similar to: Updated Apache httpd packages?

On 08/22/2017 03:21 AM, Rainer Traut wrote: > > > Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm: >> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/ >> errata/RHSA-2017:2479 >> >> I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ >> 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is >> there a

Am 23.08.2017 um 16:31 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 08/22/2017 03:21 AM, Rainer Traut wrote: >> >> >> Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm: >>> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/ >>> errata/RHSA-2017:2479 >>> >>> I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ >>>

On 08/24/2017 06:57 AM, Rainer Traut wrote: > > Am 23.08.2017 um 16:31 schrieb Johnny Hughes: >> On 08/22/2017 03:21 AM, Rainer Traut wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm: >>>> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/ >>>> errata/RHSA-2017:2479 >>>>

Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm: > I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/ > errata/RHSA-2017:2479 > > I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ > 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is > there a roadmap for when Centos 7 will receive the fix? > > Thanks! You can switch to

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 02:40:59PM -0500, Erik Osterholm wrote: > I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/ > errata/RHSA-2017:2479 > > I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ > 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is > there a roadmap for when Centos 7 will receive the fix? It's being held

Hi list, is there any working solution for deduplication of data for centos? We are trying to find a solution for our backup server which runs a bash script invoking xdelta(3). But having this functionality in fs is much more friendly... We have looked into lessfs, sdfs and ddar. Are these filesystems ready to use (on centos)? ddar is sthg different, I know. Thx Rainer

Hi, am using latest C6 on a Dell GX270 with latest Bios. It fails to power down but restarts when running $ sudo poweroff I tried some google hints for kernel boot option: acpi=force no help, looks like acpi is working anyway when looking in dmesg acpi=off makes e1000 nic fail to initialize Any suggestions? Rainer

Hi, Kopete does not show any contact in ICQ... Will there be fixes for this? Or do I have to wait for kde-redhat to support centos5? Thx Rainer

Hi, I need to transfer a local raw image to another datacenter. Is there a way to achieve good compression of this image, I heard of tools overwriting unused space with zeros. Is this a good idea? It's an W2k8 image/NTFS. Thx Rainer

Hi List, I'm looking for an editor with file compare capabilities. Gedit and kate don't seem to do this? Thx Rainer

Hi List, hope this is not too offtopic, but this bothers me and my backup. My backups are tar jobs in cron, eg: 20 23 * * * tar -zcf /mnt/backupInternalHosts/backup/backup.tar.gz /etc /root /home && touch /tmp/state_backup-backup This always sends me an unwanted email with: tar: Removing leading `/' from member names I consider this a bug because this informal message is

I'm trying to find out if a particular RedHat patch has been ported to CentOS yet. In particular, this vulnerability: CVE-2011-3607 According to this: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0323.html it has been patched as of httpd-2.2.3-63.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm Now, in the latest CentOS repository, I find httpd-2.2.3-63.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm Is this the same (or later) release? I suspect

Hi, I know, epel has rt3 in version 3.6.x. And - sadly - for version 3.8.x the perl module dependencies are way ahead of what I can find in epel or rpmforge. But we really need some of the 3.8.x series features. So has anybody maybe built those modules + rt3 v3.8.x for C5? Any hint? I really do not want to install f10. :O Thx Rainer

Hi all, I have followed the wiki howto to install KVM on my C5 server with a F10 x86_64 guest. Howto here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM With one small problem here: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=74275&topic_id=19726 the guest is really running stable for one week now. Maybe someone could have a look at udev why it always sets permission for /dev/net/tun

Hi, I am running C6.5 64bit on an USB stick connected to a HP DL360G7; It is usually an ESXi host but eg for firmware updates (not available on SPP) I use this local installation. Problem are the lags and unresponsiveness we are seeing for example when running yum update in the installation phase. The whole system stalls but there is no io in vmstat. From what google tells us, this is a

There is an update to httpd and mod_ssl for CentOS-3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-084.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-32.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-32.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-32.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-32.ent.centos.1.src.rpm These are available at

Hi, to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd I applied those iptables rules: -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 --name SSH --rsource -j DROP -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent --set --name SSH --rsource And this is part of logwatch: sshd: Authentication Failures: unknown

Dear all, will there be a fastrack channel for C5? What are the problems inventing one? Thx Rainer

Hi, sys: Centos 5.2 x86_64 Trying to switch from sendmail to postfix I did: # yum remove sendmail which resulted in erasing of: mdadm sendmail-doc sendmail sendmail-cf mutt fetchmail redhat-lsb I did then: yum -y install redhat-lsb.x86_64 postfix and got this error: Installing: postfix ######################### [1/2] postfix: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf:

Hi, is this the right place to ask for updated -extras- packages? this seems to be the successor of the 8.2.x branch and contains various bugfixes. Thx Rainer