similar to: selinux prevents lighttpd from printing

On 09/20/2017 07:19 AM, hw wrote: > hw wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> how do I allow CGI programs to print (using 'lpr -P some-printer >> some-file.pdf') when >> lighttpd is being used for a web server? >> >> When selinux is permissive, the printer prints; when it?s enforcing, >> the printer >> does not print, and I?m getting the log

PS: Now I found this: type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : proctitle=/usr/lib/sendmail -t -oi -oem -fwawi-genimp type=SYSCALL msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : arch=x86_64 syscall=setgroups success=no exit=EPERM(Operation not permitted) a0=0x1 a1=0x7ffc1df3b0d0 a2=0x0 a3=0x7f5d77c3a300 items=0 ppid=19417 pid=19418 auid=unset uid=lighttpd gid=lighttpd euid=root

Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 09/22/2017 06:58 AM, hw wrote: >> >> PS: Now I found this: >> >> >> type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : proctitle=/usr/lib/sendmail -t -oi -oem -fwawi-genimp >> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : arch=x86_64 syscall=setgroups success=no exit=EPERM(Operation not permitted) a0=0x1

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/20/2017 07:19 AM, hw wrote: >> hw wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> how do I allow CGI programs to print (using 'lpr -P some-printer >>> some-file.pdf') when >>> lighttpd is being used for a web server? >>> >>> When selinux is permissive, the printer prints; when it?s enforcing,

On 09/22/2017 06:58 AM, hw wrote: > > PS: Now I found this: > > > type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : > proctitle=/usr/lib/sendmail -t -oi -oem -fwawi-genimp > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : arch=x86_64 > syscall=setgroups success=no exit=EPERM(Operation not permitted) > a0=0x1 a1=0x7ffc1df3b0d0 a2=0x0 a3=0x7f5d77c3a300

hw wrote: > > Hi, > > how do I allow CGI programs to print (using 'lpr -P some-printer some-file.pdf') when > lighttpd is being used for a web server? > > When selinux is permissive, the printer prints; when it?s enforcing, the printer > does not print, and I?m getting the log message '/bin/lpr: Permission denied'. > > 'getsebool -a | grep

On 04/12/2016 02:31 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > For example: > > unless => "/usr/sbin/getsebool httpd_can_network_connect | /usr/bin/grep on > &> /dev/null" D'oh! That's what I get for overcomplicating the whole darn thing. :) > > Incidentally one nice trick if you're dealing with potentially changing > multiple booleans and the policy compile

Out of faint curiosity, how do we push change requests upstream to RHEL? I'm using puppet to automate systems, including the application of SELinux policy. While setsebool -P is non-damaging to repeat, it is time consuming -- taking about 45 seconds per execution to process the existing policy and re-commit to disk. I'd like a simple ability to put an unless in the execution of

SELinux appears to be interfering with winbind's functionality. I have the lastest policy package installed: selinux-policy-targeted-1.17.30-2.149 which allegedly solves this problem according to the RedHat knowledge base, but clearly does not. I have to turn off SELinux by using setenforce 0 (permissive) to get winbind to work at all, and based on what I see in the log files,

Hi On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Myyr?, Timo <timo.myyra at edita.fi> wrote: > I just did a bit of testing on OpenBSD and there the above setup seems to > work and I can remove the files just fine over sftp. > So this thing should work but there's still something causing it to fail on > CentOS's side. > Just as a question is SELinux enabled ? ]# getenforce

Hi, how do I allow lighttpd access to a directory like this: dr-xrwxr-x. lighttpd example unconfined_u:object_r:samba_share_t:s0 files_articles I tried to create and install a selinux module, and it didn?t work. The non-working module can not be removed, either: semodule -r lighttpd-files_articles.pp libsemanage.semanage_direct_remove_key: Unable to remove module lighttpd-files_articles.pp at

I keep seeing this in my audit.logs: type=AVC msg=audit(1496336600.230:6): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=2411 comm="dbus-daemon" dest=111 scontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:portmap_port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket Was caused by: The boolean allow_ypbind was set incorrectly. Description: Allow system to run with NIS Allow

Hi folks, I've been googling for an hour on this which seems to be awfully basic. But I cannot find anything definitive. [root at centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: Access denied [root at centos-gig ~]# setenforce 0 [root at centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory Have tried things like : chcon

On 12 Apr 2016 6:10 p.m., "John Jasen" <jjasen at realityfailure.org> wrote: > > Out of faint curiosity, how do we push change requests upstream to RHEL? > > I'm using puppet to automate systems, including the application of > SELinux policy. While setsebool -P is non-damaging to repeat, it is time > consuming -- taking about 45 seconds per execution to

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, John Jasen wrote: > On 04/12/2016 02:31 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> For example: >> >> unless => "/usr/sbin/getsebool httpd_can_network_connect | /usr/bin/grep on >> &> /dev/null" > > D'oh! That's what I get for overcomplicating the whole darn thing. :) >> >> Incidentally one nice trick if you're

Hi folks, I can't seem to log into my system via vsftpd. All other services using PAM are fine...Am I missing something simple? ftp> user (username) user 331 Please specify the password. Password: 530 Login incorrect. # getenforce Permissive here is the event in /var/log/audit/audit.log: type=USER_AUTH msg=audit(1247235151.569:9781): user pid=21052 uid=0 auid=0

At work I'm used to tools like eTrust Access Control (aka SEOS). eTrust takes away the ability to manage the eTrust config from root and puts it in the hands of "security admin". So there's a good separation of duties; security admin control the security ruleset, but are limited by the OS permissions (so even if they granted themselves permission to modify /etc/shadow, the

On 12/28/16, 3:28 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: On 12/28/2016 06:13 PM, Greg Cornell wrote: > On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J

I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6 virtual guest: ---- time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698 pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2784 comm="trivial-rewrite"

hi Just wondering if there is any statiscs report of selinxu usages in production environment? I know some still turn it off. thanks. min