similar to: Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. > Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. > > Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? > > I am assuming they will up-version from 6.9 to 6.10 and as part of > that upgrade from

On 09/12/2017 02:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. >> Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. >> >> Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? >> >> I am

On Sep 12, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. > Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. > > Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? > > I am assuming they will up-version from 6.9 to 6.10 and as part of > that upgrade from Apache 2.2 to

> I don't have any official knowledge, but I would suspect that they will > maintain httpd-2.2 throughout the lifetime of RHEL6. Security issues > would be backported. (If older versions of RHEL are any indication) The basic problem is though that there won't be any security fixes for 2.2 How can they back port something that does not exist? Or do you mean you think

I searched the list archives and I found one answer to this which suggested I should install the PG yum repos. I don't like that answer for reasons which follow. I'm running Centos 6.0 freshly installed, and I've decided that with this box I'm sticking as much as possible to just the CentOS repos that go with that release. I figure in particular I do not need any PG features

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Here's a classic example: somewhere in the updates of RH 7.2, > the apache DSO module for mod_perl was finally compiled with > the correct options and became usable as shipped so people > running web sites with it no longer had to recompile apache > with mod_perl included statically. This was also supplied > in the 7.3

Hello, If you're interested in running Xen 4.0 hypervisor/dom0 on RHEL6, take a look at here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial It explains steps needed to rebuild Xen 4.0.1 src.rpm from Fedora on RHEL6, and how to fetch dom0 capable 2.6.32.x kernel from upstream git repository. It also shows how to get libvirt/virt-manager working with Xen on RHEL6. Hopefully it helps :) --

Hello, If you're interested in running Xen 4.0 hypervisor/dom0 on RHEL6, take a look at here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial It explains steps needed to rebuild Xen 4.0.1 src.rpm from Fedora on RHEL6, and how to fetch dom0 capable 2.6.32.x kernel from upstream git repository. It also shows how to get libvirt/virt-manager working with Xen on RHEL6. Hopefully it helps :) --

I need to install rpy2 on RHEL6. The version of R in the 6 repos is 3.0, and rpy2 does not work with that version. I installed R 3.3.3 following the directions here: https://oguya.ch/posts/2017-03-18-building-R-on-rhel-6/. But even with 3.3.3 it's still failing. Using pip it fails with: /usr/local/lib64/R/lib/libR.a(CommandLineArgs.o): could not read symbols: Bad value and installing from

Anyone had tried the save/restore against rhel6 guest? I found it always throw timeout when I tried to save the guest. And only fail with rhel6 guest.(ubuntu, fedora are ok). best regards yang _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

It turns out augeas on RHEL6 is 0.7.2, which does not have ''setm'' command available. ''setm'' is available in augeas release 0.8, which is available in EPEL, but not available for RHEL6 (the reason is the package is already in RHEL6, thus no package would be released in EPEL for this. All I want to do is to put console=ttyS0 on all kernel lines in /etc/grub.conf.

The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6. I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what is minimally necessary go from RHel6 to another distribution. I suppose we could discuss "Paul Linux 6" instead of Centos, if that makes you feel more comfortable. (and not

> On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > > I need to install rpy2 on RHEL6. The version of R in the 6 repos is > 3.0, and rpy2 does not work with that version. I installed R 3.3.3 > following the directions here: > https://oguya.ch/posts/2017-03-18-building-R-on-rhel-6/. But even with > 3.3.3 it's still failing. Using pip it

https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an old version of gtk2. If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was planning on using C6 for a long time. Does anyone know of a repo that intends to keep Chromium working

I am trying to install R 3.4.0 on RHEL6. If I look here is it there: http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/fedora-epel/6/x86_64/ I did this: sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-optional-rpms sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-extras-rpms wget https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-6.noarch.rpm rpm epel-release-latest-6.noarch.rpm Which all

Hi, First, Timo, Thank you for Dovecot 2.1.0. I've built Dovecot 2.1.0 RPMs including Dovecot-Pigeonhole 0.3.0 for RHEL6, CentOS 6 and Scientific Linux 6. If anyone is interested in testing these RPMs: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/dovecot/2.1.0/ Feedback would be appreciated. After some testing, we will use these RPMs on our IMAP servers. Best regards, Morten

I have a RHEL6 that hosts many kvm virtual machines. It has been working fine for a couple years. I apply errata updates about once a week. In the last couple weeks, I've ran into a bug where the virtual machines start failing to start with a cgroup error message. If I reboot the host (very disruptive) then things start working normaly for a few days. Can I configure qemu/libvirt not to use

Hey folks, I''ve encountered a rather interesting/frustrating issue with RHEL6 domU''s and live migration. I have no problems booting a RHEL6 domU using its stock/native kernel on Xen 3.4.1 or Xen 3.4.3. But in terms of live migration, there seems to be a problem when moving from a higher (in terms of CPU MHz) to lower (MHz) system -- even if the higher of the two is a much

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/21/2017 11:18 AM, Larry Martell wrote: >> I am trying to install R 3.4.0 on RHEL6. If I look here is it there: >> >> http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/fedora-epel/6/x86_64/ >> >> I did this: >> >> sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-optional-rpms

We have done some benchmarking tests using dovecot 2.0.12 to find the best shared filesystem for hosting many users, here I share with you the results, notice the bad perfomance of all the shared filesystems against the local storage. Is there any specific optimization/tunning on dovecot for use GFS2 on rhel6??, we have configured the director to make the user mailbox persistent in a node, we will