similar to: OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter"

2017 Jun 09
1
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 6/9/2017 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: >> I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that >> can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. >> >> OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a >> device....:) >
2017 Jun 10
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 09/06/17 21:00, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device.... :) I would have answered "CentOS 7 on armhfp board" but your last requirement is the one
2017 Jun 11
5
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of > these over a RaspberryPI: > > Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on > the Centos-arm list. > Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow SD > card or a slow USB drive? I use Rasbian on my pi's.
2017 Jun 09
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device.... :) Raspberry Pi 3B ???? 35 bucks notincluding power supply or SD card. the
2017 Jun 11
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow SD card or a slow USB drive? See my install howto over at: http://www.htt-consult.com/Centos7-armv7.html And in fact, I have a LinkSprite
2017 Jul 25
2
ARM support from CentOS
Hello, I would like to know which ARM processors does CentOS support? Does it support Freescale/NXP? Thanks and regards Jay
2017 Jun 11
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 06/11/2017 01:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of >> these over a RaspberryPI: >> >> Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on >> the Centos-arm list. >> Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow
2017 Jun 11
0
OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 11/06/17 07:07, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of >> these over a RaspberryPI: >> >> Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on >> the Centos-arm list. >> Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow SD
2017 Mar 03
4
imaging a drive with dd
On 3/3/2017 5:34 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Well, I only wanted to copy the used part of the drive which I try to > keep small so I can still copy the image to an mSD card if I wish. So > I have to supply the amount of the drive to copy. The bs=512 went > fast enough, but then I was only copying 3.2GB. > > thanks for the help. personally, I would use 'dump' for
2018 Oct 01
3
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:25 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:24 PM JF Bastien <jfbastien at apple.com <mailto:jfbastien at apple.com>> wrote: >> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> (my vote, somewhat biased - is that
2018 Oct 01
4
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > (my vote, somewhat biased - is that I'd love to see more investment in Bloaty (to keep all these sort of size analysis tools and tricks in one place), but sort of accept folks are probably going to keep building more infrastructure for this sort of thing in LLVM directly) I get where that comes
2018 Sep 26
5
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
Hello, I worked on a code size analysis tool for a 'week of code' project and think that it might be useful enough to upstream. The tool is inspired by bloaty (https://github.com/google/bloaty), but tries to do more to attribute code size in actionable ways. For example, it can calculate how many bytes inlined instances of a function added to a binary. In its diff mode, it can show how
2013 Dec 02
7
Stuck trying to boot Xen 4.3 on Arm Midway
I am trying to extract and combine the various pieces of information found in [1] and its sub-pages and the Xen in-tree documentation in order to make xen boot (potentially non-smp without some later changes). But since I am not familiar enough with Arm I think I am stuck doing something wrong. I compiled the hypervisor with debug and early printk for midway and use the xen.bin file (I could get
2018 Jul 11
2
Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500,
2019 Mar 04
2
CentOs 7 i386 & PAE Kernel
Hi Gurus, I've been playing with CentOS 7's AltArch i386 builds with some good results on one machine, but can't get it to boot properly on another with a newer Bay Trail CPU. Previously CentOS 6 i386 worked on both, and that set a legacy I'd like to recreate... I *think* the problem is that the 7 kernel is non-PAE, and that has some peculiar knock on effect that prevents some
2017 Jan 18
3
PI3
Hi All, I downloaded: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/armhfp/ for the PI3 This article says the PI3 runs X. http://news.softpedia.com/news/centos-7-linux-officially-released-for-raspberry-pi-2-banana-pi-and-cubietruck-497891.shtml When I groupinstall Gnome desktop and reboot, then run startx I get an error about no screens found. Whats the trick to get X on the PI3? Thanks, Jerry
2018 Aug 06
2
Back to Xfce
On 08/06/2018 11:11 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 10:55 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> > wrote: > >> Nicolas, >> >> Thank you! But I am Dyslexic and very mono-linguistic; at least I could >> read the actual commands, if not all the wonderful comments... >> >> On 08/06/2018 10:26 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
2018 Aug 06
2
Back to Xfce
Now that the basic server is up and running.? With Gnome via VNC (yuck), it is time to go back and figure out howto install Xfce without an Xfce group script.? So I am asking those with X64 Centos for some pointers.? Like where are the group scripts so maybe I can modify them for armhfp. I was reading: https://www.rootusers.com/how-to-install-xfce-gui-in-centos-7-linux/ Where the author
2015 Sep 24
2
Logrotate problems
Actually, doing what logrotate suggests causes other problems. We don't have this problem on any other system so I am keen to understand the root of the issue rather than start messing around with the default permissions of the log directories. logrotate only matches /var/log/nginx/*log - /var/log/nginx/access.log & /var/log/nginx/error.log On the server where we have problems we have
2018 Aug 06
2
Back to Xfce
Nicolas, Thank you!? But I am Dyslexic and very mono-linguistic; at least I could read the actual commands, if not all the wonderful comments... On 08/06/2018 10:26 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 06/08/2018 ? 16:05, Robert Moskowitz a ?crit?: >> But notes that this installs Gnome (which I don't want) and that instead to >> >> yum groupinstall ?X Window System? >>