similar to: Supersize io operations (IO block size more than 4KiB) is split in to number of 4KiB blocks

Concern: Supersize io operations (IO block size more than 4KiB) is split in to number of 4KiB blocks Supersize io operations (IO block size more than 4KiB) is split in to number of 4KiB blocks OS: CentOS 7.3 kernel Version: 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 Any IO (write) block size more than 4KiB is split in to number of 4KiB blocks on Centos 7.3 ( where I don't see similar issue on 7.2). I have a

John Rosatti, Excavators, 3D, NASA and Why Should I care? Well, because! There are two definitions for excavator; one is any person engaging in excavation is called an excavator. The second definition of excavator is, of course, the vehicles called excavators, which are sometimes called diggers, trackhoes, fronthoes, and 360-degree excavators or just 360. This is not to be confused with

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >>> Most such vulns are against Apache, PHP, etc, which do not run as root. >> >> Those are common. Combine them with anything called a 'local >> privilege escalation' vulnerability and you've got a remote root >> exploit. > > Not quite. An LPE can only be used

> On Feb 4, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> An LPE can only be used against your system by logged-in users. > > Or any running program - like a web server. That?s not what LPE means. ?L? = ?local?, meaning you are logged-in interactively

Hy Timo ! I Made some modification in stream_read in zlib. I remove all zlib part, because i don't need this, but i need to read a istream to change it. Well, i create a size_t called supersize, with is a substitute for stream->zs.avail_in. The trouble is, my debug file have a lot of "READ Plugin\n", and i think it's because my read becomes a loop, i think it's because

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0156 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0156.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: b26004db2b4479e8229913b2783139cf kmod-lpfc-PAE-rhel5u4-8.2.0.63.1p-1.4.el5_4.i686.rpm 6c7c0ab2ea8f812f6ec0c26a746a04a5

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0156 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0156.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 787036f097504e710495f522bfe48661 kmod-lpfc-rhel5u4-8.2.0.63.1p-1.4.el5_4.x86_64.rpm 11899040b4af01ec087e0fa82d580c87

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

> On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>>> >> Most such vulns are against Apache, PHP, etc, which do not run as root. > > Those are common. Combine them with anything called a 'local > privilege escalation' vulnerability

Good morning, we have 2 Redhat Enterprise 5.7 machines, they are a cluster with some mail services in it (postfix and dovecot 2). The version of dovecot is dovecot-2.0.1-1_118.el5 (installed via rpm). >From last week we have this dovecot problem: suddenly dovecot doesn't accept any new connections, the dovecot.log file reports lines like these Mar 15 12:38:54 secchia dovecot: imap:

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1760 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1760.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 34076a399db40f55bd0d2b86619e9799eab69d3d9e7662773914af9c2166b518 kmod-lpfc-10.2.8021.0-1.el7_0.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:1975 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1975.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 5496783be83e9686b32017d2cbe2deb59bd8f35917adf89c101f51aaa051b24b kmod-lpfc-11.1.0.2-1.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0389 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0389 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 9c633b01f1493d863026cd57f41094520d215aa420429701f4a4f3aafb949832 kmod-redhat-lpfc-12.0.0.5_dup7.6-1.el7_6.x86_64.rpm Source:

dev_<level> create smaller objects than dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL>. Convert non-debug calls to this form. Joe Perches (16): tile: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to dev_<level>( ata: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to dev_<level>( drivers: base: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to dev_<level>( block: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to

dev_<level> create smaller objects than dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL>. Convert non-debug calls to this form. Joe Perches (16): tile: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to dev_<level>( ata: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to dev_<level>( drivers: base: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to dev_<level>( block: Convert dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to

Dear All, The production server supports Intel Virtualization Technology. Processor is an Intel Xeon 1.86 GHz Quad Core. 8 GB DDR2 memory. There is also an Emulex LightPulse Fiber Channel HBA adapter. The host operating system (Dom 0) is RHEL 5 x86 with Xen Virtualization technology. Dom 0 kernel is 2.6.18-8.el5xen. I have recompiled the Dom 0 kernel so that pciback

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting > early acks. > > clang has a number of useful, new

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by