similar to: Lenovo T460p post 7.4 CR possible problems

On 26 August 2017 at 14:42, <mad.scientist.at.large at tutanota.com> wrote: > It means it's time to open up your' laptop and evict all the dust bunnies. it's overheating on one desktop but not the other because one of your' desktops, as configured on your system is using the processor more. this is how laptops die as most people just whine and complain as their'

Also try package lm_sensors and its command sensors-detect, maybe just the temperature sensors are not properly initialized On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 8:42 PM, <mad.scientist.at.large at tutanota.com> wrote: > It means it's time to open up your' laptop and evict all the dust > bunnies. it's overheating on one desktop but not the other because one of > your' desktops,

It means it's time to open up your' laptop and evict all the dust bunnies.? it's overheating on one desktop but not the other because one of your' desktops, as configured on your system is using the processor more.? this is how laptops die as most people just whine and complain as their' laptop gets slower and less stable.? the first part to fail is often the hard drive.?

On 03/21/2017 07:48 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Ricardo J. Barberis > <ricardo at palmtx.com.ar <mailto:ricardo at palmtx.com.ar>> wrote: > > El Lunes 20/03/2017, PJ Welsh escribi?: > > Still just starts the kernel and wihtin 4 seconds reboots with 4.9.16-24. > > Thanks > > PJ > > Edit grub's entry

[ 0.000000] microcode: CPU0 microcode updated early to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29 [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.4.0-rc3+ (airlied at crackbookpro) (gcc version 5.1.1 20150618 (Red Hat 5.1.1-4) (GCC) ) #44 SMP Sat Dec 5 16:05:39 AEST 2015 [

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a 6.3 guest running on a 6.3 host and the output from top seems strange to me. At least I did not expect this. While in the guest on core is busy with i/o the host seems idle. Does anyone know why it is this way? See the output from top below, first the one from guest, then host. top - 14:12:35 up 12 min, 1 user, load average: 2.76,

Hello All, I have 2 Digium card configure on Single machine, which can't share interrupt across all CPUs and sometimes asterisk reach 100% CPU usage. Here is system details and /proc/interrupt o/p. OS: CentOS 6.4 Kernel: 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 Dahdi Version: DAHDI Version: 2.7.0.2 Echo Canceller: HWEC Asterisk Version: 1.8.13.0 Output: /proc/interrupts cat /proc/interrupts

Adds Nouveau controlled thermal throttling for Kepler+ GPUs. With this I feel safe enough to add support for Maxwell2 reclocking later on (still hidden behind a switch, but we can be fairly sure to not overheat hardware if a user isn't carefull enough) Contains all patches from my clk update series, but I thought it makes sense to include those in this series as well for completness. Please

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89558 Bug ID: 89558 Summary: Unknown chipset error for GeForce 840M Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100423 Bug ID: 100423 Summary: MMIO read of 00000000 FAULT at 022554 [ IBUS ] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

Dear group I had a R ? program that was to slow, I mad it multi core prog..to speed up, its a simulation when the runs are 100 its very fast..raising the runs to 10k mad it in the first fast then it slow down I checked the HW usafe and here is the top command results %Cpu0 ?:100.0 us, ?0.0 sy, ?0.0 ni, ?0.0 id, ?0.0 wa, ?0.0 hi, ?0.0 si, ?0.0 st %Cpu1 ?:100.0 us, ?0.0 sy, ?0.0 ni, ?0.0 id, ?0.0

Hi Team Can someone advice me on how i can lower the load average on my asterisk server? dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 dahdi-tools-2.1.0.2 libpri-1.4.10.1 asterisk-1.4.25.1 2 X TE412P Digium cards on ISDN PRI Im using the system as an IVR without any transcoding or bridging ************************************** top - 10:27:57 up 199 days, 5:18, 2 users, load average: 67.75, 62.55, 55.75 Tasks: 149

How necessary is it to run this gem on a desktop with a constant power supply? It doesn't seem to be all that useful, except if there's some significant power consumption advantage to lowering the cpu speed. Doesn't the CPU run at full speed unless throttled down by temperature, or is that what this thing does (for desktops)? Thanks. Mark Hull-Richter, Linux Kernel Engineer

Is there anything I can do in this regard? /smo On 2016-03-31 23:12, Pierre Moreau wrote: > Oh, hum, GM108 is NV118 and not NV108 which is Gk208… My bad! > > SMF from the bug report seemed to have some working setup, and since he didn't > pinged back, I guess it's working nicely. But some more checking might still be > needed? > > On 04:59 PM - Mar 31 2016, Ilia

Ok, So this is really more of an observation than anything else.? I had a FreeBSD 10.1 server that was running great. Some SSL issue came up, or I upgrade Dovecot in ports - something occurred and the machine started rebooting randomly.? It would run for 2 weeks, then reboot.? It might run for 5 days and then reboot. So I started doing more FreeBSD upgrades, thinking it was a kernel issue. The

Hi, I have installed b_78 on a Dell 2950 and booting to bare metal works fine but when I try to boot using the grub entry Solaris xVM it will boot to the point where it displays the uname info and then just stays there. It will not boot past that point. I have enabled VT technology in the BIOS (but only after the installation). Where/what can I look at to trouble shoot this? I am new to xen and

I do not seem to be able to get any where with the power management functions. I have had a look at the xenpm Wiki page, but it hasn''t helped. Its probably something completely obvious, but I can''t see it. I running Xen 3.4.0 on Centos 5.3 x86_64 using the gitco RPMs on an Intel S5000PSL motherboard with 2 x Xeon 5410s. Dom0 is running the latest Centos 5.3 kernel. My xm

Hi, On a Asterisk 1.8.12 system working OK for months (>100k calls proceed), users are complaining for bad audio. My setup is: PSTN <--E1/PRI ---> Asterisk <--- E1/PRI---> Siemens HiPath <---E1/PRI ---> PSTN asterisk -rx "dahdi show version" DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r10414 Echo Canceller: HWEC asterisk -rx "pri show version" libpri version: 1.4.12 A

I am playing around with irqbalance to tune my 8 core system so I came across this page, http://kb.fusionio.com/KB/a65/irqbalance-avoid-overloading-cpu-0-with-interrupt-requests.aspx Now, lets say I disable irqbalance which will stop my autobalance and I pin all of my interrupts to core 0 and pin eth0 and eth1 to core 1. My application is network and CPU hungry. I am planning to dedicate cpu 3 to

Hi, I recently updated from puppet 3.1.1 to 3.2.1 and noticed quite a bit of increased load on the puppetmaster machine. I''m using the Apache/passenger/rack way of puppetmastering. Main symptom is: higher load on puppetmaster machine (8 cores): - 3.1.1: around 4 - 3.2.1: around 9-10 Any idea why there''s more load on the machine with 3.2.1? -- You received this