similar to: RHEL 6.9 is out

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 03/28/2017 06:54 PM, Richard wrote: > > > > > >>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> OK guys, the CR release has happened. > >>> > >> Date: Tuesday,

On 03/28/2017 06:54 PM, Richard wrote: > > >>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> OK guys, the CR release has happened. >>> >> Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 16:23:32 -0700 >> From: Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> >> >> Still only 6.8 on the

On 22/03/17 05:31 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/22/2017 08:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>> Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. >>>> >>>> Why isn't

On 03/22/2017 05:11 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 22/03/17 05:31 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 03/22/2017 08:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>>> Red Hat released

On 04/06/2017 11:32 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > Hi, > > Is the centos-release srpm available anywhere? I do not see any srpms in > vault. > > Regards, > Sorry .. all the SRPMs except centos-release and anaconda are in 6.8/cr/ in vault. Let me do anaconda and centos-release now and then I'll hardlink the others into 6.9/os along with those. Should be out in about an

On 05/02/2017 09:59 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 05/01/2017 06:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On May 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? >>>> >>>> Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info????

On 05/01/2017 06:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On May 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> wrote: >> What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? >> >> Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info???? > > I can?t find any packages called 'internet-browser? for CentOS6 or 7, in either the base repos or EPEL.

On 05/16/2016 04:02 PM, Wes James wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> The Continuous Release repository RPMs for CentOS-6.8 are now released. >> It includes the following releases: >> >> > This is the first time I've installed updates from CR. I did this on 6.7 > in virtualbox. When I reboot,

Hi, Is the centos-release srpm available anywhere? I do not see any srpms in vault. Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me123 at tdiehl.org

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the > > message of 06/02-- > > > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html > > > > Nor have I seen any additional information. So how

inline... On 4/21/22 09:29, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 4/20/22 16:16, Kay Schenk wrote: >> Hi Joshua, and list... >> >> I got the non-workng sound driver for Intel HDA fixed with my kernel >> 4.18.0-373. >> >> After removing the extra kernel flag i915_alpha from my command line >> >> (see instructions when this module really was alpha -- >>

On 10/07/2015 01:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/07/2015 11:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> >>> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the >>>> message of 06/02-- >>>>

>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:53:05 -0700, >> Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> said: K> Does anyone know where I can find GnuPG 2.0.16 for CentOS 6.9 32-bit? Do you want something that old? 2.0.17 came out in 2011. I run Oracle Linux 6.9 (basically RHEL without the trademarks) -- if you're comfortable building from source, GnuPG-2.2.5 wasn't hard. This is

On 11/19/2018 01:38 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 18/11/2018 ? 15:14, Yan Li a ?crit?: >> The recommended method for undo an update is >> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/64069, but it's not supported if glibc, >> kernel, or selinux are changed. I'd give it a try if the system is not >> critical. Make backups first. >> >> Some other people's

On 07/05/2018 06:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/04/2018 06:35 PM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 16:06 -0400, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Where can I find the srpm for >>>> centos-release-6-10.el6.centos.12.3.x86_64? >>>>

On 08/25/2016 10:44 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >> smoketest environments -- match the production environment > > > I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: > > http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html Great resource!

Totally and completely on my HP microfiber. Wouldn't get past anything to even get me into the grub menu. NOT AMUSED! _______________________ Kay Schenk

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 12:31 Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 3:15 PM Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello all-- > > I'm in a bind trying to reset an older Nether DSL modem. I did a manual > > reset on it. It was set up as "pass thru" by me and I want to "undo" > that.

On Aug 24, 2016 5:05 PM, "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm >> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. > > > Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I think John's question

On 08/24/2016 07:53 PM, Peter wrote: > On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote: >> To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any >> version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been >> using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I >> need to be able to test and use the builds. We'll be