguel Medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >> Can someone therefore please explain to me what exactly these GPO >> restrictions are that Samba can't handle? I'd also appreciate if someone >> could list which other GPO I cannot set successfully using RSAT. > > It seems to me that the FAQ is pretty clear. The

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:32:01 +0100 "miguel medalha" <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >having a particular group > > > set as "Primary group" > > > How are setting the 'primary group' ? > > The 'primary group' had been set a long time ago, when the system was > created. It had been set with ADUC, under the

--On Saturday, September 14, 2019 5:23 PM +0100 miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > they need a Windows server for a couple of administrative applications Do they really need Server for that, or would a workstation do? I use a workstation as a license server for one app, and another workstation for the management console for the burglar alarm and antivirus. I've got my

I did that kind of in the past. Now I dont because I have plenty of resoruces available. But. So far you have not provided stats on server usage (cpu,ram) over a 24hour or 7 day 8am-5pm timeframe. So I will asume you have plenty of usage/performance to spare. I suggest you to -if possible- replicate the current server setup somewhere else and then install the KVM and dependencies via yum. That way

On Sep 14, 2019, at 11:23, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > I hope that someone here can give some advice on the following: > > I have a Samba based Active Directory. A CentOS 7.6 machine runs as a file server and hosts the Windows user profiles for all the Windows workstations. > > Now management has decided that they need a Windows server for a couple of

Hallo, works but must be licensed. Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 14.09.2019 um 19:01 schrieb Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>: > > >> On Sep 14, 2019, at 11:23, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: >> I hope that someone here can give some advice on the following: >> >> I have a Samba based Active Directory. A CentOS 7.6 machine

Hai, But i did understand you, so no i was not taking you wrong ;-) I did not see it as a "bad intention". I tried to repond funny.. with we can know everything.. :-/ .. im just not funny .. Any correction is good als long it has something why/how/where. You gave a an update in the packages RSAT for Win10, ao im a happy camper also with your comment. Greetz, Louis >

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:19:03 +0100 "miguel medalha" <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > > What does 'getent passwd ausername' return on a Unix domain member ? > > For that same user, it returns the user ID and the ID for "Domain > users". Then the users primary group is 'Domain Users' and this is what Unix will use to create

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 16:17:20 +0100 "miguel medalha" <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >> It might help if you tell us what your actual './configure' was ? > > >> Something else might be pulling in the requirement for lmdb. > > Here it goes: > > ./configure -j 8 --with-systemd --with-statedir=/usr/local/samba/var >

oh sorry I forgot to mention that actually, I did. ________________________________ From: miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 5:13 PM To: Emad Yousuf Said Al Kharusi; samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] error in samba 4.10.0 while using samba-tool domain provision > I'm using RHEL 7.4 > > I have built the samba from source, downloaded

Thanks. I did read that. Maybe my understanding is wrong. I thought that by adding the samba service, everything that shows as samba would be enabled. 445, 139, etc didn't have samba so I added them with --add-port. Is that not an accurate assumption? Do I need to open each of those ports individually rather than allowing the service? The only thing I don't see is: tcp 0 0

?and this is a Debian Bookworm with back ported packages. Samba-tool should belong to samba-common-bin which I have installed from the backports. But it isn't there. On 3 Oct 2024, at 20:58, Anders ?stling <anders.ostling at gmail.com> wrote: samba-tool seems not to be installed on this member server. Isn?t that command only available in the samba-ad-dc suite? On 3 Oct 2024, at

Hi, This way don't works too. root at samba4-dc:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=forestdns -Uadministrator Password for [EMPRESA\administrator]: ERROR: Failed to add role 'forestdns': LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <000020AE: SvcErr: DSID-03152BF7, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data 0 > <> root at samba4-dc:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns

I can boot from DVD. I deleted kernel. Thought it will fix the problem. Now I can see rescue menu only. Kernel source is there. How to get back kernel. On Friday, November 20, 2015, Arun Khan <knura9 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Siva Prasad Nath > <shivaprasadnath21 at gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Hi, > > My server not able

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:20:15 +0100 "miguel medalha" <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > > > By default, every AD user is a member of 'Domain Users' and so, > > > > when you use the 'rid' backend every Unix user gets the group as > > > > their primary group. > > > > > > > The only way to change this is by using

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:30 PM, <centos-request at centos.org> wrote: > Send CentOS mailing list submissions to > centos at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-request at