similar to: JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "JRE 8.1 for CentOS6"

2017 Sep 14
7
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. >> > >> > That's very odd, since
2017 Sep 14
2
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. > > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 is/was 1.7; > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera). > >> If I go to > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-21331 > 55.html
2017 Sep 14
3
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
Jose wrote: > Hello, > Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you > can see. > Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again. Or change alternatives, or set JAVA_HOME. mark > Kind regards > > El 14 sept. 2017 5:55 p. m., "Larry Martell" <larry.martell at gmail.com> > escribi?: > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at
2017 Sep 14
0
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
> I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 is/was 1.7; JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera). > If I go to http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-21331 55.html > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone know where I can get 8.1?
2017 Sep 14
0
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. > > > > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 > > is/was 1.7; > > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera). > >
2017 Sep 14
0
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > > I have some
2017 Sep 14
0
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
Hello, Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you can see. Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again. Kind regards El 14 sept. 2017 5:55 p. m., "Larry Martell" <larry.martell at gmail.com> escribi?: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell
2017 Sep 14
1
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247
2017 Sep 14
2
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 14.09.2017 21:26, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not >>> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the >>>
2017 Sep 14
3
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > >>> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser >>> to make sure, that the right java version is activated. >> >> This
2008 Sep 14
1
[LLVMdev] xcodebuild and LLVM
On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote: > Hi John, > > I'm not certain if libtool works with LLVM bitcode files, and I don't > think that all of the tools that manipulate/inspect object files on > Mac OS X understand bitcode files either. Yes. Right now only ld recognizes LLVM bitcode files. > I suspect that this will > change over time. Yes. - Devang
2017 Sep 14
0
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: >> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser >> to make sure, that the right java version is activated. > > This is what I get from that: > > application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar That's OpenJDK instead
2016 Dec 22
2
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
Here's our testcase: #include <stdio.h> struct flags { unsigned frog: 1; unsigned foo : 1; unsigned bar : 1; unsigned bat : 1; unsigned baz : 1; unsigned bam : 1; }; int main() { struct flags flags; flags.bar = 1; flags.foo = 1; if (flags.foo == 1) { printf("Pass\n"); return 0; } else {
2016 Dec 22
0
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
On 12/21/2016 4:45 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote: > Here's our testcase: > > #include <stdio.h> > > struct flags { > unsigned frog: 1; > unsigned foo : 1; > unsigned bar : 1; > unsigned bat : 1; > unsigned baz : 1; > unsigned bam : 1; > }; > > int main() { > struct flags flags; > flags.bar = 1; >
2007 Aug 03
0
tomcat error on x86_64 with 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen & jre 1.6.*
I get the same error as this person: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=9349 Like the poster, I get the error with tomcat 6.0.13 on x86_64, kernel 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen and both jre 1.6.0_01 and 1.6.0_02 When I revert to jre 5u12 on the same kernel, I don't get the problem. If I stay with jre 6, but use kernel 2.6.18-8.el5, I also don't get the error. So
2004 Aug 05
0
java jre cross-applet priviledge escalation
Hi, THe problem is described in: http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert/57613 Does anybody know if native built java port ver. 1.4.2-p6 is affected by this? If yes, does reinstalling the port using the new Sun archive solves the issue? TIA, /Dorin. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
2005 Nov 02
3
JRE for x86_64
Does anyone know if the folks at Sun have put out a jre version to work with the x86_64 version of CentOS? If not, is there even any possibility of it occuring? Thanks.. Sam -- Snowman
2010 Jan 31
1
Can't get JRE 1.6U18 to run
Hi, I have installed WINE 1.1.32 on fedora 12 and I am trying to get Sun Java JRE running but have a few issues: If I pick up the JRE installer .EXE file, it fails to install and this seems to be down to a heap space allocation error. I have found a few posts around the Internet about this but nothing gets me towards a fix. What I am actually trying to do is run a jnlp installer package and if
2007 Apr 15
1
Question regarding debugging JRE problem
Hello, I'm trying to debug a wine bug with the java runtime environment. I'm now in the native c++ code and have the problem, that there are no debug symbols available. As the source is available, I had the idea to compile it myself with debug symbols but I have no idea how to start compiling this under linux+wine. Has someone done this before and give me some hints? Thanks in advance
2007 May 19
1
Using an already installed Linux JRE from WINE
I've installed the Windows application Open WorkBench* which is coded in C, C++ and Java. When I install it under WINE, it installs fine, but when I run it, it gives a 'JRE is not installed' error message. I have a Linux JRE already installed. Do I have to install a Windows JRE? Or is there a way of telling WINE about the Linux JRE I already have installed?