similar to: keepalived segfault after upgrade to 7.4

Hey guys, I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an install from source. And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state. Here's more of that log entry: Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA Keepalived_vrrp[44943]: VRRP Instance = VI_1 Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA

Hello, We are using CentOS 6.6 and keepalived 1.2.13 on two servers for failover, no load-balancing. Failover is governed by the NIC being present, and the Apache and Tomcat processes being present. Both servers are configured as 'EQUAL' (not master/backup). An initial priority of 100 is set, and if a process or NIC fails, then this is reduced by 60 - causing a lower priority to be seen

Hi, I found some info messages below in /var/spool/mail/root. To reduce the size of that file, I'm wondering if there's a way to prevent those unimportant messages from entering /var/spool/mail/root. Thanks. 2010-05-10T10:32:27-05:00 <authpriv.info> se1 su: pam_unix(su-l:session): session closed for user root 2010-05-10T10:01:28-05:00 <local1.info> se1 Keepalived_vrrp:

Em 29-09-2015 15:03, Gordon Messmer escreveu: > On 09/29/2015 09:14 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: >> And if I do an ifconfig command I see no evidence of an eth1 existing. > > "ifconfig -a" will show you all of your interfaces. Maybe there is a confusion here. Sounds like Tim thought keepalived would create that eth1, like a tunnel interface, but it won't. You have to

I get this error starting tincd: tincd -n vpndr -d5 -D tincd 1.0.26 (Jan 22 2016 19:28:17) starting, debug level 5 /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Executing script tinc-up System call `getaddrinfo' failed: Name or service not known Terminating Also keepalived return an error when tincd start. Starting as a daemon. Joutnalctl show this: Jan 22 23:14:49 systemd[1]:

I tested a little more... tincd does not create virtual interface device correctly on CentOS 7, I don't know where tincd stop, probably on " System call `getaddrinfo' failed: Name or service not known" I sent you before. Keepalived return that error I shown on every ip command but this is not a problem now, I'll see this as soon as possible. If I execute these commands tun

Executing: ip tuntap add vpndrif mode tun return Keepalived errors show when tincd start: Jan 22 23:41:19 Keepalived_vrrp[1999]: Netlink: filter function error Jan 22 23:41:19 Keepalived_healthcheckers[1998]: Netlink: filter function error Jan 22 23:41:19 systemd-sysctl[23246]: Overwriting earlier assignment of kernel/shmmax in file '/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf'. Jan 22 23:41:19

Hello, I get this error when trying to build Keepalived 1.2.1 on a CentOS-4 box: # gcc -g -O2 (..) -D_WITH_LVS_ -D_WITH_VRRP_ -c smtp.c In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31, from ../include/smtp.h:34, from smtp.c:27: *../include/vrrp_ipaddress.h:32:27: linux/if_addr.h: No such file or directory* In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31,

Hello, First , thanks to Tom for it''s great job ! Netfilter is really easy and powerfull with shorewall. So, I have configured two firewalls whith shorewall using keepalived for the redundant VRRP stuff. FW-a is MASTER and FW-b is BACKUP. Everything works correctly and FW-b upgrade to MASTER when FW-a is down or disconnected. FW-b downgrade to BACKUP when FW-a comes back. But when I

I am trying to figure out a way to have the two packages running on the system. Is there a way to tell shorewall NOT to define IP addresses for a specific port so keepalived(vrrp) can create them and not cause a conflict. Or for that matter the other way around would work. Any help would be appreciated.

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0703 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0703.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 893386b534fbeda5a2f1702fab60cc087b037ece82635bb316c3e13fb5856e83 keepalived-1.2.13-5.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64:

Is anyone successfully using dag's keepalived-1.1.10-1.1.el3.rf on centos 3.4? It's giving me some strange issues (LVS Topology never shows up, even though I can manually set it w/ ipvsadm) Attempting to rebuild it has been less than successful, as anyone who tries will see in their appropriate BUILD/keepalived-1.1.10/config.log and in the rpmbuild output. It complains about openssl

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:1305 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1305.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 14c601eb6b4c0822d34a1d0b1feaca81c00f8dd95c1b4ea6a5dfd9d504185c25 keepalived-1.2.13-9.el7_3.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:1877 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:1877 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 259a12a1d3cd1c507dcfbd58d6d6fc63113a2e4ed7c1f5b061526d2426712b5c keepalived-1.3.5-8.el7_6.5.x86_64.rpm Source:

hello, all! if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ? tks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>

Hello, I've started reviewing HA solution for HAProxy and trying to decide between RHEL HA Add-on and KeeAlived. Just curious if anyone had a chance to use any of these technologies in a production environment? I would love to learn what your experience with these technologies is in terms of management, scaling, troubleshooting, and monitoring. I am leaning towards RHEL Add-on at the moment

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0022 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0022 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4171b23d7282f67bd3938bcac81eee43583a4936513b5e5346e958087bed3b86 keepalived-1.3.5-8.el7_6.x86_64.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project {

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1053 Bug ID: 1053 Summary: connection tracker integration issue Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: i386 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon Assignee:

On 09/29/2015 09:14 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > And if I do an ifconfig command I see no evidence of an eth1 existing. "ifconfig -a" will show you all of your interfaces.

I am currently using shorewall on leaf-bering. I have set it up with keepalived to create a high availabilty firewall cluster. I have an odd question in regards to shorewall. Currently in production I have keepalived controlling shorewall starts and stops. If I remove this and leave shorewall running on the backup firewall, will I run into any problems with having the nat tables built out and