similar to: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 148, Issue 2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 148, Issue 2"

2017 Jun 05
0
CEEA-2017:1388 CentOS 7 kmod-redhat-i40evf Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:1388 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-1388.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: b28b4ff3b0afadb7c7b0f42ec738f7b9c71ad53cac2450a2358c0ad4ae5ac848 kmod-redhat-i40evf-1.6.27_k_dup7.3-1.el7_3.x86_64.rpm Source:
2017 Jun 05
0
CEEA-2017:1388 CentOS 7 kmod-redhat-i40e Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:1388 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-1388.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: fc4079f76e3fb6e8d1fce4f0320b7d426d31d97abe170e0cd8c271e6b03ffc9b kmod-redhat-i40e-1.6.27_k_dup7.3-1.el7_3.x86_64.rpm Source:
2016 Sep 20
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 139, Issue 5
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2016 Jul 12
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 137, Issue 4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2018 Mar 27
0
CEEA-2018:0579 CentOS 7 kmod-redhat-i40e Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2018:0579 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:0579 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 973726f539d915e4d6667bcd4a551f08403e56307c00ed85032ac916e5414982 kmod-redhat-i40e-2.1.14_k_dup7.4-2.1.el7_4.x86_64.rpm
2018 Mar 28
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 157, Issue 7
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2016 Jul 11
0
CEEA-2016:1394 CentOS 7 i40evf Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:1394 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1394.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 2a1c1b67665db54057507583ecdf00b98a14ffe148d8306e18522bf654d258cf kmod-i40evf-1.5.10_k-1.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source:
2016 Sep 19
0
CEEA-2016:1902 CentOS 7 i40evf Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:1902 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1902.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: b0c104d05e884a57fd198f40c4c9bdc517e85576bbaed56f5c69d9a802158fd2 kmod-i40evf-1.5.10_k-2.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source:
2017 Dec 19
2
[RFC PATCH] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
On 12/19/2017 11:46 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:42:33 -0800 > "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > >> On 12/19/2017 10:41 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:21:17 -0500 (EST) >>> David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Stephen
2017 Dec 19
2
[RFC PATCH] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
On 12/19/2017 11:46 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:42:33 -0800 > "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > >> On 12/19/2017 10:41 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:21:17 -0500 (EST) >>> David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Stephen
2017 Dec 19
0
[RFC PATCH] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:37:50 -0800 "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > On 12/19/2017 11:46 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:42:33 -0800 > > "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > > > >> On 12/19/2017 10:41 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >>> On
2023 Mar 21
1
Xen with libvirt and SR-IOV
Hi everybody, since long time, I'm using Xen on CentOS with XL, currently latest CentOS 7 with Xen 4.15 from the CentOS-Xen-Project. For several VMs I have to use SR-IOV, to lower the CPU-usage on Dom0 on the host. CentOS 7 comes to an end, Xen is not supported by RHEL nor RockyLinux anymore, so unfortunately I have to switch to KVM. First step will be now, converting all the scripts for
2014 May 08
0
[PATCH] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
I think that it may be appropriate to submit this patch for linux-next instead of 3.15-rc4... On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. > This does that. > > Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. > > Suggested-by: Dave
2014 May 11
0
[PATCH] [resend] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
SET_ETHTOOL_OPS is equivalent to : #define SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(netdev,ops) \ ( (netdev)->ethtool_ops = (ops) ) how it makes difference removing this code and replacing with the code mentioned ? On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS > > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see
2014 May 11
0
[PATCH] [resend] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
SET_ETHTOOL_OPS is equivalent to : #define SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(netdev,ops) \ ( (netdev)->ethtool_ops = (ops) ) how it makes difference removing this code and replacing with the code mentioned ? On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS > > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see
2014 May 08
2
[PATCH] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. This does that. Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. Suggested-by: Dave Miller <davem at davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> --- Applies against v3.15-rc4. diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ethtool.c
2014 May 08
2
[PATCH] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. This does that. Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. Suggested-by: Dave Miller <davem at davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> --- Applies against v3.15-rc4. diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ethtool.c
2014 May 11
7
[PATCH] [resend] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. This does that. Mostly done via coccinelle script: @@ struct ethtool_ops *ops; struct net_device *dev; @@ - SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(dev, ops); + dev->ethtool_ops = ops; Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. Suggested-by: Dave Miller <davem at
2014 May 11
7
[PATCH] [resend] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. This does that. Mostly done via coccinelle script: @@ struct ethtool_ops *ops; struct net_device *dev; @@ - SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(dev, ops); + dev->ethtool_ops = ops; Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. Suggested-by: Dave Miller <davem at
2014 May 11
7
[PATCH] [resend] net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS
net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. This does that. Mostly done via coccinelle script: @@ struct ethtool_ops *ops; struct net_device *dev; @@ - SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(dev, ops); + dev->ethtool_ops = ops; Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. Suggested-by: Dave Miller <davem at