similar to: KeePassX replacement

On 16/09/17 11:55, Tom Longfield wrote: > I have been using KeePassXC (though mostly on Debian) for quite a while > now and am happy to report it works well.? Nothing springs to mind that > annoys me and it's a decent drop in replacement. > My setup sounds pretty similar to your own (also use keepass2android, > though not KeePass on Windows). > > I would be inclined to

On Sat, September 16, 2017 1:45 pm, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for >> some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use >> KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I >> also sync the database between several machines,

I have been using KeePassXC (though mostly on Debian) for quite a while now and am happy to report it works well. Nothing springs to mind that annoys me and it's a decent drop in replacement. My setup sounds pretty similar to your own (also use keepass2android, though not KeePass on Windows). I would be inclined to compile from source yourself rather than use an unofficial repo you

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of FHDATA Sent: den 18 september 2017 18:10 To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> You may have reasons to prefer KeePassX over KeePass 2, though. > > I for one use keepassx. My password database

On Wed, September 21, 2016 4:30 pm, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2016-09-21, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 09/21/2016 11:30 AM, H wrote: >>> You are right, I'll look at it again. Let me ask, what other password >>> managers are people using, if any? >> >> >> I use keepass, but I know people who like: >> >>

On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote: > Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since keepassx seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. Which URL describes the bug? > The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for Firefox does not seem to be compatible... KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net application. KeepassX

Is anyone running keepass on C6? I have a rather large password database under Windows that I want also to use on my Centos systems. It seems that keepass is not available, it relies on mono and there may be bugs. Googling also seems to suggest that I should download the source code and compile to install. The nux repository seems to have a version for C7, but not for C6. Many suppositions and

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sat, September 16, 2017 1:45 pm, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> >>> I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for >>> some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use >>> KeePass which offers a number of features missing

Hi, On my workstation and my laptop I'm using KeePassXC to store login credentials for my websites. The database is stored in my OwnCloud share, so it's synchronized between my two computers. Ideally I'd like to have something similar for my servers, but command-line driven. I know these tools exist but I haven't tested them yet. What I have in mind is a command-line password

H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for > some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use > KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I > also sync the database between several machines, including Android > units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is

On 09/19/2017 05:18 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of FHDATA > Sent: den 18 september 2017 18:10 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >>> You may have reasons to prefer

On 09/21/2016 11:30 AM, H wrote: > You are right, I'll look at it again. Let me ask, what other password managers are people using, if any? I use keepass, but I know people who like: https://www.passwordstore.org/

On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 14:05 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote: > > ---> Package libgpg-error.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be an > > update > > ---> Package libgpg-error-debuginfo.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will > > be an update > > ---> Package libgpg-error-devel.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be > > an update > > The update for libgpg-error.i686

On 09/22/2016 11:38 AM, H wrote: > It seems this is only for C7? Why do you think that? I checked an RHEL 6 system for the required mono packages.

On 16/09/17 16:05, Phil Perry wrote: > The only other potential issue I see is that the latest KeePassXC > requires a newer version of libgcrypt, which the repo above packages as > libgcrypt16 (libgcrypt version 1.6.6) on el7. The release of 1.6 broke > ABI compatibility with version 1.5 in el7. I have not tried building > KeePassXC against libgcrypt-1.5 in el7 to know if that

On Tue, 5 May 2020 05:30:26 -0400 Eddie O'Connor wrote: > Are there .conf files for the desktop?....what about logs?....something's > got to be amiss somewhere....and Linux always complains when it is.....in > logs. Just wondering out loud... What happens if he sets up a new user? Does the desktop work then? -- Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one has a virus.

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Leon Fauster Sent: den 19 september 2017 13:44 To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement > Am 19.09.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>: > > Suggestions greatly appreciated! https://www.passwordstore.org/ --

On Tue, September 19, 2017 4:18 am, Sorin Srbu wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of FHDATA > Sent: den 18 september 2017 18:10 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >>> You may have reasons

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:11:50PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 10/15/19 10:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > This is interesting and promising: > > > > "The official unofficial repository for MATE for EL8.": > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neonman/MATE/ > > The previous link is forked repo (I do not know why) and here is >

I finally decided to move from CentOS 6 to CentOS 7, but was surprised to see that kmail is no longer included: Red Hat deliberately decided to omit it. How can I ask that kmail be added to EPEL? The information on EPEL's site basically says to submit it myself, but that's above my capabilities. -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca>