similar to: CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID

John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/31/2017 8:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the RAID >> has 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I started shred >> /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still running. Is this >> reasonable for it to be taking this long...? > > not at all

On 5/31/2017 8:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the RAID has > 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I started shred > /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still running. Is this > reasonable for it to be taking this long...? not at all surprising, as that raid sounds like its built with

John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/31/2017 10:13 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> If I had realized it would run this long, I would have used DBAN.... For >> single drives, I do, and choose DoD 5220.22-M (seven passes), which is >> *way* overkill these days... but I sign my name to a certificate that >> gets stuck on the outside of the server, meaning I, personally, am

On Wed, 31 May 2017, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the > RAID has 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I > started shred /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still > running. Is this reasonable for it to be taking this long...? Unless you specified non-default options, shred overwrites each

On 5/31/2017 10:13 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > If I had realized it would run this long, I would have used DBAN.... For > single drives, I do, and choose DoD 5220.22-M (seven passes), which is > *way* overkill these days... but I sign my name to a certificate that gets > stuck on the outside of the server, meaning I, personally, am responsible > for the sanitization of the

On 05/31/2017 08:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the RAID has > 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I started shred > /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still running. Is this > reasonable for it to be taking this long...? Was the system booting from /dev/sda, or were you running any

Hi, I have a wishlist item. Is there an appropriate place for me to post it? Basically, I would like to know that my email isn't recoverable from the local disk on the mail server after I delete it. So instead of just deleting the file from my Maildir, I'd like the option to exist for Dovecot to shred it.. Ie, overwrite the file with random data and/or null bytes before deletion. In the

On 5/31/2017 12:46 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Not dealing with "secret", dealing with HIPAA and PII data. And*sigh* > Homeland Security Theater dictates.... We run all used disks through a shredder before surplusing any systems, and we are just a manufacturing company dealing with internal corporate IT stuff. the shredder is a truck from a 'data destruction'

On 31/05/17 21:23, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/31/2017 12:46 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Not dealing with "secret", dealing with HIPAA and PII data. And*sigh* >> Homeland Security Theater dictates.... > > We run all used disks through a shredder before surplusing any systems, > and we are just a manufacturing company dealing with internal corporate > IT

CentOS-5.7 using fuse-ntfs-3g I have a HDD from a laptop that is being returned for repair replacement. I wish to remove certain files before sending the laptop back with the HDD. I have mouunted the HDD on my desktop as an ntfs filesystem using an external SATA / USB adapter. As root I then used the gnome desktop to move the desired files to trash. Now I wish to delete the contents of the

Hi, if we were to use shred to delete a file on a gluster volume, will the correct blocks be overwritten on the bricks? (still using Gluster 3.6.3 as have been too cautious to upgrade a mission critical live system). Cheers, Kingsley.

Hello, On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:01:56 -0400 m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > > Good evening from Singapore! > > > > The foremost question which I want to ask is, what is the universal > > (world wide) understanding behind degaussing hard drives? > > > > I work for No Secrets Agency (NSA) Pte Ltd (fictitious company name

Good evening from Singapore! The foremost question which I want to ask is, what is the universal (world wide) understanding behind degaussing hard drives? I work for No Secrets Agency (NSA) Pte Ltd (fictitious company name used). My sales manager Edward Joseph Snowden (fictitious individual name used) had *promised* our customer Leave Me in the Lurch (S) Pte Ltd (fictitious company name used)

On 11/08/2017 11:36 PM, Kingsley Tart wrote: > Hi, > > if we were to use shred to delete a file on a gluster volume, will the > correct blocks be overwritten on the bricks? > > (still using Gluster 3.6.3 as have been too cautious to upgrade a > mission critical live system). When I strace `shred filename`, it just seems to write + fsync random values into the file based on

Anyone have any clues about how to sanitize a dead SSD? We haven't had it yet, but we're sure it's coming. Esp. since I'm a federal contractor, a dead disk gets deGaussed, but what the hell do you do with a SSD?

R help, How can I plot the below data table by Data ~ Site and group by Grinder and Equip Id so I get a chart like this Excel version? I have tried coplot with little success and lattice makes a pretty good chart like I want, but I am using the DCOM so it does not display correctly. I would like to make this using the base library if possible. <<...OLE_Obj...>> DATA TABLE

Greetings all, I am curious if anyone knows why utilities such as 'GNU shred' (part of coreutils) and 'wipe' say they are not effective on journalled file systems- especially EXT3. Is it because you can't "guarantee" that the journal has been flushed/wiped (i.e. you have the journal 'between' you and the actual data blocks on the physical disk), or because

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 05:29:13PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 02/04/18 15:09, wwp wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:01:56 -0400 m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > > >> Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > >>> Good evening from Singapore! > >>> > >>> The foremost question which I want to ask

DBAN is obsolete. NIST 800-88 for some time now says to use secure erase or enhanced security erase or crypto erase if supported. Other options do not erase data in remapped sectors. Chris Murphy

On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > SSD disks must be shredded as the data has been written over multiple > sectors many times to 'even the writes'. This allows for even a 'dead' > disk to be disassembled with 'off-the-shelf' equipment to extract > items from the dead places. Depending on the data involved, there may > be