similar to: XFS quota usage mismatch on CentOS 6 ?

hi all, I hope you can help me with a strange quota/nfs/XFS behavior... I'm using Centos 5.6 on both a nfs server and client. Both are 64-bit, and using a recent kernel: NFS server: Linux fs2.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux NFS client: Linux nx8.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

There are 3 issues here: Grub, the kernel and RedHat. 1) Grub won't run in an XFS /boot partition, but will happily run xfs_state1_5 to boot from an XFS root partition. 2) The kernel has supported XFS quite happily since at least 2005, I am looking at an SGI Propack 4 manual of February that year and it states that SLES 9 SP 1 contains the kernels with XFS support. 3) May be an issue.

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > Anyone made some performance comparison between XFS and ZFS with ZIL > on SSD, in gluster environment ? > > I've tried to compare both on another SDS (LizardFS) and I haven't > seen any tangible performance improvement. > > Is gluster different ? Probably not. If there is, it would probably favor

2017-10-10 18:27 GMT+02:00 Jeff Darcy <jeff at pl.atyp.us>: > Probably not. If there is, it would probably favor XFS. The developers > at Red Hat use XFS almost exclusively. We at Facebook have a mix, but > XFS is (I think) the most common. Whatever the developers use tends to > become "the way local filesystems work" and code is written based on > that profile,

I've had good results with using SSD as LVM cache for gluster bricks ( http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/lvmcache.7.html). I still use XFS on bricks. On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Jeff Darcy <jeff at pl.atyp.us> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > > Anyone made some performance comparison between XFS and ZFS with ZIL > > on

Hi, I just finished writing a small plugin that reports XFS project quota in de IMAP component of Dovecot (1.2, currently). It was written to fill the needs of our organization but someone else might find this useful as well. In its current form it's not suitable for inclusion in the generic quota backend (see ?Drawbacks?). Features: - every mailbox/folder can have its own project ID; -

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote: > >> Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each >> user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how >> much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are >> applied? > > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you

I have a problem with a xfs domu and quota: [root@vs80:/]# quota -u root [root@vs80:/]# On a physicaly system with the same kernel and xfs i get: [root@py123:/]# quota -u root Disk quotas for user root (uid 0): none [root@py123:/]# i tested it with de os (Fedora Core 6) quota tools and the latest official stable. _______________________________________________

On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote: > Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each > user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how > much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied? > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the command similar to: xfs_quota -x -c

Hello all! We are experiencing a strange problem with QEMU virtual machines where the virtual machine image is hosted on a gluster volume. Access via fuse. (Our GFAPI attempt failed, it doesn?t seem to work properly with current QEMU/distro/gluster). We have the volume tuned for ?virt?. So we use qemu-img to create a raw image. You can use sparse or falloc with equal results. We start a virtual

Last time I've read about tiering in gluster, there wasn't any performance gain with VM workload and more over doesn't speed up writes... Il 10 ott 2017 9:27 PM, "Bartosz Zi?ba" <kontakt at avatat.pl> ha scritto: > Hi, > > Have you thought about using an SSD as a GlusterFS hot tiers? > > Regards, > Bartosz > > > On 10.10.2017 19:59, Gandalf

Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied? mark

Hi all, I have a quota problem with xfs (xfsprogs 3.1.7+b1 on debian GNU/Linux 7 -- wheezy) and samba-4.1.19. If I set a user quota to say 10GB, windows explorer reports a 20GB quota of which none used. If I change quota to x, windows explorer reports 2x space of which none used. So I assume samba is somehow getting (albeit incomplete and incorrect) xfs quota info from operating system. disks

Hi, I have a strange problem with user quotas enabled on a xfs filesystem and samba 3.0.21c: When a standard block device (e.g. /dev/sdc1) is used for the fs, quota works like expected: /dev/sdc1 on /mnt/tmp type xfs (rw,usrquota) output from level quota:10 debug: [2006/04/19 14:38:48, 10] lib/sysquotas.c:sys_get_quota(394) sys_get_quota() uid(4004, 4004) [2006/04/19 14:38:48, 10]

Hello, quota support is out of action on xfs filesystem on my centos 4.x . Problem is that i haven't these file #include <linux/dqblk_xfs.h> on my system. Solution is simple. After instalation xfsprogs-devel you get necessary files, but you must use another header file in dovecot/src/plugins/quota/quota-fs.c. Instead <linux/dqblk_xfs.h> you should use <xfs/xqm.h>.

Hi, I managed to configure project quotas on a xfs device on a centos 6.5 server. (just pquota in fstab, no grquota, rebooted server....) Reporting the quota settings and usage looks good. But mounting a smb-share with the proect quota enabled on my os x client shows much less space used (3GB) and 0% free. Currently 650 GB are used, the quota limit is set to 1TB. My user I'm mounting the

Hey Erik, I am running a similar setup with no issues having Ubuntu Host Systems on HPE DL380 Gen 10. I however used to run libvirt/qemu via nfs-ganesha on top of gluster flawlessly. Recently I upgraded to the native GFAPI implementation, which is poorly documented with snippets all over the internet. Although I cannot provide a direct solution for your issue, I am however suggesting to try

First a heartfelt thanks for writing back. In a solution (not having this issue) we do use nfs-ganesha to host filesystem squashfs root FS objects to compute nodes. It is working great. We also have fuse-through-LIO. The solution here is 3 servers making up with cluster admin node. The XFS issue is only observed when we try to replace an existing one with another XFS on top, and only with RAW,

Hi, I am trying to get the most out of my 40TB xfs file system and I have noticed that the inode64 mount option gives me a roughly 30% performance increase (besides the other useful things). The problem is that I have to export the filesystem via NFS and I cannot seem to get this working with the current version of nfs-utils (1.2.3). The export option fsid=uuid cannot be used (the standard

I wrote into the list a few days ago about XFS Group Quotas not working in Samba 3.0.21c and 3.0.22. I have confirmed that if I uninstall 3.0.22 and reinstall 3.0.13, when I change an XFS group quota on Linux and mount a share that belongs to that group, if I look at the "Properties" for that share in Windows, Windows tells me that the "size" of the share is equal to the