similar to: RHEL 6.9 is out

I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting CentOS 8 out! But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. Is something broken? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical

This is not your usual "so when is CO 7.8.xxxx coming out?" posts. I'm just curious if the CentOS team is affected by our current world conditions, or is work-from-home modus operandi for the team? (In other words, "when is CO 7.8.xxxx coming out?") -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian

Forgive me if this has been answered before and I've missed it. This https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511 says live kernel patches will be available via yum updates as of RHEL 7.7. Is this carried over to CentOS 7.7.1908? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory) Center for

We do have the elrepo drivers installed. Maybe part of the problem is also that we're using an IOgear KVM switch? On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Felipe Westfields < > felipe.westfields at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm having issues with a quad video card on CentOS. > >

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 08:18, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:33 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > > wrote: > > >> > >

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks > using ptrace. > > There is a mitigation described here > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344#c13 > > which doesn't fix the

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net > wrote: > > > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> > > > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > > > I can't get it to

FWIW, we don't use a separate partition and haven't had any issues (we do set up / as a separate partition only 5GB large). We have over 150 systems that have been chugging along with many versions of CentOS this way for years. We only use ext3,4 filesystems though. And no volume manager. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:42 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote:

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/04/2016 04:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released: > > <snip> > > 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! > > And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3 > Sources. The main tree will be labeled '7.3.1611' on

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. > > > > Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) > > > Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sure. Thanks, guys for the great work > you are doing! > > Or you as

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:04 AM Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > There was a recent thread about Redhat's removal of drivers from LSI > SAS2, it's probably the problem you are facing. > It can be worked around with the help of Elrepo repo. > > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2019-October/173682.html > > >

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Johnny, > > > > Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 > > > > cheers > > > > > > bump > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

Any word on this update for CentOS 6? This one seems pretty bad if it's a remote exploit. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Red Hat Errata Notifications <errata at redhat.com> Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:19 PM

On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 10/3/19 1:32 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>> Forgive me if this has been answered before and

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > On 10/3/19 1:32 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Forgive me if this has been answered before and I've missed it. > > > > This https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511 says live kernel > patches > > will be available via yum updates as of RHEL 7.7. Is this carried over to

> Am 08.12.2020 um 15:32 schrieb Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > > This is really, really bad for the majority of us using CentOS. > Of course it is. > Is there any way we can lobby for the reversal of this decision? Remember > that the -devel mailing list, and IRC channels *do not* represent the vast > majority of CentOS users. Most of us are just

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: > >> > >>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! > > > > > > And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3 > > >