similar to: kvm/qemu and CPU load

Will the Bay Area LLVM Social take place on July 5 (first Thursday), or be rescheduled because adjacent to the July 4 holiday? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120625/6b8626ff/attachment.html>

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com>wrote: > Will the Bay Area LLVM Social take place on July 5 (first Thursday), or > be rescheduled because adjacent to the July 4 holiday? > FWIW, I'm fine rescheduling it, but let's see what the maestro says. > **** > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers

Thanks for pointing this out. Let's hold the July one on the 12th. On 25 June 2012 13:34, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com>wrote: > >> Will the Bay Area LLVM Social take place on July 5 (first Thursday), >> or be rescheduled because adjacent to the July 4 holiday?

Since commit 39e6c8208d7b ("net: solve a NAPI race") napi has been able to be rescheduled within napi_complete_done() even in non-busypoll case, but virtnet_poll() always enabled interrupts before complete, and when napi was rescheduled within napi_complete_done() it did not disable interrupts. This caused more interrupts when event idx is disabled. According to commit cbdadbbf0c79

Since commit 39e6c8208d7b ("net: solve a NAPI race") napi has been able to be rescheduled within napi_complete_done() even in non-busypoll case, but virtnet_poll() always enabled interrupts before complete, and when napi was rescheduled within napi_complete_done() it did not disable interrupts. This caused more interrupts when event idx is disabled. According to commit cbdadbbf0c79

On 2017?12?07? 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: >> Since commit 39e6c8208d7b ("net: solve a NAPI race") napi has been able >> to be rescheduled within napi_complete_done() even in non-busypoll case, >> but virtnet_poll() always enabled interrupts before complete, and when >> napi was rescheduled

On 2017?12?07? 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: >> Since commit 39e6c8208d7b ("net: solve a NAPI race") napi has been able >> to be rescheduled within napi_complete_done() even in non-busypoll case, >> but virtnet_poll() always enabled interrupts before complete, and when >> napi was rescheduled

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0987 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0987.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 8f5b6e393d90eaf271f3dc164c440e7e3b2440f2fd53e377ae5b83c8b8790e4e qemu-img-1.5.3-126.el7_3.6.x86_64.rpm

Hi, we are in the midst of an interesting work that begun with setting 'guessInstructionProperties = 0' in the SystemZ backend. We have found this to be useful, and discovered many instructions where the hasSideEffects flag was incorrectly set while it actually shouldn't. The attached patch and test case triggers an assert in TwoAddress.  (bin/llc ./tc_TwoAddr_crash.ll

In general, is it possible to run R scripts through cron jobs ? Is it possible to make the script detect the system interrupt, save its current status and then exit so that next time it is rescheduled it can pick up from where it left ? Examples, if any, are more then welcome. Thank you in advance, Maura tutti i telefonini TIM! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm mystified by a Windoze ``phenomenon'' which has just bitten me. I have a laptop which boots either Windoze or Linux; I (sad to say) need the Windoze OS for teaching purposes. I have R 1.9.1 installed on the laptop in the Windoze OS. Just now I decided to install, under the Windoze version of R, a library (``Misc'') of some local functions that I have collected over the

Greetings Earthlings: I finally convinced the LAN guy to remove NetBlooie from our windoze clients. I also made the samba box the local and master browser (we have no NT boxes at the moment). Local browsing seems to have gotten faster (at least Mr. Robinson's Network Neighborhood resolves faster). However, our LAN is isolated (windoze clients dial out to get to the internet, retrieve

Hi! I'd like to play with snes, arcade and other retro games, but unfortunatelly there isn't any linux emus for this. So I run the emutaltor callus with wine, with medius succes: Callus works fine, everything is ok, but it uses 100% CPU, and becouse of that, the soung goes wrongs somethimes. I don't know why it is takes so mutch work to wine... Callus emulate only 66 Mhz... The

Only because in my next passes I change the CFG significantly and it is very hard to maintain the values of the Phi nodes. Alexandra ________________________________ From: Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> To: Jimborean Alexandra <xinfinity_a at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>; "luismastrangelo at gmail.com"

hi ! my systems started to behave weird today. i am running a debian/linux-fileserver (woody/2.4.18) that exports the user-homes and acts as a PDC via samba (2.2.4 --with-ldapsam) to my windoze-clients (w2k/nt). i am using ldap as authentification database. everything worked like a charme, until today. suddenly some users cannot authenticate against the windoze-machines any more. other users

On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > Hello, > > Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers > precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points > points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? Hi Max, I don't know the answer offhand but please keep in mind that the current andersen's pass has many

When the world was young, Sandie carved some runes like this: > Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:23:24 -0600 > From: shui@yxepna01.pointsnorth.com > To: samba@anu.edu.au > Subject: Newbie to Samba [snip] > 1. Samba keeps it own set of password in private/smbpasswd after Samba > was installed. What's the use of those passwords? Are they being used to > perform validation if

On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote: > Locking is always an issue in a virtualized environment as the virtual > CPU that is waiting on a lock may get scheduled out and hence block > any progress in lock acquisition even when the lock has been freed. > > One solution to this problem is to allow unfair lock in a > para-virtualized environment. In this case, a new lock acquirer

On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote: > Locking is always an issue in a virtualized environment as the virtual > CPU that is waiting on a lock may get scheduled out and hence block > any progress in lock acquisition even when the lock has been freed. > > One solution to this problem is to allow unfair lock in a > para-virtualized environment. In this case, a new lock acquirer

> We should also think about how to call std::terminate when cleanup dtors throw. The current representation for Itanium is inefficient. As a strawman, I propose making @__clang_call_terminate an intrinsic: … That sounds like a good starting point. > Chandler expressed strong concerns about this design, however, as @llvm.eh.get_capture_block adds an ordering constraint on CodeGen. Once