similar to: Slow Samba

I hope that someone here can give some advice on the following: I have a Samba based Active Directory. A CentOS 7.6 machine runs as a file server and hosts the Windows user profiles for all the Windows workstations. Now management has decided that they need a Windows server for a couple of administrative applications, which need MS SQL Server. That would be the only role of this Windows.

Oh! It's works. Thanks a lot. God bless you all. --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em qui., 30 de mai. de 2024 ?s 10:40, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> escreveu: > For a GPO to work, both "Authenticated Users" and "Domain Computers" must > have "Read" rights. > > On a Policy Object, go to

>> Did you think to run 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --help' ? No, I didn't, I just assumed that the message "'samba' will remove them daily, 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' would do that immediately" would mean exactly that :-). It worked now. Thank you!

> On 04 Jun 2016, at 22:14, Miguel Medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >> Can someone therefore please explain to me what exactly these GPO >> restrictions are that Samba can't handle? I'd also appreciate if someone >> could list which other GPO I cannot set successfully using RSAT. > > It seems to me that the FAQ is pretty clear. The

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:32:01 +0100 "miguel medalha" <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >having a particular group > > > set as "Primary group" > > > How are setting the 'primary group' ? > > The 'primary group' had been set a long time ago, when the system was > created. It had been set with ADUC, under the

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:41:54 +0100 miguel medalha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello > > In one of my DCs, when I run ./configure for Samba 4.9.0, it fails > with the following message: > > Checking for lmdb >= 0.9.16 via header check : not > found Samba AD DC and --enable-selftest requires lmdb 0.9.16 or later > > My ./configure command

oh sorry I forgot to mention that actually, I did. ________________________________ From: miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 5:13 PM To: Emad Yousuf Said Al Kharusi; samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] error in samba 4.10.0 while using samba-tool domain provision > I'm using RHEL 7.4 > > I have built the samba from source, downloaded

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 16:17:20 +0100 "miguel medalha" <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >> It might help if you tell us what your actual './configure' was ? > > >> Something else might be pulling in the requirement for lmdb. > > Here it goes: > > ./configure -j 8 --with-systemd --with-statedir=/usr/local/samba/var >

For a GPO to work, both "Authenticated Users" and "Domain Computers" must have "Read" rights. On a Policy Object, go to "Delegation/Advanced"" and set those rights accordingly.

I'm using RHEL 7.4 I have built the samba from source, downloaded the tar file then extract ./configure make make install and I have installed all required packages and dependencies including gpgyme and I don't know why it's not working. ________________________________ From: Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 3:57 PM To: samba at

Please ask this question on the Samba list. The probability of getting an answer is higher there. samba at lists.samba.org

> > Finally 'browseable' is redundant on a Samba AD DC, there is no > browsing on an AD DC. > Well, sometimes you just *have* to do some file serving out of an AD DC. It happened to me. In that case, if you don't have "browsable = yes" on a share, that share will not appear in the Computer Management applet in Windows and you won't be able to set its

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:20:15 +0100 "miguel medalha" <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > > > By default, every AD user is a member of 'Domain Users' and so, > > > > when you use the 'rid' backend every Unix user gets the group as > > > > their primary group. > > > > > > > The only way to change this is by using

Let me be the first (maybe): CentOS 5.2 is here (at least): http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/ Thank you all who worked on it! -------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 22-06-2008 7:52

Hallo, works but must be licensed. Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 14.09.2019 um 19:01 schrieb Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>: > > >> On Sep 14, 2019, at 11:23, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: >> I hope that someone here can give some advice on the following: >> >> I have a Samba based Active Directory. A CentOS 7.6 machine

Hi list, Today, I spent most of the day figuring out why my password policies set via GPO are not applied on a domain level, just to find out that this is not one of the many occasions where Windows is the problem but it's really Samba, for a change. Apparently, password policies can only be changed using samba-tool and not via GPO. IMO, the FAQ is not very clear here.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Miguel Medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: >>> Could someone recommend good Linux software RAID primer. It would >> be good if it has good coverage of monitoring and dealing with failures. > > https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid +1 and practice recovery scenarios using VMs with virtual disks. -- Arun Khan

On Sep 14, 2019, at 11:23, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > I hope that someone here can give some advice on the following: > > I have a Samba based Active Directory. A CentOS 7.6 machine runs as a file server and hosts the Windows user profiles for all the Windows workstations. > > Now management has decided that they need a Windows server for a couple of

> What I do think is, it isn't a good idea to create Samba shares with > spaces in the name, use an underscore instead. Why? I have been using shares with spaces in their names for years without running into problems even once. Windows fully supports it, so should and does Samba. In a business environment you NEED proper, human readable names, not ugly convoluted substitutes. Just

I'm struggling with trying to create a unified, ldap-backed for my home network. I have an existing directory that handles my posix logins correctly and I'm able to auth smb users against those accounts, but I'm not able to join any machines to the directory. It would be profoundly helpful to see a ldif dump of a working configuration. Surely others have created similar setups at home