similar to: workaround using CentOS Plus Kernel? -- for 7.4 does not support PV [Xen]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: > >> I experienced a bug that is likely the same as >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit >> b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it,

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: >>>

On 09/25/2020 05:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>>> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the

On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. >> >> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?

The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few changes for branding/artwork as we can. That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available, therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 1:03 AM John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:24 AM John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> strikes me, MPT2 support should find its home in the CentOSPlus kernel >> for 8. >> > > > ooof. IS there a CentOSplus 8 ?? >

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades >> as the dependencies are rather different. > > I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more > than a year with no problems. I don't

i'm reading the lowdown on 3rd party repos with respect to centos here: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories and i have a couple questions and observations. first, the entry for centosplus reads: "Popular packages from this repository include: postfix with database support, a rebuilt kernel with additional drivers & filesystem support, php5 and mysql5."

Helo, I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support. But when y do a : # yum update The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro I have tried with the http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it didn't take the right kernel :

Thank you for the great CentOS. When trying to update from 5.0 to 5.1, I get an error regarding the centos.plus kernel and headers, "[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download". What'd I do? The end of the yum update results below: Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 11 Package(s) Update

Hi, Small correction there. Example 4 of section 2 (how to use XFS with CentOSPlus kernel) says you should use this configuration line in [centosplus] section of yum: includepkgs=kernel* xfs* dmapi* However, the XFS module's package name is kmod-xfs*, so I believe it should actually be: includepkgs=kernel* kmod-xfs* xfs* dmapi* I did this on a system of mine, and in the first case it did

If it wouldn't be too much trouble ... when a kernel security update notice is posted to the announcements list, would it be possible to indicate whether the centosplus kernel is also susceptible to the security issue being patched? I'm running the plus kernel now, and find myself wondering whether I will ever need to back off to the base kernel because of security issues. Or is it

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: >> >>> I experienced a bug that is likely the same as >>>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett <ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com> wrote: > The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads: > "Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?" > The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus kernel. > Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-) Very sorry about that. Fixed it now. In

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 8:17 PM Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 8:04 PM William Markuske <wmarkuske at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I ... have come to find out that RedHat deprecated support for a number > of HBAs for 8 including all running the SAS2004 chip. > > > > Does anyone know if there

Hi Folks, I have some users who have a 64-bit CentOS 4.x install (current), which was installed with @Everything and then some annoying packages strategically removed (mrtg, pegasus*, mailman...) and they have decided they have a need for php5. I find on the web this instruction for doing this: http://www.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/Readme.txt So I try to do this, and I get: # rpm -e

On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > Has anybody enabled this repo? > I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > as the dependencies are rather different. I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more than a year with no problems. I don't recall reading anything on this mailing list or IRC suggesting that enabling plus caused issues with

On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: > >> Has anybody enabled this repo? > >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades > >> as the dependencies are rather different. >

I have a Centos 4 box that has been updated all the way to 4.6 without using the centosplus repository. Now I want to use the centosplus repository for Centos 4 to get the latest LAMP, mod_perl, perl and other perl modules so that I can install rt 3.6.6 and its necessary modules. However, for some reason, the latest perl package in the centosplus repository does not appear on the radar when

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:24 AM John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: > > strikes me, MPT2 support should find its home in the CentOSPlus kernel for > 8. > ooof. IS there a CentOSplus 8 ?? https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus doesn't say anything about it. -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz