Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "firewalld management on a headless server"
2017 Mar 28
0
firewalld management on a headless server
On Mon, March 27, 2017 17:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Mike wrote:
>> Nice catch, Mr. Schumacher ---> The following modules are included
>> as
>> standard with release 1.831 of Webmin. FirewallD firewalld.wbm.gz
>> Configure a Linux firewall using FirewallD, by editing allowed
>> services and ports.
>>
>> This is likely the right tool for the
2017 Mar 27
1
firewalld management on a headless server
Mike wrote:
> Nice catch, Mr. Schumacher ---> The following modules are included as
> standard with release 1.831 of Webmin. FirewallD firewalld.wbm.gz
> Configure a Linux firewall using FirewallD, by editing allowed
> services and ports.
>
> This is likely the right tool for the job.
>
Webmin used to be considered insecure, and people would scream and yell if
you
2017 Mar 27
0
firewalld management on a headless server
Nice catch, Mr. Schumacher ---> The following modules are included as
standard with release 1.831 of Webmin. FirewallD firewalld.wbm.gz
Configure a Linux firewall using FirewallD, by editing allowed
services and ports.
This is likely the right tool for the job.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Michael Schumacher
<michael.schumacher at pamas.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I recently
2017 Mar 27
5
firewalld management on a headless server
Hi,
> I recently converted my employer's firewall from pure iptabes to
> firewalld and looked for something similar, more along the lines of
> webmin, etc.
funny,
my webmin installation on a banana-pi has webmin 1.831, which has
support for firewalld.
I am not sure, but I believe I got it directly from www.webmin.com.
best regards
---
Michael Schumacher
2017 Mar 28
0
firewalld management on a headless server
Webmin used to be considered insecure, and people would scream and yell if
you suggested using it. Has that changed?
mark
Ahh, I did not know of this.
Well, I'm back to suggesting OP take a little time and get comfortable with
firewall-cmd in the terminal. If we want our solid redhat clone then
systemd, NetworkManager, and firewalld are soldered into the foreseeable
future.
2017 Mar 27
5
firewalld management on a headless server
Is there an Apache tool to manage firewalld on a headless server?
I am looking forward to my next Centos project which is to replace my
Juniper SSG5 firewall...
And along that line, what overlap, if any between firewalld and Suricata?
thank you
2017 Mar 27
0
firewalld management on a headless server
I recently converted my employer's firewall from pure iptabes to
firewalld and looked for something similar, more along the lines of
webmin, etc.
I didn't find anything close to a match.
In the end, it all came down to getting comfortable with
"firewall-cmd" in the shell.
Haven't used suricata, so nothing to add there.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Robert Moskowitz
2017 Mar 27
0
firewalld management on a headless server
I don't think it's going to give you a web-based firewall configuration tool.
It does allow you to control/configure networking hardware and devices
via NetworkManager, but I don't believe it goes further than that for
networking.
Ironically, it does provide a an ssh-like session terminal where you
can get directly logged in and use firewall-cmd. :-)
2017 Mar 27
2
firewalld management on a headless server
On 03/27/2017 03:24 PM, Mike wrote:
> I recently converted my employer's firewall from pure iptabes to
> firewalld and looked for something similar, more along the lines of
> webmin, etc.
> I didn't find anything close to a match.
> In the end, it all came down to getting comfortable with
> "firewall-cmd" in the shell.
I have been digging and found that Fedora
2017 Mar 30
0
firewalld management on a headless server
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>On 03/29/2017 07:38 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>>We have good results with http://www.shorewall.net/ an iptables
>>"abstraction".
>>Despite its not a GUI, the streamlined configuration helps to be effective.
>
>From what I can determine, it is still iptables. Not firewalld.
That's what Leon said, shorewall is an
2017 Mar 27
3
firewalld management on a headless server
On Mon, March 27, 2017 3:58 pm, Mike wrote:
> I don't think it's going to give you a web-based firewall configuration
> tool.
Firewall/router system I use is pfSense:
https://pfsense.org/
It has nice web interface for configuration of everything, based on
FreeBSD (very slim, lightweight, small footprint). Has a lot what you may
want to have in router box, including VPN,... If OP
2017 Mar 29
2
firewalld management on a headless server
On 03/29/2017 07:38 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 27.03.2017 um 21:03 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>:
>> Is there an Apache tool to manage firewalld on a headless server?
>>
>> I am looking forward to my next Centos project which is to replace my Juniper SSG5 firewall...
>>
>> And along that line, what overlap, if any between firewalld and
2017 Mar 29
0
firewalld management on a headless server
Am 27.03.2017 um 21:03 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>:
>
> Is there an Apache tool to manage firewalld on a headless server?
>
> I am looking forward to my next Centos project which is to replace my Juniper SSG5 firewall...
>
> And along that line, what overlap, if any between firewalld and Suricata?
We have good results with
2017 Mar 28
0
firewalld management on a headless server
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri
> Galtsev
> Sent: den 27 mars 2017 23:43
> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld management on a headless server
>
>
> On Mon, March 27, 2017 3:58 pm, Mike wrote:
> > I don't think it's going to give you a
2017 Mar 28
1
firewalld management on a headless server
On 3/27/2017 10:20 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> That reminded me about Smoothwall I used to use a few years back.
> Wasn't pfsense related to Smoothwall, maybe even a fork?
smoothwall is linux based.
m0n0wall was a BSD firewall that pfSense forked from back in 2004.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
2003 Mar 22
0
Where did the files go?
Hi All,
I am a newb to Rsync and I have a question. I am trying to back up our
main server to a remote server. I have rsyncd.conf on the remote
computer. I ran this command from the remote computer and it looked
great the whole 2 seconds it took to run....it said it completed but
now....I cant find any of the files on the remote server.
Here is my rsyncd.conf
#Global Options
#
motd file =
2014 Apr 01
1
Webmin Module
Being a noob having something like webmin would be pretty cool swat has sort been swatted.
In the many heads webmin would have a bigger reach than swat.
So anyway been having a go.
Apols but haven't done any hacking / dev for of 15 years! Also a complete noob to perl and doing it the video recorder way.
Manuals Paaa!
2003 Jun 25
0
Webmin module
Hi
on the download site for asterisk, there is one directory called webmin
and I presume that this contains a webmin module for Asterisk, yet this
doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere.
Is this unfinished work in progress? typically webmin modules are in
form of .wbm packages that can be installed using webmin itself, but I
couldn't find any such module in the webmin directory nor
2014 Sep 09
1
CentOS 7: firewalld.service operation time out - systemctl firewalld issues
I'm having a few issues with firewalld on a CentOS 7 install, in
particular when using systemctl to start/check the status of the
daemon:
Checking the firewalld daemon status
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
# systemctl status firewalld
firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled)
Active: failed
2018 Feb 13
0
firewalld services to open for an ADDC
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:30 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hai,
>
> If you use that or the AD, then its incomplete, imo.
> Your missing ldaps (636) and the GC (ssl) 3268/3269) ports and maybe NTP (123/tcp) if installed.
> Maybe you dont need them, just an observation.
>
Oh I see I need to look at the ports in the chart not just the ones