similar to: base64 response for websockets

I finally found it. echo -n ${key}258EAFA5-E914-47DA-95CA-C5AB0DC85B11|openssl dgst -sha1 -binary|base64 Thanks, Jerry

On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 23:10 +0200, gizmo via samba wrote: > Ok, I understood, I should join with a new name. > But what's the difference between my plans and the docu "Rejoining the upgraded DC" ? > There is nothing mentioned, that a new name is necessary. > Is it because I install a new OS and so I start from scratch ? A new name is not necessary, which is why this

Hallo, we have 5 ADDCs. All of them did run with sernet-samba 4.6.7. I updated 4 of them to sernet-samba 4.7.0, one after the other, checked replication, everything seemed to be ok. One day later a colleague wanted to delete a lot of users with a powershell-script and since then the replication doesnt work anymore. (Im sure the script is not the problem, but it seemes like it triggered something)

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:59:47 +1300 Garming Sam via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Can you provide a bit more logs? At first glance, it doesn't seem > quite related to group memberships. > > > Cheers, > > Garming > > On 29/09/17 22:07, gizmo via samba wrote: > > Hallo, > > we have 5 ADDCs. All of them did run with sernet-samba 4.6.7.

I have heard alot about Node.js and watched a few tutorials and read some stuff. I get the impression that in certain situations AJAX calls with node.js is alot faster than with rails. I also have somewhat of an impression that with Rails web sockets are complicated to implement but with node.js web sockets might be alot easier. I am trying to figure out if I should learn some node.js or

I''m thinking of starting on a Ruby website that uses WebSockets, and perhaps working some on a server for it beforehand. Is good support for asynchronous connections something I could work on adding to the Rails core? Is it feasible? Desired? As I understand it, Rails plugins like Juggernaut [1] aren''t going to optimally support async, since they can''t re-architecture

[adding nbdkit readers] On 10/13/18 1:39 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote: > Hello all, > > It might be neat to attach ISOs to KVM guests via websockets. Basically > the browser would be the NBD "server" and an NBD client would run on the > hypervisor, then use `virsh change-media vm1 hdc --insert /dev/nbd0` could > use an ISO from my desk to boot from. Are you using qemu as

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:58:06AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 5/29/20 8:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > >>>(2) You need to persuade qemu's NBD client to read from a WebSocket. > >>>I didn't really know anything about WebSockets until today but it > >>>seems as if they are a full-duplex protocol layered on top of HTTP [a]. >

Going back to the original email from 2018: > It might be neat to attach ISOs to KVM guests via websockets.  Basically > the  browser would be the NBD "server" and an NBD client would run on the > hypervisor, then use `virsh change-media vm1 hdc --insert /dev/nbd0` could > use an ISO from my desk to boot from. > > Here's an HTML5 open file example: >

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 07:50:14AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > [adding qemu list] > > On 5/29/20 4:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Going back to the original email from 2018: > > > > > It might be neat to attach ISOs to KVM guests via websockets.  Basically > > > the  browser would be the NBD "server" and an NBD client would run on the

Hi everyone, I'm currently trying to play a little with WebRTC using sipml5 client and Asterisk trunk (370821) It seems the the WebRTC implementation for Asterisk 11 is already available in the trunk? Am I right? http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2012-July/055940.html I'm having trouble to even register to my Asterisk server using sipml5 client. The only reference to

Hi all, I can't find a working archive search for this list, so please forgive me if this has been discussed before. Has any thought been given to supporting websockets in the ssh client? I'm talking about solely using a websocket as the transport layer, and leaving the actual protocol intact, as opposed to the (to me, frankly terrifying) idea of allowing a web server to act as an ssh

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:08:29PM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > On Fri, 29 May 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:58:06AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > > On 5/29/20 8:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > > >>>(2) You need to persuade qemu's NBD client to read from a WebSocket. > > > >>>I

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:24:22AM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 9:45 PM Eric Wheeler <nbd@lists.ewheeler.net> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > It might be neat to attach ISOs to KVM guests via websockets.  Basically > > the  browser would be the NBD "server" and an

Does Rails have anything that supports real-time events and communication with WebSockets and gracefully fallbacks to other techniques if WebSockets are not supported? I would like the possibility to pub/sub events and messages for live chats and real time notifications. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To

Hi list, I have no idea if Damien Miller had the time to work on that. I have an initial patch to authenticate using PKCS#11 and ECDSA keys. This requires OpenSSL 1.0.2, prior OpenSSL versions do not expose the required interfaces to override the signature function pointer for ECDSA. The only limitation is that the OpenSSL API misses some cleanup function (finish, for instance), hence I have yet

On 5/29/20 8:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> (2) You need to persuade qemu's NBD client to read from a WebSocket. >>> I didn't really know anything about WebSockets until today but it >>> seems as if they are a full-duplex protocol layered on top of HTTP [a]. >>> Is there a WebSocket proxy that turns WS into plain TCP (a bit like >>>

[adding qemu list] On 5/29/20 4:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Going back to the original email from 2018: > >> It might be neat to attach ISOs to KVM guests via websockets.  Basically >> the  browser would be the NBD "server" and an NBD client would run on the >> hypervisor, then use `virsh change-media vm1 hdc --insert /dev/nbd0` could >> use

Hello, I am getting errors when doing a make clean under /usr/src, I have always done this before doing a make world, and never a problem. I have tried deleting all of /usr/src and re cvsuped, but the problem persists. FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 14 13:49:58 EST 2003 ===> secure/usr.bin/openssl rm -f buildinf.h openssl/opensslconf.h openssl/evp.h xopenssl app_rand.o apps.o asn1pars.o ca.o

On 29/01/15 21:15, Alex Bligh wrote: > Be frightened: > https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/secure-shell/pnhechapfaindjhompbnflcldabbghjo?hl=en > That's a ssh client implemented in chromium, not a web server acting as sshd. However... ?Secure Shell also knows how to connect to an HTTP-to-ssh relay that was built inside Google. Unfortunately that relay isn't open source,