similar to: Xen PV DomU's and the 3.10.0-693.el7 Kernel

On 08-09-2017 6:17, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:21 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 08:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>>> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:

On 09/06/2017 08:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>>> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote:

On 09/06/2017 05:21 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 09/06/2017 08:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>> On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:

On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: >>>>>> A recently created and fully functional CentOS

On 14-09-2017 20:57, Adi Pircalabu wrote: > On 08-09-2017 6:17, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 05:21 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 09/06/2017 08:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>> On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:

I''ve been trying to compare memory access speed between bare-metal, xen-pv and xen-pvhvm (hvm with pv drivers). In all 3 setups I''m running the same kernel (3.6.6), built with support for xen, on a 64 core AMD Opteron 6378. The output of xm info (relevant parts): machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 64 nr_nodes : 8 cores_per_socket : 16

Hi Jeremy, I backported the branch I have in linux-next plus some older PV on HVM fixes to stable-2.6.32.x. Please pull: git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git stable-2.6.32-pvhvm Ian Campbell (11): xen: do not respond to unknown xenstore control requests xen: use new schedop interface for suspend xen: switch to new schedop hypercall by default. xen:

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:07 PM, David Groep <davidg at nikhef.nl> wrote: > Dear all, > > Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that > the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue > 0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest" > re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But

Hi friend. I have a problem about using libvirt now. There is a feather about HVM driver ---PV_on_HVM_drivers, in xm configure, using flag xen_platform_pci can control the feather, but in libvirt I can not find the flags to use pv-on-HVM drivers. So I want to find the answer if the libvirt can control the modules using xml file? thanks a lot. best regards. zhong.chunshan

Hello, I'm looking for an example configuration for a PVHVM domU that works with 4.3.1. The one at http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Linux_PV_on_HVM_drivers causes 3 warnings and some errors: WARNING: ignoring "kernel" directive for HVM guest. Use "firmware_override" instead if you really want a non-default firmware WARNING: ignoring device_model directive. WARNING: Use

While installing the experemental kernel on a CentOS 7 PV the following happened. After a reboot of the PV the kernel looks to be installed but there is no option for booting it in grub. I attempted to run yum reinstall kernel-4.9.75-204.el7.centos.x86_64 and it installed fine but still no entry in grub. No initramfs existed and I found kernel-modules did not install properly so I then ran

Dear all, Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue 0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest" re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But maybe in a different way ... Thanks to the (great!) quick work on making the plus kernel available (in #14330,

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: >> >>> I experienced a bug that is likely the same as >>>

On 01/08/2018 02:10 PM, Shaun Reitan wrote: > While installing the experemental kernel on a CentOS 7 PV the following > happened. After a reboot of the PV the kernel looks to be installed but > there is no option for booting it in grub. ?I attempted to run yum > reinstall kernel-4.9.75-204.el7.centos.x86_64 and it installed fine but > still no entry in grub. No initramfs existed and

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: > >> I experienced a bug that is likely the same as >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit >> b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it,

On Mar 20, 2014 11:40 PM, Waiman Long <waiman.long at hp.com> wrote: > > On 03/19/2014 04:28 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >> This patch adds a XEN init function to activate the unfair queue > >> spinlock in a XEN guest when the PARAVIRT_UNFAIR_LOCKS kernel config > >> option is

On Mar 20, 2014 11:40 PM, Waiman Long <waiman.long at hp.com> wrote: > > On 03/19/2014 04:28 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >> This patch adds a XEN init function to activate the unfair queue > >> spinlock in a XEN guest when the PARAVIRT_UNFAIR_LOCKS kernel config > >> option is

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman <srn at prgmr.com> wrote: > I experienced a bug that is likely the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ > ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit > b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it, > doesn't appear in this kernel and doesn't apply cleanly either. > Is there any point in trying to

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com >>> > wrote:

Hello, After saving and restoring a DomU (teste on the same server), doing a reboot to the newly restored domU will cause it to crash. This happens on PV and PVHVM domUs. I am using qemu upstream for the HVM guests, but I don''t really think it matters as long as PV guests behave the same. I want to confirm this if possible, before submitting a bug report and more details. I am using