similar to: CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017, 7:41 AM James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > On Fri, March 10, 2017 11:57, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > > > > Looks like only one sector's bad. Running badblocks should, > > I think, mark that sector as bad, so the system doesn't try > > to read or write there. I've got a user whose workstation has > > had

On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might >> be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a >> /forcefsck file was created on the host system, and the host system >> remotely restarted. > > fsck's not good at finding

We have a remote warm standby system running CentOS-6.8 as a KVM system with multiple guests. One of the guests began reporting an error when running aide. Caught SIGBUS/SEGV while mmapping. File was truncated while aide was running? Caught SIGBUS/SEGV. Exiting The /var/log/messages file contained this: Mar 9 09:14:13 inet12 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 14539264 Mar 9

On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: > On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> >> On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >>> >>> fsck's not good at finding disk errors, it finds filesystem errors. >> >> If not fsck then what? > > badblocks(8). And I definitely will

I get up around 0630, u can come anytime after that. I want to hit the range that morning but if I KNEW when you are arriving, I could plan around that... > On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: >>> On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at

Dear all, I'm trying to find a way to automate checkdisk every 1 month on a weekend. in other words i want checkdisk to run every saturday morning. i can of course change the default mount/count though that wont let me control WHEN it will happen. so i need your expert opinion with the following if possible: 1. reboot into single user mode 2. start checkdisk for all disks 3. once done,

On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: >> On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >>>> >>>> fsck's not good at finding disk

On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > > On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >> >> fsck's not good at finding disk errors, it finds filesystem errors. > > If not fsck then what? badblocks(8).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Howdy - we have a bunch of dual processor Compaqs with 180GB RAID partitions for email, running with ext2 for the last year or so. I thought I'd try out ext3 (on our development machine :-) to see whether it was a practical proposition for this kind of thing yet. Appears to be working so far, with a

This morning I discovered this in the logwatch report for our external MX backup host. STARTTLS: write error=syscall error (-1), errno=32, get_error=error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0), retry=99, ssl_err=5: 206 Time(s) I also see many entries similar to this: 8: fl=0x802, mode=140777: SOCK inet04.mississauga.harte-lyne.ca/34091->(Transport endpoint is not connected): 1 Time(s)

If I have the 6th column in fstab (the pass column) set to 0, does that mean disk checks will never be forced at boot regardless of anything like File System State, Mount Count, and Check Interval on the file system itself, or are there exceptions to this? I know `man fstab` says: If the sixth field is not present or zero, a value of zero is returned and fsck will assume that the filesystem does

Am 25.11.2014 um 21:39 schrieb James B. Byrne: > This morning I discovered this in the logwatch report for our external MX > backup host. > > > STARTTLS: write error=syscall error (-1), errno=32, > get_error=error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0), retry=99, ssl_err=5: 206 > Time(s) > > > > I also see many entries similar to this: > > > > 8:

About two weeks ago i was whining about an inode that got lost, now i'm going to whine more about strange things happening here. A matroxfb just oopsed on me (thats not strange), the machine got unusuable, so i logged in from another and got the idea to touch /forcefsck. Upon reboot, fsck said that some inodes are in use but have dtime set and that some files are illegal sockets. Now this

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure what's going on with your drive. But if it were mine, I'd want > to replace it. If there are issues, that long smart check ought to turn up > something, and in my experience, that's enough for a manufacturer to do a > warranty replacement. I agree with Matt. Go

On 08/11/2017 12:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Robert Nichols > <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: >> On 08/10/2017 11:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 6:48 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On

We have a very old Dell desk top machine that has been running CentOS 6 for the past five years.? It received a new, 1 TB disk and additional memory before the OS installation.? It has been the primary Linux machine in our smallest and most remote field office.? It has been updated at least once a week and has all current dates installed. Boot-up this morning lasted about six times as long as

I appear to have a broken filesystem on this box to the point where I am probably going to rebuild the system since I have lost trust in it.... I was wondering if there was any reasonable postmortum work I could do on it before it gets rebuilt. History is that the laptop has a much mauled partition set on it - initially it came with 100% win2k, I then shrunk that and added linux (a RH71 install

I have a CentOS-6.8 system which has a suspected HHD failure. I have booted it into rescue mode from a CentOS-6.5 minimal install CD in order to run fsck -c on it. The system hosts several vms. I have activated the lvs associated with these vm using pvscan -s ; vgscan ; vgchange -ay. An lvscan shows the lvs as ACTIVE. None are mounted. When I try to run fsck on any of them I see the

Hello, Yesterday evening this box crashed and, for once, ext3 was not able to recover automatically. There was an "unexpected inconsistency inode xxxxx has imagic flag set" error and the system would not boot. I fscked from my rescue disk and I guess 20 or 30 errors were fixed by me just selecting "y" at the prompt. The system then booted and, so far as I can tell, the only

Hi, I have some errors in dmesg: [ 542.255788] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0xffffff SErr 0x0 action 0x0 [ 542.255797] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 [ 542.255805] ata1.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED [ 542.255821] ata1.00: cmd 60/00:00:1a:b7:7a/04:00:1d:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 524288 in [ 542.255824] res 41/40:00:a0:b7:7a/00:00:1d:00:00/40 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> [