similar to: I do not love thee, kernel-3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64

J Martin Rushton wrote: > On 11/10/17 19:28, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I've been having a lot of issues with video, for example. However, this >> one... I have a user with a Dell R730. I install kernel and kernel >> devel, and the rest of the full update, and rebooted. >> >> Nope. 100% kernel panic, right around the time it switches root. I even >>

On 11/10/17 19:28, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I've been having a lot of issues with video, for example. However, this > one... I have a user with a Dell R730. I install kernel and kernel devel, > and the rest of the full update, and rebooted. > > Nope. 100% kernel panic, right around the time it switches root. I even > rebuilt the initramfs, nope. > > And speaking

Is anyone running any Areca RAID controllers with the latest CentOS 7 kernel, 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64? We recently updated (from 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64), and we?ve started having lots of problems. To add to the confusion, there?s also a hardware problem (either with the controller or the backplane most likely) that we?re in the process of analyzing. Regardless, we have an ARC1883i, and

Hi everyone, I updated the kernel from 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 to 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 . While I was following these steps https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom (I knew that I needed to compile again everything) in order to activate WIFI, the laptop crashed doing # depmod -a # modprobe wl Noting that I replaced (naively) # depmod $(uname -r) from the guide (stupid

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Noam Bernstein Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 8:54 AM To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS] Areca RAID controller on latest CentOS 7 (1708 i.e. RHEL 7.4) kernel 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 > Is anyone running any Areca RAID controllers with the latest CentOS 7 kernel, >

Hi, folks, I've got a new Dell R730 server. My users have two Tesla K-80's in it. Then, they wanted to add video, for complicated reasons. Anyway, there's the onboard VGA; I just put in a Quadro K600 (they require DP, and this card offers that). Plug in a VGA monirot (the card even comes with two adaptors, one from large DP to DVI-D, and one DVI-D to VGA. (And according to the

This is happening on anything other than plain vanilla Dell servers. One R730, with dual Tesla cards, one R420, with a fibre card for a RAID device, it never switches root. All these systems have Xeons, not AMD CPUs. We've had this with every one of the 327 kernels. In addition, it seems to happen also with the 229.20.1; the 229.14.1 has no such problem. >From the rdsosreport: starting

> > On 2022-11-08 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 11/8/22 13:12, Simon Matter wrote: > > Is anyone else experiencing trouble with > kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64? > > I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of our VM hosts with > > it. > > I did notice a new libvirt

Hi, I want to know, if someone has tried to use clustering in asterisk to increase its scalability and make it distributed?? If yes, how easy it is to cluster? Can someone please ive me details about the same Thanks Varun __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Everyone, I have two desktop units with : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz that do not allow the login screen to appear after the update of : kernel-3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 and kernel-3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 Both of these units worked properly with kernel.x86_64 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7 I am not sufficiently familiar with grub to know if the problem is related to grub or related to the

On 2019-03-12 17:23, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailLocation Sorry, this might be off-topic, but while reading up on the link you sent, I've noticed the following sentence: Use only absolute paths. Even if relative paths would appear to work, they might just as well break some day. Yet, all examples in the documentation use ~ which is a relative path.

Has this been solved? Is there a bug report I can follow? Thank you for letting me know, Val?re Binet On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:23 PM Bill Gee <bgee at campercaver.net> wrote: > On the other hand --- I just upgraded one of my CentOS7 systems to > 3.10.0-1160.80.1 today. With that kernel it will not run any KVM guest. > The system hangs - HARD - within one or two seconds of

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: > >> I experienced a bug that is likely the same as >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit >> b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it,

On 7/1/2015 2:58 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> I'm setting up UEFI booting and got to the point of having the system talk >> >to the dhcpd/tftpd server, grab the first image files (syslinux.efi) and >> >then continuously request the secondary image file (ldlinux.e64). > So it appears to go deaf. > >> >I'm wondering if I'm missing something or if someone

On 10/28/2017 12:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > I have two desktop units with : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz > that do not allow the login screen to appear after the update of : > kernel-3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 and kernel-3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 > > Both of these units worked properly with > kernel.x86_64 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7 > > I am

On 10/28/2017 12:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > I have two desktop units with : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ > 3.60GHz > that do not allow the login screen to appear after the update of : > kernel-3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 and kernel-3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 > > Both of these units worked properly with > kernel.x86_64 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7 > >

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: > I experienced a bug that is likely the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ > ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit > b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it, > doesn't appear in this kernel and doesn't apply cleanly either. > Is there any point in trying to

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: >> >>> I experienced a bug that is likely the same as >>>

Ok... I just fully updated a user's machine. And got a kernel panic on reboot. So, having run into this earlier this year, I tried to reinstall the kernel. yum reinstall kernel-3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 Installed package kernel-3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 (from updates) not available. Error: Nothing to do Huh? Anyone? mark

I just adore the install. Esp. of GRUB. Does *anyone* who works on GRUB actually work in the real world, and not only on brand new machines? I just had happen at work what happened last fall on my home system: then, I had /dev/hda, and was trying a clean install on a new SATA drive; right now, I'm installing on a replacement disk on a server that has no CD/DVD drive from a USB key. My