similar to: vfstp and renaiming of files with ftp client

Am 13.07.17 um 14:46 schrieb Pete Biggs: >> I have a vsftp server and two users for up and download. >> >> If user Alice uploads a file, the owner is set to Alice as expected >> "-rw-r--r-- alice ftpuploadgroup" >> >> Now Bob can login to the same folder and is able to rename the uploaded >> file. >> >> Bob can also rename an uploaded

Am 13.07.17 um 17:10 schrieb Tris Hoar: > On 13/07/2017 14:38, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >> Am 13.07.17 um 14:46 schrieb Pete Biggs: >>>> I have a vsftp server and two users for up and download. >>>> >>>> If user Alice uploads a file, the owner is set to Alice as expected >>>> "-rw-r--r-- alice ftpuploadgroup"

On 13/07/2017 14:38, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: > Am 13.07.17 um 14:46 schrieb Pete Biggs: >>> I have a vsftp server and two users for up and download. >>> >>> If user Alice uploads a file, the owner is set to Alice as expected >>> "-rw-r--r-- alice ftpuploadgroup" >>> >>> Now Bob can login to the same folder and is able

> > The permissions for the upload folder are drwx-wx--- and the owner is > Bob group is ftpuploadgroup > > Alice is member of that group, but should only drop files in. > > The files are ownd by Alice, and I'm bit iritated, taht Bob can rename > tham ... as Bob only has read permision (from the group) A directory is just a special file which holds information on

> > I have a vsftp server and two users for up and download. > > If user Alice uploads a file, the owner is set to Alice as expected > "-rw-r--r-- alice ftpuploadgroup" > > Now Bob can login to the same folder and is able to rename the uploaded > file. > > Bob can also rename an uploaded folder, but can't rename a file in that > folder .... >

> the goal is, that the FTP server is a Dropbox for Alice, so she can > upload files and folders and is not able to see the uploaded files > (drwx-wx--- for the main older). > > Bob should be able to rename the files and folders by ftp. (and of > course be able to download them.) > > If this is not possible with the standad permissions, I'm fine, in the > past

I have vsftp chrooted so that users can only come into their home directory. I have a few virtual hosts. I have the websites in the home directory of the intial user for each site. So the sites look like this. /home/user1/html /home/user2/html Using vsftp, I have set the default to chroot a user to their home directory. So user1 ftping in whill go right to his directory and not be able to go

Hi all, I want to run vsftp behind a firewall.(i.e DMZ zone) . It is runnig as passive ftp. the theroy behind passive ftp is , - FTP server's port 21 from anywhere ( Client initiates connection) - FTP server's port 21 to ports > 1024 (Server responds to client's control port) - FTP server's ports > 1024 from anywhere (Client initiates data connection to

Hi all, I want to run vsftp behind a firewall.(i.e DMZ zone) . It is runnig as passive ftp. the theroy behind passive ftp is , - FTP server''s port 21 from anywhere (Client initiates connection) - FTP server''s port 21 to ports > 1024 (Server responds to client''s control port) - FTP server''s ports > 1024 from anywhere (Client initiates data

Hi, I want to setup a ftp Server on CentOS 4.4. I will have to choose which ftp is IDLE among 3 ftp pkgs that are vsftp,wuftp or proftp? What do you recommend? -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070313/453527c8/attachment.html>

Hello guys, I would like to mount a sftp or a ftp with ssl (vsftp with ssl) on to a Windows machine as an X: drive. So far I found SftpDrive witch costs only $39 :) and I don't want it. Do any of you have a positive experience with something like this? I need it cause I will install a very important software on that drive, witch doesn't need to be on the local disk of the windows

I do not use ftp much lately, but my bro did and noticed we cannot ftp to the server since the upgrade. Using VSFTP. Tried rebooting but nothing. Looks like it goes through the whole process and then 'bam'. Could not find an error log that listed the error anywhere. Worked great before 5.4 update, now it does not work at all. Here is the info from cuteftp. STATUS:> Getting

Currently, a users directory is owned by the user and the group is ftp. The permissions are 775. In reading the MAN pages for vsftp, I do not see any other ways to retrict the user from just being able to view their won directory and the sub-dirs. Am I going wrong here? Todd -- Ariste Software 200 D Street Ext Petaluma, CA 94952 (707) 773-4523

I am in the process of bring up Centos 5.5. My ftp server is vsftp. When I add a user (e.g. brian), the "brian" directory is owned by "brian" and is in the "brian" group with 700 permissions. However, using a FTP client, the user "brian" can view all of the directories. I do not see any directive in vsftpd.conf to limit this. What have I missed?

I am moving from a server from running Red Hat 7.2 (with ProFTP) to Centos 3 (with vsFTP). There is a setting in ProFTP that lets me set the default ftp login directory for a specific user and I would like to do the same with vsFTP. The reason being is I have a 'webadmin' user that I use for uploading web content. I am thinking I could make the home directory of the webadmin /var/www in

Hi guys, Just a quick question, I've been slowly moving all my user services to mysql backend, I realise it's probably not as good a choice as LDAP, but you tend to stick with what you know. To that end I want to setup both Apache and VSFTP to use mysql db for virtual users. Basically I want to create virtual users that are locked into their own home dir and have apache use mysql to

I'm trying (and failing) to use BlockHosts to stop thousands of FTP login attempts. BlockHosts works fine with ssh but not with vsftp. I've found the problem but not the solution at http://www.aczoom.com/cms/forums/blockhosts/vsftp-hanging Can anyone could help with either getting BlockHosts to work or suggesting another method?

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] DNAT rule for vsftp (PASSIVE FTP) Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:17:42 +0530 From: Mohan Sundaram <smohan@vsnl.com> Reply-To: smohan@vsnl.com To: Indunil Jayasooriya <indunil75@gmail.com> References: <7ed6b0aa0710042251u6442fb85ma74e46aa9d3f81f9@mail.gmail.com> Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to run

I'm having an odd behavior with vsftp on all CentOS 4 servers... maybe 3 too, but I'm not on those much. I am transferring in port mode as I've never managed to get passive to work with a firewall running. Anyway, this is what happens. During normal transfers with few files.. it works perfectly. During the transfer of like a large website with hundreds of files in various

I've been struggling with my firewall and getting vsftp to work in passive mode. It seems that everything on this hosting server works just fine without the eth0 entry in my iptables except for vsftp in passive. Am I opening up too much by adding the eth0 line? -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT