similar to: Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: > On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things >> just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the >> opposite with RHEL where

On 28 November 2017 at 16:06, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: >>> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>>> >>>> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >>>>

On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single > rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things > just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the > opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the > point release. > > What is the case with users on this list who

On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: >> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>> >>> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >>> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things >>> just work between point

Le 29/11/2017 ? 08:26, Sorin Srbu a ?crit?: > If updated, the instrument software will break, like in an atomic mushroom > cloud, rendering critical hardware non-working and lab people standing > outside my office with torches, pitch-forks and all the shebang. > Yupp, unfortunately that's the current state of some lab equipment > manufacturers that use RHEL as a base...

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. > Casale > Sent: den 28 november 2017 14:06 > To: 'centos at centos.org' <centos at centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single > rolling release and rely

This should be easy to answer (I hope).? We routinely kickstart boxes to use for managing our customers RADIUS/DHCP configurations (along with other things).? We've had a C7 kickstart in place since I built one in May and are finally starting to roll it out for new installations.? But, I'm curious as to what ksdevice= actually does. With the C6 we routinely used ksdevice=eth0 since we

Joseph L. Casale wrote: > With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single > rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things > just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the > opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the > point release. > > What is the case with users on this list who support both? > Only

I can't seem to find anything clear on this, but is the C7 version of BIND 9.9 built with Request Rate Limiting? -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at NeoNova 919-460-3330 option 1 mark.haney at neonova.net www.neonova.net

I know this is for CentOS stuff, but I'm at a loss on how to build a script that does what I need it to do.? It's probably really logically simple, I'm just not seeing it.? Hopefully someone will take pity on me and at least give me a big hint. I have a file with two columns 'email' and 'total' like this: me at example.com 20 me at example.com 40 you at domain.com

On 10/25/2017 12:33 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > here is a python solution > #!/usr/bin/python > #python 2 (did not check if it works) > f=open('yourfilename') > D={} > for line in f: > email,num = line.split() > if email in D: > D[email] = D[email] + num > else: > D[email] = num > f.close() > for key in D: >

Hi all, I've got an issue with C6's dhcpd custom logging that I cannot figure out. Hopefully someone has an idea, or has seen a similar issue. We have dhcpd logging to /var/log/messages a custom header (DHCPUSER:) with MAC, IP and Circuit-ID. I'll not bore you with the guts, so here's the beginning of that line in dhcpd.conf: if exists agent.circuit-id { log (info,

On 11/01/2017 01:57 PM, Tristan Hoar wrote: > > Strictly speaking it is depricated > https://anaconda-installer.readthedocs.io/en/latest/boot-options.html#d > eprecated-options > > Regards, > > Tris > Okay, so it looks like I can simply change ksdevice=eth0? to bootdev=eth0, correct? -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at NeoNova 919-460-3330 option 1 mark.haney at

On 11/01/2017 03:25 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> said: >> Okay, so it looks like I can simply change ksdevice=eth0? to >> bootdev=eth0, correct? > I believe you can just leave both off (IIRC for CentOS 6 as well) if you > add "ipappend 2" to the pxelinux stanza. > I probably should have clarified that

I have a couple of in use C7 boxes that were built with ntsysv and chkconfig for some old packages that needed to start using init.d. (The person setting these up didn't know about systemd creating service files for older packages, so we're stuck with these as-is. Here's my problem: Error unpacking rpm package chkconfig-1.7.2-1.el7.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed on

This might be a bit OT, but I've never had to do this before and what I've googled doesn't seem to be working. I have an ansible playbook that I'm working on that I want to run as a cronjob.? One task I'm having trouble with is where I have a text file with lines like: rd.pl "blah blah" rd.pl "blah blah blah" This text file has to be 'executed'

Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: >> >> I have a file with two columns 'email' and 'total' like this: >> >> me at example.com 20 >> me at example.com 40 >> you at domain.com 100 >> you at domain.com 30 >> >> I need to get the total number of messages for

Hi, is there anything that speaks against putting a cyrus mail spool onto a btrfs subvolume?

To be honest, I'd not try a btrfs volume on a notebook SSD. I did that on a couple of systems and it corrupted pretty quickly. I'd stick with xfs/ext4 if you manage to get the drive working again. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com

This might be OT, but it is CentOS related.? I've been running Ansible on C7 for a handful of months now, and updated to 2.4 as soon as it was available. I've been building inventories by hand in that time (mostly due to the fact we had no actual documentation on the managed external customer servers). However, as we have a multiple VMware clusters, thought it might be time to tinker