similar to: CentOS-5 End of Life

On 02/03/17 19:50, James Hogarth wrote: > On 2 Mar 2017 03:49, "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > > On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: >> >> Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have a >> number of installations that need to continue running CentOS 5 so I'd like >> to do a final update before

Am 01.03.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > > Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date > of March 31, 2017. > > This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red > Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. > > Sometime in early April, the current 5.11 tree will be moved onto > vault.centos.org

On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: > > Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have > a number of installations that need to continue running CentOS 5 so > I'd like to do a final update before the tree moves. may I suggest building your own mirror well before then, update it with rsync or lftp weekly (or even daily), from

On 03/01/2017 05:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date > of March 31, 2017. > > This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red > Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. This is for their main RHEL-5 Tree. > > Sometime in early April, the current 5.11 tree will be moved onto > vault.centos.org

On 03/01/2017 09:21 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 01.03.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: >> >> Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date >> of March 31, 2017. >> >> This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red >> Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. >> >> Sometime in

On 02/03/17 00:28, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date > of March 31, 2017. > > This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red > Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. > > Sometime in early April, the current 5.11 tree will be moved onto > vault.centos.org (like CentOS-3 and CentOS-4 have been since

On 01/18/2018 09:56 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: > Apparently I failed to do proper due diligence before making this > recommendation. The Xen 4.4 repo does not have vixen build because of a > dependency upon grub2 which isn't available under CentOS 6. Your best > bet would be to use Vixen for PV domains, so if you think that's > something you want to do, we need some

On 03/02/2017 12:42 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: > On 02/03/17 19:50, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 2 Mar 2017 03:49, "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> >> On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: >>> >>> Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have a >>> number of installations that need to

I would like to take the time to inform people that CentOS-4.4 will contain some major changes. The changes are significant enough that I would like to spell out some of them now, probably at least a month before the release of the upstream "EL4 update 4" is released. The Mozilla Suite (Browser, Mail, Chat clients) will be replaced by SeaMonkey. This is due to Mozilla's change in

The CentOS VIrtualization Special Interest Group wants to remind everyone that the End of Life for the Xen-4.4 branch (currently 4.4.4-19) will be March 31st, 2017. This is because the Xen Project will no longer support Xen-4.4 after that date, based on this link: https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features Xen-4.6 is still available and will be maintained until October 2018

On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6? Red Hat hasn?t released them all yet. Quoting Christopher Robinson in the thread for this here: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0007 "We will be pushing errata out as soon as they have passed our QA team's testing. The more

I have just tried to update to 4.9 a system that was installed from a 4.8 local repo. Because 4.9 has been moved to vault, as described by Johnny in http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/638644-centos4-rhel4-upstream-effective-eol.html, the mirrorlist file basically contains invalid information. http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=4.9&arch=i386&repo=os To avoid the faff of having to edit

On 04/02/2015 12:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:57:23AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >>>> How, without a cross reference of some sort, do you know if a given >>>> CentOS iso will install on hardware where you know that the needed >>>> driver was added in an RH minor rev? >>> always use the latest one. >> Which, combined

On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external > mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks like > 4% still are not completely updated) what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ and http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while

Dear All, We need CentOS 5 for a software, and installed CentOS 5.4. But when we try to install Developments Tools like gcc it gives error that repositories are not found. Can you please help us in install gcc on CentOS 5.4? -bash-3.2$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.4 (Final) -bash-3.2$ uname -a Linux i80pc57 2.6.18-164.el5PAE #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 04:10:44 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

On 04/06/2017 11:32 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > Hi, > > Is the centos-release srpm available anywhere? I do not see any srpms in > vault. > > Regards, > Sorry .. all the SRPMs except centos-release and anaconda are in 6.8/cr/ in vault. Let me do anaconda and centos-release now and then I'll hardlink the others into 6.9/os along with those. Should be out in about an

On 07/05/2018 06:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/04/2018 06:35 PM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 16:06 -0400, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Where can I find the srpm for >>>> centos-release-6-10.el6.centos.12.3.x86_64? >>>>

On 06/01/2015 06:42 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote: > >> I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is >> the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the >> ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? > > There is no licensing issue, but

Hi, I search the following link, and find some kernel source rpm files, such as kernel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.src.rpm. http://vault.centos.org/7.2.1511/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I can't find kernel-3.10.0-327.36.4.el7.src.rpm. Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-06-13 16:27:02, "Fabian Arrotin" <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: >On 13/06/2019 07:47, qw wrote:

Hi All, Currently my system is using httpd 2.2.27. As there were many Vulnerability fixes released under 2.2.29, I would like to upgrade the Apache httpd. My system is having CentOS 6.5. I checked on CentOS Repos using yum but could not find the latest httpd rpm from there. So I am building the httpd rpm from the source tar ball downloaded from apache site. I am able to build the rpm successfully