similar to: JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:26 PM, ejm <mansky at mindspring.com> wrote: >> When I put in http it changes it back to https > > That's common now that everyone puts re-directs in to force everyone to use https. > > Can you get to the Apache logs on the remote machine? They may have more info. > > The error about Java 1.8 might be a red-herring. > > If the

Hi all, Will ldd display the paths to different libraries depending on their locations? I'm trying to build libxml2 version 2.9.6 in /usr/local with a newer version of zlib (1.2.8) than what are in the system folders for CentOS 6.8. I get the following output from ldd: $ ldd ./libxml2.so ./libxml2.so: /lib64/libz.so.1: version `ZLIB_1.2.3.3' not found (required by ./libxml2.so)

Hi Philippe, To get wine-32 to work on CentOS 7.6 I had to build and install wine 1.8.4 from a tarball. Follow the instructions at: https://wiki.winehq.org/Building_Wine and build the 64-bit version first, then the 32-bit version. Before building either version I installed the following X11 devel pkgs from yum: libX11-devel.i686 libxcb-devel.i686 libXext-devel.i686 Depending on your setup

I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. If I go to http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-2133155.html and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone know where I can get 8.1?

Hello, Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you can see. Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again. Kind regards El 14 sept. 2017 5:55 p. m., "Larry Martell" <larry.martell at gmail.com> escribi?: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell

> I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 is/was 1.7; JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera). > If I go to http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-21331 55.html > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone know where I can get 8.1?

On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. > > > > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 > > is/was 1.7; > > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera). > >

On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > > I have some

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. > > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 is/was 1.7; > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera). > >> If I go to > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-21331 > 55.html

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247

On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: >> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser >> to make sure, that the right java version is activated. > > This is what I get from that: > > application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar That's OpenJDK instead

On 9/14/2017 10:43 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Jose wrote: >> Hello, >> Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you >> can see. >> Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again. > Or change alternatives, or set JAVA_HOME. Or, change the path.? the java command sets java_home internally based on where its invoked from. --

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:51 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 9/14/2017 10:43 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Jose wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you >>> can see. >>> Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again. >> >> Or

On 15.09.2017 00:59, Larry Martell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: >>> This is what I get from that: >>> >>> application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar >> >> That's OpenJDK instead of Oracle. > > Do you know how I can associate IcedTea with Oracle's JRE? You can try to replace the icedtea

> Contacting IBM now. In case they don't suggest it, try connecting with http instead of https to see if it's actually an SSL certificate problem.

On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote: > Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser. Is the java plugin enabled in your browser? That's not the default nowadays. if you are running firefox you can check this by opening 'about:plugins'. here - configured for older HP ILOs - for example, the plugin is linked into my firefox profile: [ulf at bob ~]$ ll

On 14 September 2017 at 14:51, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: >> On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote: >> >>> Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser. >> >> Is the java plugin enabled in your browser? That's not the default

On 14.09.2017 21:26, Larry Martell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: >> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not >> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the >> openjdk with the system and some pointing the one you tried to >> install. I don't know how

On 18.09.2017 16:35, Larry Martell wrote: > My old version of FF does not have plugin folder, it has a file called > pluginreg.dat that looks like this: i doubt that. Please look into /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins or /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins. i'm quite sure that these directories also exist in you ff v24. pluginreq.dat should only cache the plugin informations and can be renamed.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 18.09.2017 16:35, Larry Martell wrote: > >> My old version of FF does not have plugin folder, it has a file called >> pluginreg.dat that looks like this: > > i doubt that. Please look into > > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins or /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins. i'm quite sure > that these